‘We matter just the same’: students and pre-service teachers working together in an alternative educational setting

References

• Baumfield, V. M., Hall, E., & Wall, K. (2012). Action research in education: Learning through practitioner enquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. V. (2012). Effective facets of a field experience that contributed to eight preservice teachers’ developing understandings about culturally responsive teaching. Urban Education, 48, 380–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprano, M., Caprano, R. M., & Helfeldt, J. (2010). Do differing types of field experiences make a difference in teacher candidates’ perceived level of competence? Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 131–154.
   Google Scholar
• Caroleo, M. (2014). An examination of the risks and benefits of alternative education. Relational Child & Youth Care Practice, 27, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, A. L. (2012). Collaborative clinical practice: An alternate field experience. Current Issues in Education, 21, 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, S., Besnoy, K., & Steele, E. (2012). Creating dissonance in pre-service teachers’ field experiences. SRATE Journal, 21(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Free, J. L. (2014). The importance of rule fairness: The influence of school bonds on at-risk students in an alternative school. Educational Studies, 40, 144–163.10.1080/03055698.2013.858614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, G., & Rosaen, C. (2009). Strengthening partnerships and boosting conceptual connections in preservice field experience. Teaching Education, 20, 329–342.10.1080/10476210902849958
   Google Scholar
• Glanz, J. (2014). Action research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hallman, H. L. (2012). Community-based field experiences in teacher education: Possibilities for a pedagogical third space. Teaching Education, 23, 241–263.10.1080/10476210.2011.641528
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. (2012). Re-engaging marginalised young people in learning: The contribution of informal learning and community-based collaborations. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 641–653.10.1080/02680939.2012.710018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23, 151–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. (2009). An instructional model for preparing teachers for fieldwork. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21, 252–257.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P. (2014). What are alternative education spaces – and why do they matter? Geography, 99, 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., & Hamer, L. (2012). Preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs toward student diversity and proposed instructional practices: A sequential design study. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 162–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagana-Riordan, C., Aguilar, J. P., Franklin, C., Streeter, C. L., Kim, J. S., Tripodi, S. J., & Hopson, L. M. (2011). At-risk students’ perceptions of traditional schools and a solution-focused public alternative school. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55, 105–114.10.1080/10459880903472843
   Google Scholar
• Lastrapes, W., & Negishi, M. (2012). Foundational field experiences: A window into preservice teachers’ cultural consciousness and self-efficacy for teaching diverse learners. SRATE Journal, 21, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. N., & Butler, M. B. (2010). Becoming aware of the challenges of helping students learn: An examination of the nature of learning during a service-learning experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.10.1111/josi.1946.2.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liakopoulou, M. (2012). The role of field experience in the preparation of reflective teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos, C., Walker, H., Rittershaussen, S., Nuñez, C., Contreras, I., & Solís, M. (2011). Defining content for field-based coursework: Contrasting the perspectives of secondary preservice teachers and their teacher preparation curricula. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 278–288.10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/get-the-facts/public-charter-schools/
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raywid, M. A. (1994). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52, 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riele, K. T. (2007). Educational alternatives for marginalised youth. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34, 53–68.10.1007/BF03216865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassi, K., Lajimodiere, D., Bertolini, K., & Ketterling, G. (2012). Reading the white space in a multicultural field experience. Multicultural Education, 19, 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Scherff, L., & Singer, N. R. (2012). The preservice teachers are watching: Framing and reframing the field experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 263–272.10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Selland, M. K., & Bien, A. C. (2014). Collaborative teacher education: Forging tangible connections between field and classroom. Teaching Education, 25, 239–260.10.1080/10476210.2014.889670
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• The Urban Institute. (2003). Vulnerable youth: Identifying their need for alternative educational settings. Washington, DC: Zweig, J. M.
   Google Scholar
• Turunen, T. A., & Tuovila, S. (2012). Mind the gap. Combining theory and practice in a field experience. Teaching Education, 23, 115–130.10.1080/10476210.2012.669751
   Google Scholar
• Washburn-Moses, L., Kopp, T., & Hettersimer, J. E. (2012). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of the value of an early field experience in a laboratory setting. Issues in Teacher Education, 21, 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., Stemp, K., & McGinty, S. (2011). Re-engaging young people with education and training: What are the alternatives? Youth Studies Australia, 30, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.10.1177/0022487109347671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar