The regulatory effects of high-stakes accountability in preservice teacher evaluation

References

• Au, W. (2013). What’s a nice test like you doing in a place like this? The edTPA and corporate education “reform”. Rethinking Schools, 27(4), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S.J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W.J. (2002, April 1-5). Development and validation of student teaching performance assessment based on Danielson’s framework for teaching. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bottery, M. (2000). The directed profession: Teachers and the state in the third millennium. Journal of In-service Education, 26(3), 475–486.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J.H., & Lochte, H.A. (2017). Introduction. In J.H. Carter & H.A. Lochte (Eds.), Teacher performance assessment
and accountability reforms (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56000-1
   Google Scholar
• Castle, S., & Shaklee, B.D. (Eds.). (2006). Assessing teacher performance: Performance- based assessment in teacher education. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, C. (2017). Raising the stakes: Objectifying teaching in the edTPA and Danielson rubrics. In J.H. Carter & H.A. Lochte (Eds.), Teacher performance assessment
and accountability reforms (pp. 790–1005). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56000-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, C.D. (2018). Voices from student teachers in New York: The persistence of a subtractive experience of the edTPA as a licensure exam for initial certification. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 27.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Carney, M.C., Keefe, E.S., Burton, S., Chang, W.C., Fernández, M.B., … Baker, M. (2018). Reclaiming accountability in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coggshall, J., Max, J., & Bassett, K. (2008, June). Key issue: Using performance-based assessment to identify and support high-quality teachers. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/keyIssue-June2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conley, M., & Garner, G. (2015). The edTPA and the (de)skilling of America’s teachers? Teacher’s College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=18037
   Google Scholar
• Cronenberg, S., Johnson, D., Jones, A., Korson, S., Murray, N., Parrish, M., & Johnston-Parsons, M. (2016). Trouble with the edTPA: Sliding from teaching to preparing for the test. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 8(1), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M.E. (2013). The role of performance assessment in developing teaching as a profession. Rethinking Schools, 27(4), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Newton, S.P., & Wei, R.C. (2013). Developing and assessing beginning teacher effectiveness: The potential of performance assessments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(3), 179–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A.E., & Klein, S.P. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., & Segers, M. (2006). Learning and the emerging new assessment culture. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends (pp. 191e206). Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dover, A.G., & Schultz, B.D. (2016, January). Troubling the edTPA: Illusions of objectivity and rigor. In The Educational Forum, 80(1), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, A.G., Schultz, B.D., Smith, K., & Duggan, T.J. (2015). Who’s preparing our candidates? edTPA, localized knowledge, and the outsourcing of teacher evaluation. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17914
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J.E., Jr., Tenam-Zemach, M., & Burns, L.D. (2015). Introduction: Why a book on rubrics? Problematizing the unquestioned. In M. Tenam-Zemach & J.E. Flynn Jr. (Eds.), Rubric nation: Critical inquiries on the impacts of rubrics in education (pp. xi–xxx). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Gurl, T. J., Caraballo, L.,Grey, L., Gunn, J. H., Gerwin, D., & Bembenutty, H. (2016). Policy, professionalization, privatization, and performance assessment. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D.O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Policy and Practice Brief. MET Project. Seattle: Bill &Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., Taylor, E.S., Tyler, J.H., & Wooten, A.L. (2010). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data (NBER Working Paper 15803). National Bureau of Economic Research website. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15803.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2007). Introduction to interview research. Sage Online Research Methods, 2–10. doi:10.4135/9781849208963
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. (2015). Learning through action: Teacher candidates and performance assessments (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Long, C., & Stansbury, K. (1994). Performance assessments for beginning teachers: Options and lessons. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(4), 318–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madeloni, B. (2015). edTPA: Doubling down on whiteness in teacher education. In B. Picower & E. Mayorga (Eds.), What’s race got to do with it? How current school reform policy maintains racial and economic inequality (pp. 167–182). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Madeloni, B., & Gorlewski, J. (2013). Wrong answer to the wrong question: Why we need critical teacher education, not standardization. Rethinking Schools, 27(4). Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/27_04/27_04_madeloni-gorlewski.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A.H. (1948). Cognition of the particular and of the generic. Psychological Review, 55(1), 22–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen, K.W., & Choppin, J.M. (2015). Preservice teachers’ adaptations to tensions associated with the edTPA during its early implementation in New York and Washington states. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(103), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Milanowski, A.T. (2004). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Milanowski, A.T. (2011). Validity research on teacher evaluation systems based on the framework for teaching. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Abstract Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED520519
   Google Scholar
• Parkison, P.T. (2016, January). The teacher as commodity: What we lose in a captive market. The Educational Forum, 80(1), 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, N.G., & Perhamus, L.M. (2015). The rubricization of teacher hood and student hood: Intertextuality, identity, and the standardization of self. In M. Tenam-Zemach & J.E. Flynn Jr. (Eds.), Rubric nation: Critical inquiries on the impacts of rubrics in education (pp. 21–33). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paugh, P., Wendell, K.B., Power, C., & Gilbert, M. (2018). ‘It’s not that easy to solve’: edTPA and preservice teacher learning. Teaching Education, 29(2), 147–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, C.A., Gallucci, C., & Sloan, T. (2010). Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 451–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roegman, R., Goodwin, A.L., Reed, R., & Scott-McLaughlin, R.M., II. (2016). Unpacking the data: An analysis of the use of Danielson’s (2007) framework for professional practice in a teaching residency program. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 111–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S.R., & Brown, E.R. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in Chicago: Lessons learned from classroom observations, principal-teacher conferences, and district implementation. Research Report. 1313 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S. R., & Brown, E. (2010). Rethinking teacher evaluation: Findings from thefirst year of the excellence in teaching project in Chicago Public Schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA? Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 421–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, B.D., & Dover, A.G. (2017). “We do everything with the edTPA” Interrupting and disrupting teacher education in troubling times. In Eds. (J.H. Carter & H.A. Lochte), Teacher performance assessment
and accountability reforms (pp. 107–118). doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56000-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Singer-Gabella, M. (2012). New way of testing rookie teachers could be a game changer. Hechinger Report. Retrieved from http://hechingerreport.org/testing-what-it-takes-to-teach/
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J., Lippincott, A., & Bower, D. (1998). The inherent tensions in the multiple uses of portfolios in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M.P., & Sartain, L. (2015). Does better observation make better teachers? Education Next, 15(1), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Gorlewski, J. (2018). Who decides who becomes a teacher?: Schools of education as sites of resistance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R.C., & Pecheone, R.L. (2010). Assessment for learning in preservice teacher education. In M.M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. 69–132). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A.E., Ehrenberg, P., & Leibbrand, J. (Eds.). (2008). It’s all about student learning: Assessing teacher candidates’ ability to impact P-12 students. Washington, DC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar