Pre-service teachers’ science beliefs, attitudes, and self-efficacy: a multi-case study

References

• Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Association for Science Teachers and Laurence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers’ development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Academy of Science. (2005). Primary connections. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, L., & Meyer, D. (2012). Teaching science as science is practiced: Opportunities and limits for enhancing preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy for science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 395–409.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J., Czerniak, C., & Lumpe, A. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers’ beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 323–343.
   Google Scholar
• Bitner, B. L. (1994). Revised science attitude scale for pre-service elementary teachers: Re examined. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, E. (2007). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 841–860.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education group.
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. (2003). The nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher’s beliefs about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 835–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursal, M. (2008). Changes in Turkish pre-service elementary teachers’ personal science teaching efficacy beliefs and science anxieties during a science method course. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67, 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, T., Campbell, L., & Lunetta, V. (1997). Theoretical based science teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 97, 419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eick, C., & Reed, C. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86, 401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enochs, L., & Riggs, I. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre-service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694–706.
   Google Scholar
• Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Fittell, D. (2008, November 30–December 4). Reforming primary science education: Beyond the ‘stand and deliver’ mode of professional development. AARE 2008 International Education Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Using a card-sorting task to elicit and clarify science-teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 291–309.
   Google Scholar
• Fulp, S. L. (2002). The 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education: National action plan 2008–2012, Volume 1, The National Action Plan. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, A., & Mensah, F. (2011, January). Microteaching: The value of mastery experience in a science methods course. Presented at the ASTE Annual International Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1653–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, J., Czerniak, C., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., Holroyd, C., & Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding in teaching science and technology in primary schools. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hashweh, M. (1996). Effects of science teacher’s epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. (1990). Defining and bridging the gap. In E. Duckworth, J. Easley, D. Hawkins, & A. Henriques (Eds.), Science education: A minds-on approach for the elementary years (pp. 97–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, R. P. (2011). Changes in pre-service elementary teachers’ personal science teaching efficacy and science teaching outcome expectancies: The influence of context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, College Station, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90, 1113–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazempour, M. (2009). Impact of inquiry-based professional development on core conceptions and teaching practices: A case study. Science Educator, 18, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 755–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, P. (2006). Are teachers walking the walk or just talking the talk in science education? Teachers and Teaching, 11, 499–516.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, P. & Watters, J. J. (2006). Transforming pre-service teacher knowledge in science education through multimedia and ICT. Proceedings annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francicso, CA.
   Google Scholar
• King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85, 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J., & Bleicher, R. (2005). Learning the learning cycle: The differential effect on elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, S., & Solomon, J. (2000). Primary teachers’ thinking about the English National Curriculum for Science: Autobiographies, warrants and autonomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1043–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, C. F., & Woods-McConney, A. (2012). “I didn’t always perceive myself as a science person”: Examining efficacy for primary science teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n10.5
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, F. M. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers for urban elementary science classrooms: Challenging cultural biases toward diverse students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 85–109.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, P. D., & Carroll, J. B. (2003). An extended examination of preservice elementary teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 103, 246–251.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., & Norris, D. (1999). Preservice teachers’ views of scientists. Science and Children, 37, 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study. London: Welcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. (2002). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 86, 122–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2008). Practices and innovations in Australian science teacher education programs. Research in Science Education, 38, 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. (2011). Sources of efficacy information in an inservice program for elementary teachers. Science Education, 95, 577–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasley, J., Weiss, I., Shimkus, E., & Smith, P. (2004). Looking inside the classroom: Science teaching in the United States. Science Educator, 12(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Quita, I. (2003, Fall). What is a scientist? Perspectives of teachers of color. Multicultural Education, 11, 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, D., DeTure, L., & Doran, R. (1992). A preliminary assessment of science process skills achievement of pre-service elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in science teaching, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Raider-Roth, M. (2004). Taking the time to think: A portrait of reflection. Teaching and Learning: A Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice, 18, 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, M. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4, 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ramey Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. & Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80, 283–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., Goodrum, D., & Hacking, M. (2001). Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31, 455–498.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), The handbook of research in teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E., Bar, V., & Cohen, A. (2003). The images of scientists and science among Hebrew- and Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 821–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91, 158–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84, 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., & Ranney, M. (2003). Developing the Changes in Attitude about the Relevance of Science (CARS) questionnaire and assessing two high school science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 757–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers’ views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge. Science Education, 83, 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. (2003). Challenge and support: The dynamics of student teachers’ professional learning in the field experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Pedersen, J. (1998, April). Draw-a-science-teacher-test: Preservice elementary teachers perceptions of classroom experiences. A paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Researchers in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, T. (2000). The beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers toward science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 374–379.
   Google Scholar
• Turkmen, H. (2008). Turkish primary students‟ perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4, 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Varma, T., Volkmann, M. J., & Hanuscin, D. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: Influence of elementary science education methods course and science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 301–321.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1996). Using drawings to interrogate professional identity and the popular culture of teaching. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 109–126). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I., Banilower, E., McMahon, K., & Smith, P. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar