Two-Stage Fuzzy-Stochastic Robust Programming: A Hybrid Model for Regional Air Quality Management

References

• Flagan, R.C.; Seinfeld, J.H. Fundamentals of Air Pollution Engineering; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Teller, A. The Use of Linear Programming to Estimate the Cost of Some Alternatives Air Pollution Abatement Policies, No. 20. IBM, 1968, 345-353.
   Google Scholar
• Werczberger, E. A Mixed-Integer Programming Model for the Integration of Air Quality Policy into Land-Use Planning, Paper Region; Sci. Assoc. 1974, 33, 141-154.
   Google Scholar
• Singpurwalla, N.D. Models in Air Pollution, Chapter 3. In Gass and Sisson, Eds.; Harper Collins Publishers: New York, NY, 1975; pp 66-102.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J.H.; McBean, E.A.; Farquhar, G.J. Chance-Constrained Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Acid Rain Abatement-I. Complete Co-linearity and Noncolinearity; Atmos. Environ. 1985, 19, 925-937.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J.H.; McBean, E.A.; Farquhar, G.J. Chance-Constrained Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Acid Rain Abatement-II. Limited Co-linearity; Atmos. Environ. 1986, 20, 501-511.
   Google Scholar
• Guldmann, J.-M. Interactions between Weather Stochasticity and the Locations of Pollution Sources and Receptors in Air Quality Planning: a Chance-Constrained Approach; Geo. Anal. 1986, 18, 198-214.
   Google Scholar
• Guldman, J.-M. Chance-Constrained Dynamic Model of Air Quality Management; Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1988, 114, 1116-1126.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J.H.; Bowman, M.L. Critical Loads and Development of Acid Rain Control Options; ASCE J. Environ. Eng. 1994, 120, 273-290.
   Google Scholar
• Macchiato, M.F.; Cosmi, C.; Ragosta, M.; Tosato, G. Atmospheric Emission Reduction and Abatement Costs in Regional Environmental Planning; J. Environ. Manage. 1994, 41, 141-156.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, J.; Tzeng, G. Multicriteria Evaluation for Strategies of Improving and Controlling Air Quality in the Super City: a Case Study of Taipei City; J. Environ. Manage. 1994, 40, 213-229.
   Google Scholar
• Lejano, R.P.; Ayala, P.M.; Gonzales, E.A. Optimizing the Mix of Strategies for Control of Vehicular Emissions; Environ. Manage. 1997, 21, 79-87.
   Google Scholar
• Zolezzi, T. Well-Posedness and Optimization under Perturbations; Ann. Op. Res. 2001, 101, 351-361.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L.; Huang, G.H.; Liu, Y.; Fuller, G.A.A. Fuzzy-Stochastic Robust Programming Model for Regional Air Quality Management under Uncertainty; Eng. Opt. 2003, 35, 177-199.
   Google Scholar
• Haurie, A.; Kübler, J. J.; Clappier, A.; Bergh, H.; van den, A. Metamodeling Approach for Integrated Assessment of Air Quality Policies. Environ. Model. Assess. 2004, 9, 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G.H.; Baetz, B.W.; Patry, G.G.A. Grey Fuzzy Linear Programming Approach for Municipal Solid Waste Management Planning under Uncertainty; Civil Eng. Systems, 1993, 10, 123-146.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G.H.; Baetz, B.W.; Patry, G.G. An Interval Linear Programming Approach for Municipal Solid Waste Management Planning under Uncertainty; Civil Eng. Systems, 1992, 9, 319-335.
   Google Scholar
• Dubios, D.; Prade, H. Possibility Theory—an Approach to the Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press: New York, NY, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Dubios, D.; Prade, H.A. Synthetic View of Belief Revision with Uncertain Inputs in the Framework of Possibility Theory; Int. J. Approx. Reason. 1999, 17, 295-306.
   Google Scholar
• Dubios, D.; Prade, H. On Fuzzy Interpolation; Int. J. Gen. Systems, 1999, 28, 103-112.
   Google Scholar
• Dubios, D.; Prade, H. Qualitative Possibility Theory and Its Applications to Constraint Satisfaction and Decision under Uncertainty; Int. J. Intell. Systems, 1999, 14, 45-53.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, Y. Spatial Analysis and Planning under Imprecision (Studies in Regional Science and Urban Economics). Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D.W., Jr.; Mckinney, D.C. Robust Optimization for Incorporating Risk and Uncertainty in Sustainable Water Resources Planning; In Modeling and Management of Sustainable Basin-Scale Water Resource Systems (Proceedings of a Boulder Symposium), International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication: Wallingford, UK, 1995, 231, 225-232.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, E. Ya. Robust Parametric Optimization of Dynamic Systems Under Bounded Uncertainty; Auto. Remote Control, 1995, 56, 379-386.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, J.M.; Vanderbei, R.J.; Zenios, S.A. Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems; Oper. Res. 1995, 43, 264-281.
   Google Scholar
• Vassiadou-Zeniou, C.; Zenios, S.A. Robust Optimization Models for Managing Callable Bond Portfolios; Eur. J. Op. Res. 1996, 91, 264-273.
   Google Scholar
• Kunjur, A.; Krishnamurty, S.A. Robust Multi-Criteria Optimization Approach; Mech. Mach. Theory, 1997, 32, 797-810.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A.; Nemirovski, A. Robust Convex Optimization. Math. Op. Res. 1998, 23, 10-22.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A.; Nemirovski, A. Robust Solutions to Uncertain Linear Programs; Op. Res. Lett. 1999, 25, 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A.; Nemirovski, A. Robust Optimization-Methodology and Applications; Math. Program., Ser. B, 2002, 92, 453-480.
   Google Scholar
• Dupacova, J. Reflections on Robust Optimization; Lect. Notes Econ. Math. Systems, 1998, 458, 111-127.
   Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui, L.; Seigneuret, F. Robust Optimization Methodologies for the Free Route Concept; In Proceedings of the American Control Conference; 1998; Florida, Dec. 16–18, 1797-1799.
   Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui, L.; Oustry, F.; Lebret, H. Robust Solutions to Uncertain Semidefinite Programs; SIAM J. Optimization, 1998, 9, 33-52.
   Google Scholar
• Inuiguchi, M.; Sakawa, M. Robust Optimization under Softness in a Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem; Int. J. Approx. Reason. 1998, 18, 21-34.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A.; El Ghaoui, L.; Nemirovski, A. Robust Semidefinite Programming. In: Wolkowicz, H., Saigal, R., Vandenberghe, L., Eds.; Handbook on Semidefinite Programming, Kluwer Academic Publishers: The Netherlands, 2000, pp 233–248
   Google Scholar
• Loucks, D.P.; Stedinger, J.R.; Haith, D.A. Water Resource Systems Planning and Analysis; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Birge, J.R.; Louveaux, F.V.A. Multicut Algorithm for Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs; Eur. J. Op. Res. 1988, 34, 384-392.
   Google Scholar
• Birge, J.R.; Louveaux, F.V. Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer: New York, NY, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ruszczynski, A. Parallel Decomposition of Multistage Stochastic Programming Problems; Math. Program. 1993, 58, 201-228.
   Google Scholar
• Mobasheri, F.; Harboe, R.C.A. Two-Stage Optimization Model for Design of a Multipurpose Reservoir; Water Resour. Res. 1970, 6, 22-31.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M.V.F., Pinto, L.M.V.G. Stochastic Optimization of a Multireservior Hydroelectric System: a Decomposition Approach; Water Re-sour. Res. 1985, 6, 779-792.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, L.; Boros, E.; Inotay, F.A. Two-Stage Approach for Large-Scale Sewer Systems Design with Application to the Lake Balaton Resort Area; Eur. J. Op. Res. 1986, 23, 169-178.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D.; Adams, B.J. Optimization of Real-Time Reservoir Operations with Markov Decision Processes; Water Resour. Res. 1986, 22, 345-352.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M.V.F., Pinto, L.M.V.G. Multi-Stage Stochastic Optimization Applied to Energy Planning; Math. Prog. 1991, 52, 359-375.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G.H.; Loucks, D.P. An Inexact Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Water Resources Management under Uncertainty; Civil Eng. Environ. Systems, 2000, 17, 95-118.
   Google Scholar
• Seifi, A.; Hipel, K.W. Interior-Point Method for Reservoir Operation with Stochastic Inflows; J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 2001, 127, 48-57.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsood, I.; Huang, G.H.A. Two-Stage Interval-Stochastic Programming Model for Waste Management under Uncertainty; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 540-552.
   Google Scholar
• Dubios, D.; Prade, H. Operations on Fuzzy Number; Int. J. Sys. Sci. 1978, 9, 613-626.
   Google Scholar
• Negoita, C.V.; Minoiu, S.; Stan, E. On Considering Imprecision in Dynamic Linear Programming; Econ. Comp. Econ. Cybernet. Studies Res. 1976, 3, 83-96.
   Google Scholar
• Soyster, A.L. Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints: Applications to Inexact Linear Programming; Op. Res. 1973, 21, 1154-1157.
   Google Scholar
• Luhandjula, M.K.; Gupta, M.M. On Fuzzy Stochastic Optimization; Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1996, 81, 47-55.
   Google Scholar
• Beale, E. On Minimizing a Convex Function Subject to Linear Inequalities; J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 1955, 17, 173-184.
   Google Scholar
• Dantzig, G.B. Reminiscences about the Origins of Linear Programming. In Bachem, Grostschel, M., Korte, D. Eds.; Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art; Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. SO2 Allowance Market Analysis: 2004 Update; Washington, DC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. Pollutant Dispersion in the Planetary Boundary Layer, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Wark, K.; Warner, C.F.; Davis, W.T. Air Pollution: Its Origin and Control, 3rd ed.; Harper Collins Publishers: New York, NY, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Guidelines for Air Quality. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• de Nevers, N. Air Pollution Control Engineering, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquill, F. Atmospheric Diffusion, 2nd ed.; Halstead Press: New York, NY, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Haith, D.A. Environmental Systems Optimiztion; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A.; Djurfors, S.G. Maximum and Critical Ground Level Concentrations from a Synthetic Crude Oil Plant. In Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, Houston, TX, 1978; paper 78-48.5.
   Google Scholar