‘It’s not that easy to solve’: edTPA and preservice teacher learning

References

• An, S. (2016). Teaching elementary school social studies methods under edTPA. The Social Studies, 107, 19–27.10.1080/00377996.2015.1094724
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E., & Gordon, E. (2014). From assessment Of education to the assessment FOR education: Policy and futures. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler-Olcott, K., & Fleming, S. (2014, December). Multiple perspectives on the state-mandated implementation of a high-stakes performance assessment for pre-service english teacher candidates. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the Literacy Research Association. Marco Island, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler-Olcott, K., Fleming, S. M., & Nieroda, J. L. (2016). ‘Perhaps these are not poetic times at all’: Using poetry to cope with and critique a high-stakes teacher performance assessment. English Education, 48, 237–266.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler-Olcott, K., & Fleming, S. M. (2017). Multiple perspectives on the state-mandated implementation of a high-stakes performance assessment for preservice English teacher candidates. Action in Teacher Education, 39, 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, R. (2008). Beyond assessment: Performance assessments in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action. Professional development that matters (pp. 45–58). New York, NY: Teachers College Press
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77, 6–27.10.1080/00131725.2013.739015
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Stern, R., Sánchez, J. G., Miller, A., Keefe, E. S., Fernández, M. B., … Baker, M. (2016). Holding teacher preparation accountable: A review of claims and evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved September 23, 2016, from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/teacher-prep
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 35–47.10.1177/0022487109348024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, D. (2013). Responding to edTPA: Transforming practice or applying shortcuts? AILACTE Journal, 19, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• edTPA. About edTPA.
   Google Scholar
• edTPA. Participation map.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). More grounded theory: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336–342.10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning, (pp (pp. 139–163). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Lloyd, G., Arbaugh, F., Gamson, D., McDonald, S., Nolan, J., & Whitney, A. (2014). Performance assessment of teaching; Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 372–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachuk, A., & Koellner, K. (2015). Performance based assessment for certification: Insights from edTPA implementation. Language Arts, 93, 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwell, K., & Oyler, C. (2016). Unstandardized responses to a ‘standardized’ test: The edTPA as gatekeeper and curricular change agent. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 120–134.10.1177/0022487115624739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustick, D., Magouirk-Colbert, M., & Paugh, P. (2010, October). TPAC teacher performance assessment consortium. Presentation at the Fall 2010 meeting of the Massachusetts Council of Colleges of Teacher Education. Sturbridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, S. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Retrieved September 23, 2016, from http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/accountability/educators/fastattributes04081.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissan, K., Choppin, J., Cloonan, K., & Shang-Butler, H. (2016, April). Celebrations, confessionals, and creative interpretations: Representing teaching practice in the edTPA as a high-stakes certification exam in New York and Washington states. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen, K. W., & Choppin, J. M. (2015). Preservice teachers’ adaptations to tensions associated with the edTPA during its early implementation in New York and Washington states. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(103), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. (2012, July 19). The teaching performance assessment consortium (TPAC). Presentation by Stanford Center for Assessment Learning and Equity. Medford, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C. A., Singer-Gabella, M., Sloan, T., & Lin, S. (2014). Driving blind: Why we need standardized performance assessment in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8, 8–30.
   Google Scholar
• Place, N. (2014). The edTPA in Washington State: Dilemmas and opportunities, presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Philadelphia PA, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, E. M., Schram, T., McCurdy, K., Chang, T. H., & Evans, C. M. (2016). Politics of policy: Assessing the implementation, impact, and evolution of the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) and edTPA. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA? Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 421–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarantino, A. (2003). Affordances explained. Philosophy of Science, 70, 949–961.10.1086/377380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity (SCALE). edTPA.
   Google Scholar
• Stansbury, K. (2006). Handbook for implementing scorer training: Appendix G. Retrieved September 23, 2016, from https://www.pacttpa.org/_main/hub.php?pageName=Publications_and_Presentations
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C. & Pecheone, R. (2010). Teaching performance assessments as summative events educative tools. In Mary Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and teacher quality: A handbook (pp. 69–132). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, A. (2012a, January). Teacher performance assessment consortium overview. Webinar presented by Stanford Center for Assessment Learning and Equity. Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, A. (2012b). Field test update: Presenting to deans and directors of teacher education. Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (2012). Keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 70, 10–16.
   Google Scholar