Uncertainty Analysis of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Systems Based on Frame 7H versus 7F Gas Turbines

References

• Ratafia-Brown, J.; Manfredo, L.; Hoffmann, J.; Ramezan, M. Major Environmental Aspects of Gasification-Based Power Generation Technologies. Final Report, Prepared by Science Applications International Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy: Washington DC, December 2002; available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/pubs/pdf/final%20env.pdf (accessed 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Holt, N. Operation Experience and Improvement Opportunities for Coal-Based IGCC Plants; Mater. High Temp. 2003, 20, 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Carcasci, C.; Facchini, B. Comparison between Two Gas Turbine Solutions to Increase Combined Power Plant Efficiency; Energy Conversion Manage. 2000, 41, 757-773.
   Google Scholar
• Diwekar, U.M.; Rubin, E.A.; Frey, H.C. Optimal Design of Advanced Power Systems under Uncertainty; Energy Conversion Manage. 1997, 38, 1725-1735.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, N. IGCC Power Plants-EPRI Design & Cost Studies. In 1998 Gasification Technologies Conference; San Francisco, CA, 1998; Gasification Technologies Council: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, E. The F Technology Experience Story; GER-3950C; GE Power Systems: Atlanta, GA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Matta, R.K.; Mercer, G.D.; Tuthill, R.S. Power System for the 21st Century—‘H’ Gas Turbine Combined-Cycles; GER-3935B; GE Power Systems: Schenectady, NY, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Staff report. Baglan Bay Begins Service; Power. 2003, 147, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Falsetti, J.S.; DePuy, R.A.; Brdar, D.; Anand, A.; Paolino, J. From Coal or Oil to 550 MWe via 9H IGCC. In 2000 Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2000; Gasification Technologies Council: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Rubin, E.S. Development and Application of a Probabilistic Evaluation for Advanced Process Technologies; DOE/MC/24248-3015; prepared by Carnegie Mellon University for U.S. Department of Energy: Morgantown, WV, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Rubin, E.S. Integration of Coal Utilization and Environmental Control in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Systems; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1982-1990.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Rubin, E.S.; Diwekar, U.M. Modeling Uncertainties in Advanced Technologies: Application to a Coal Gasification System with Hot-Gas Cleanup; Energy. 1994, 19, 449-463.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Rubin, E.S. Probabilistic Evaluation of Advanced SO2/NOx Control Technology; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1991, 41, 1585-1593.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Rubin, E.S. Uncertainty Evaluation in Capital Cost Projection. In Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design; McKetta, J.J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, 1997, Vol. 59, pp 480-494.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Rubin, E.S. Evaluation of Advanced Coal Gasification Combined-Cycle Systems under Uncertainty; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31, 1299-1307.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C.; Akunuri, N.V. Probabilistic Modeling and Evaluation of the Performance, Emissions, and Cost of Texaco Gasifier-Based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Systems Using ASPEN; Prepared by North Carolina State University for Carnegie Mellon University and U.S. Department of Energy: Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fluor Engineers, Inc. Cost and Performance for Commercial Applications of Texaco Gasifier-Based Gasification-Combined-Cycle Plants, Volume 2: Design Details; EPRI AP-3486; Prepared by Fluor Engineers for Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T.L.; DeLallo, M.R.; Goldstein, H.N.; Grubbs, G.W.; Whites, J.S. Market-Based Advanced Coal Power Systems; Contract No. DE-AC01-94FE62747; prepared by Parsons Infrastructure and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy: Washington, DC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Simbeck, D.R.; Dickenson, R.L.; Oliver, E.D. Coal Gasification Systems: A Guide to Status, Applications and Economics; AP-3109; Prepared by Synthetic Fuel Associates, Inc. for Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• MIT. ASPEN User Manual, Vol. 1 and 2; Prepared by Massachusetts Institute of Technology for U.S. Department of Energy, Morgantown Energy Technology Center: Morgantown, WV, 1982, Revised 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. Evaluation of Gas Turbine and Gasifier-Based Power Generation System. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Diwekar, U.M.; Rubin, E.S. Stochastic Modeling of Chemical Processes; Comput. Chem. Eng. 1991, 15, 105-114.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel Corp.; Global Energy Inc.; Nexant Inc. Gasification Plant Cost and Performance Optimization: Task 1 Topical Report, IGCC Plant Cost Optimization; Contract No. DE-AC26-99FT40342; Prepared by Bechtel Corp., Global Energy Inc., and Nexant Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Morgantown, WV, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Brdar, R.D.; Jones, R.M. GE IGCC Technology and Experience with Advanced Gas Turbines; GER-4207; GE Power Systems: Schenectady, NY, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Eustis, F. H.; Johnson, M.S. Gas Turbine Effects on Integrated-Gasification-Combined-Cycle Power Plant Operations; GS/ER-6770; Prepared by Stanford University for Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, A.C.; Frey, H.C. Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs; Plenum: New York, NY, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M.; Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E.S.; Kalagnanam, J.R.; Frey, H.C.; Berkenpas, M.B. Integrated Environmental Control Modeling of Coal-Fired Power Systems; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 1180-1188.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, C. Uncertainty in Full Fuel Cycle Costs; Energy Conversion Manage. 1996, 37, 825-830.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, A.H.; Tang, W.H. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Volume 2-Decision, Risk and Reliability; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Helton, J.C.; Davis, F.J. Illustration of Sampling-Based Methods for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis; Risk Anal. 2002, 22, 591-622.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H.C; Patil, S.R. Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods; Risk Anal. 2002, 22, 553-578.
   Google Scholar
• SAS OnlineDoc 1999. SAS Version 8.1, SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC; available at http://v8doc.sas.com/sashtml/welcome.htm (accessed 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, W.; Sincich, T. Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Higman, C; Burgt, M. Gasification; Elsevier: Burlington, MA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Title 40—Protection of Environment, Chapter 1, PART 96—NOx Budget Trading Program for State Implementation Plans; available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_03/40cfr96_03.html (accessed 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Evaluating Ozone Control Programs in the Eastern United States: Focus on the NOx Budget Trading Program, 2004; EPA454-K-05-001; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Staudt, J.E. Optimizing Compliance Cost for Coal-Fired Electric Generating Facilities in a Multipollutant Control Environment. In Proceedings ASME Power 2004; ASME Power Conference; Baltimore, MD, March 30 to April 1, 2004.
   Google Scholar