The Intersection between Systems Change, Implementation Science, and Human Beings: A Call to Investigate People and Context in Future Systems-Level Consultation Research

References

• Baum, B., MacDougal, C., & Smith, D. (2006). Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 60, 854–857. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.028662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R. M., Blase, K. A., & Fixsen, D. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 477–487. doi:10.1177/1049731514537687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littfield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W. B., & Schulte, A. C. (2011). Psychological consultation and collaboration: Introduction to theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Klingbeil, D. A., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Peterson-Brown, S. (2012). Trends in methodological rigor in intervention research published in school psychology journals. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 843–851. doi: 10.1002/pits.21637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. M., & Curtis, M. J. (2014). Best practices in systems-level change. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Systems-level services (pp. 11–28). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. M., Dorman, C. D., Gaunt, B., Hardcastle, B., Justice, K., & March, A. L. (2016). Design research as a mechanism for consultants to facilitate and evaluate educational innovations. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(1), 25–48. doi:10.1080/10474412.2015.1039125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teaching sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19, 476–509. doi:10.1177/0895904805276143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erchul, W. P., & Sheridan, S. M. (2014). Handbook of research in school consultation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., & Friedman, R. M. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication 231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, S. G., Shapiro, E. S., Codding, R. S., Gonzales, J. E., Reddy, L. A., Rosenfield, S. A., … Stoiber, K. C. (2013). Implementation science and school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 77–100. doi:10.1037/spq0000019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (2009). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 591–635). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. (2014). Design-based research: Sponsoring innovation in education. Education Canada, 54(5), 22–24).
   Google Scholar
• Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, R., Pryce, J. M., & Walsh, J. (2014). Philosophical approaches to qualitative research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 81–98). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiner, B. J., & Reismer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What works clearinghouse standards handbook, version 4.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar