Design Research as a Mechanism for Consultants to Facilitate and Evaluate Educational Innovations

REFERENCES

• Batsche, G. M., Elliot, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., … Tilly, W. D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39, 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W. B., & Schulte, A. C. (2011). Psychological consultation and collaboration: Introduction to theory and practice (7th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. (2012). Implementing Response-to-Intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to ensure scientific-based practices (2nd Ed). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Griffiths, A., Parson, L. B., Tilly, W. D., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Response to Intervention: Research for practice. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. M., Batsche, G. M., Curtis, M. J., Stockslager, K., March, A., & Minch, D. (2010). Problem Solving/Response to Intervention evaluation tool technical assistance manual. Retrieved from the Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention website: http://floridarti.usf.edu/resources/program_evaluation/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to Intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (2009). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed.; pp. 591–635). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dorman, C. (2008). Best practices in the display of data. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, V (pp. 2117–2132). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A., & Dexter, D. D. (2011). Response to Intervention: A research based summary. Theory Into Practice, 50(1), 4–11. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.534909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. (2014). Design-based research: Sponsoring innovation in education. Education Canada, 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kurns, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Response to Intervention blueprints for implementation: School-level edition. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Forward (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• McKenny, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J., & Jordan, G. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story. Evaluating and Program Planning, 22, 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practices (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Noell, G. H., & Gansle, K. A. (2006). Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing responses to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pluymert, K. (2014). Problem-solving foundations for school psychological services. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 25–40). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, A. T., Lawton, K., & Elliott, S. N. (2014). Best practices in facilitating and evaluating the integrity of school-based interventions. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 133–146). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Campos, L., & Ricones-Gomez, R. (2013). Collaborative evaluations: A step-by-step model for the evaluator (2nd ed). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, D. (2002). Designing professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Stoiber, K. C. (2014). A comprehensive framework for multitiered systems of support in school psychology. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 41–70). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Higgens-D'Alessandro, A., & Guffey, S. (2012). School climate research summary. Retrieved from http://www.schoolclimate.org/climate/documents/policy/sc-brief-v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, W. D. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem solving and the three-tiered model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 17–36). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar