Team teaching in large spaces: three case studies framed by relational agency

References

• Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. R. (2016). Words their way (6th ed.). Melbourne: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, P., Brekelmans, M., Nieuwenhuis, L., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Fostering teacher community development: A review of design principles and a case study of an innovative interdisciplinary team. Learning Environments Research, 15(3), 319–344.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Hartwell, A., & Thomas, C. (2018). Interdisciplinary design teams of pre-service and in-service teachers: Issues with collaboration. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 19(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Deed, C., Blake, D., Henriksen, J., Mooney, A., Prain, V., Tytler, R., … Fingland, D. (2019). Teacher adaptation to flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10984-019-09302-0
   Google Scholar
• Deed, C., Cox, P., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., Keeffe, M., … Yager, Z. (2014). Personalized learning in the open classroom: The mutuality of teacher and student agency. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9, 66–75.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2007). Relational agency in professional practice: A CHAT analysis. An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2014). Epilogue. In V. Prain, P. Cox, C. Deed, D. Edwards, C. Farrelly, M. Keefe, … L. Mow (Eds.), Adapting to teaching and learning in open-plan schools (pp. 205–210). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2015). Recognising and realising teachers’ professional agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 779–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egodawatte, G., McDougall, D., & Stoilescu, D. (2011). The effects of teacher collaboration in grade 9 applied mathematics. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(3), 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2005). Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fluid organizational fields. In M. M. Beyerlein, S. T. Beyerlein, & F. A. Kennedy (Eds.), Collaborative capital: Creating intangible value (pp. 307–336). Bingley: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, M., & Watson, D. (2016). Learning through child observation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, S. (2009). What did you do in school today? Teaching effectiveness: A framework and rubric. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K., & Britton, T. (2011). STEM teachers in professional learning communities: From good teachers to great teaching. Washington: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/1098-executive-summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, N. (2018). The whole school. Planning and evaluating innovative middle and secondary schools. In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation. Conceptualising and evaluating innovative learning environments (pp. 187–202). Boston: Brill/Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Glazier, J., Boyd, A., Hughes., K., Able, H., & Mallous, R. (2017). The elusive search for teacher collaboration. The New Educator, 13(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2013). Exploding the myths of school reform. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2013). Team learning: Collective reflection processes in teacher teams. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(5), 296–309.
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, J. P., Segurado, I., & Oliveira, H. (2003). A collaborative project using narratives: What happens when pupils work on mathematical investigations? In A. Peter-Koop, V. Santos-Wagner, C. Breen, & A. Begg (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 85–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., Blake, D., Deed, C., Edwards, M., Emery, S., Farrelly, C., … Zitzlaff, T. (2018). A framework to support personalising prescribed school curricula. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1101–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C, … Yager, Z. (2014). Adapting to teaching and learning in open-plan schools. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., … Yager, Z. (2013). Personalised learning: Lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 654–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., Keeffe, M., … Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2015). Personalising learning in open-plan schools. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., Waldrip, B., Sbaglia, R., & Lovejoy, V. (2017). Towards personalising learning in school science: Making this learning more relevant. Teaching Science, 63(1), 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Robutti, O., Cusi, A., Clark‐Wilson, A., Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Esteley, C., … Joubert., M. (2016). ICME international survey on teachers working and learning through collaboration. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 651–690.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 67–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. P., Emery, S., Prain, V., Papageorgiou, J., & McKendrick, A.-M. (2019). Influences on local curriculum innovation in times of change: A literacy case study. Australian Education Researcher, 46(3), 469–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topfer, C., & Arendt, D. (2010). Guiding thinking for effective spelling. South Melbourne: Nelson Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15(1), 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement. (First National Report). Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
   Google Scholar