1,706
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The role of structure and interaction in teachers’ decision making during allocation meetings

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 332-354 | Received 16 Oct 2020, Accepted 23 Mar 2021, Published online: 18 May 2021

References

  • Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455.
  • Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & Oost, H. (2008). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality and Quantity, 42(2), 257–274.
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Evaluation assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114–129.
  • Bang, D., & Frith, C. D. (2017). Making better decisions in groups. Royal Society Open Science, 4(8), 170–193.
  • Barton, M. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2014). Assessing member expertise in groups. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(3), 228–257.
  • Benner, A. D. (2011). The transition to high school: Current knowledge, future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 23(3), 299–328.
  • Bol, T., Witschge, J., Van De Werfhorst, H. G., & Dronkers, J. (2014). Curricular tracking and central examinations: Counterbalancing the impact of social background on student achievement in 36 countries. Social Forces, 92(4), 1545–1572.
  • Boone, S., & Van Houtte, M. (2012). Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(1), 1–19.
  • Bouwmans, M., Runhaar, P., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Fostering teachers’ team learning: An interplay between transformational leadership and participative decision making? Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 71–80.
  • Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–56.
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621.
  • Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2018). Opening or closing doors for students? Equity and data use in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 131–152.
  • De Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & Van Der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 168–179.
  • De Kleijn, R., & Van Leeuwen, A. (2018). Reflections and review on the audit procedure: Guidelines for more transparency. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–8.
  • Dobie, T. E., & Anderson, E. R. (2015). Interaction in teacher communities: Three forms teachers use to express contrasting ideas in video clubs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 230–240.
  • Elffers, L. (2012). One foot out the school door? Interpreting the risk for dropout upon the transition to post-secondary vocational education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(1), 41–61.
  • Harell, K. F. (2019). Deliberative decision making in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 299–308.
  • Hauer, K. E., Ten Cate, O., Holmboe, E., Boscardin, C., Iobst, W., Chesluk, B., … O’Sullivan, P. S. (2016). Ensuring resident competence: A narrative review of the literature on group decision making to inform the work of clinical competency committees. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(2), 156–164.
  • Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2004). Leadership and managing conflict in meetings. Pragmatics, 14(4), 439–462.
  • Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217.
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697.
  • Keeney, R. L. (2013). Foundations for group decision analysis. Decision Analysis, 10(2), 103–120.
  • Keeney, R. L. (2015). Understanding and using the group decision analysis model. In B. Kamiński, G. Kersten, & T. Szapiro (Eds.), Outlooks and insights on group decision and negotiation (pp. 77–86). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_6.
  • Keller, J. M., & Joung, S. (2004, October 19–23). The effects of high-structure cooperative versus low-structure collaborative design of decision change, critical thinking, and interaction pattern during online debates [Paper presentation]. Association for Educational Communications and Technology Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158.
  • LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 43–89.
  • Main, K. (2012). Effective middle school teacher teams: A ternary model of interdependency rather than a catch phrase. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 75–88.
  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Dechurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535.
  • Nelson, T. H., Deuel, A., Slavit, D., & Kennedy, A. (2010). Leading deep conversations in collaborative inquiry groups. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(5), 175–179.
  • Olsen, B., & Buchanan, R. (2019). An investigation of teachers encouraged to reform grading practices in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 2004–2039.
  • Petukhova, V., & Bunt, H. (2007). A multidimensional approach to multimodal dialogue act annotation. In J. Geertzen, E. Thijsse, H. Bunt, & A. Schiffrin (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on computational semantics IWCS-7 (pp. 142–153). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
  • Popp, J. S., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347–359.
  • Schildkamp, K., & Ehren, M. (2013). From “intuition”- to “data”-based decision making in dutch secondary schools? In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai., & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 49–67). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_4
  • Schindler, S. (2017). School tracking, educational mobility and inequality in German secondary education: Developments across cohorts. European Societies, 19(1), 28–48.
  • Schwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, (2007(114), 11–25.
  • Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67–100.
  • Sleenhof, J. P., Koopman, M., Thurlings, M. C., & Beijaard, D. (2019). An exploratory study into teachers’ beliefs and experiences about allocating students. Teaching and Teacher Education,80, 94–105.
  • Timmermans, A. C., De Boer, H., Amsing, H. T. A., & Van Der Werf, M. P. C. (2018). Track recommendation bias: Gender, migration background and SES bias over a 20-year period in the Dutch context. British Educational Research Journal, 44(5), 847–874.
  • Uhlenbeck, A. M., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2002). Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 242–272.
  • Van Gasse, R., Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2016). Teacher collaboration on the use of pupil learning outcome data: A rich environment for professional learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 387–397.
  • Van Gasse, R., Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2017). Individual, co-operative and collaborative data use: A conceptual and empirical exploration. British Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 608–626.
  • Vanlommel, K., & Schildkamp, K. (2019). How do teachers make sense of data in the context of high-stakes decision making? American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 792–821.
  • Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2017). Teachers’ decision making: Data based or intuition driven? International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 75–83.
  • Zarnoth, P., & Sniezek, J. A. (1997). The social influence of confidence in group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 345–366.