Capitalizing on Curriculum-Based Measurement for Reading: Collaboration Within a Response to Instruction Framework

REFERENCES

• Al Otaiba, S., & Lake, V. E. (2007). Preparing special educators to teach reading and use curriculum-based assessments. Reading Writing, 20, 591–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Council for Administrators of Special Education, Council for Exceptional Children, Council for Learning Disabilities, Division for Learning Disabilities, International Dyslexia Association, … School Social Work Association of American (2006, November). New roles in response to intervention: Creating success for schools and children. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/rtifactsheets.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press & Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canter, A. (2006). Problem solving and RTI: New roles for school psychologists. Communique, 34(5), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Capizzi, A. M., & Barton-Arwood, S. M. (2009). Using a CBM graphic organizer to facilitate collaboration in reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45, 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi, A. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Effects of curriculum-based measurement with and without diagnostic feedback on teacher planning. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 159–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. B., Flynt, E. S., & Cooter, K. S. (2006). Comprehensive reading inventory: Measuring reading development in regular and special education classrooms. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Exceptional Children. (2008). What every special education teacher must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines (6th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L., & Thorsnes, B. J. (2008). Assessing reading multiple measures (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Arena Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditkowsky, B., & Koonce, D. A. (2010). Predicting performance on high-stakes assessment for proficient students and students at risk with oral reading fluency growth. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, B., Haack, K., Koose, S., Osterloh, M., Siemers, E., & Pray, B. (2005). The dilemma of pragmatics: Why schools don't use quality team consultation practices. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16, 127–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, L. J., Hosp, J. L., Hosp, M. K., & Robbins, K. P. (2011). Word recognition error analysis: Comparing isolated word list and oral passage reading. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. A. (2006). RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminiski, R. A. (Eds.). (2007). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (2006). The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Graney, S. B., Martinez, R. S., Missall, K. N., & Aricak, O. T. (2010). Universal screening of reading in late elementary school: R-CBM versus CBM maze. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 368–377. doi:10.1177/0741932509338371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (2011). Response to intervention: Conceptual foundations and evidence-based practices. In M. A. Bray & T. J. Kehle (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of school psychology (pp. 607–618). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Skokut, M., & Lilles, E. (2009). Progress monitoring in oral reading fluency within the context of RTI. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. O., Kroeger, S. D., Musti-Rao, S., Barnett, D. W., & Ward, J. E. (2008). Preservice training in response to intervention: Learning by doing an interdisciplinary field experience. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 745–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J. (2011). Response to intervention models: Curricular implications and interventions. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J., & Patton, J. R. (2008). The role of special educators in a multitiered instructional system. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2004). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight-McKenna, M. (2008). Syllable types: A strategy for reading multisyllabic words. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Goldstein, J., Behuniak, P., Reis, S. M., Black, A. C., Sullivan, E. E., & Rambo, K. (2010). Examining the unexpected: Outlier analysis of factors affecting student achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(3), 426–468.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=nX43fwKc4Ak%3D&tabid=669
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. M., & Machek, G. R. (2007). A survey of training, practice, and competence in reading assessment and intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleologos, T. M., & Brabham, E. G. (2011). The effectiveness of DIBELS oral reading fluency for predicting reading comprehension of high- and low-income students. Reading Psychology, 32, 54–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V. (2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. New York, NY: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, N. R., Altwerger, B., & Jordan, N. (2009). Does DIBELS put reading first? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., Lembke, E. S., & Foegen, A. (2008). Using progress monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure 52(2), 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resistors. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The response-to-intervention instructional model: Some outcomes from a large-scale implementation in Reading First Schools. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 38–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., & Hudson, R. F. (2006). Reading fluency: Critical issues for struggling readers. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 130–158). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Woodruff, A. L., & Murray, C. S. (2011). Differences in the relationship of oral reading fluency and high-stakes measures of reading comprehension. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2011). Is a three-tier reading intervention model associated with reduced placement in special education? Remedial and Special Education, 32, 167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar