402
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Disrupting their frame of reference: teacher candidates in alternative education settings

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 387-403 | Received 08 Mar 2021, Accepted 24 Jun 2021, Published online: 13 Jul 2021

References

  • Afacan, K., & Wilkerson, K. L. (2019). The effectiveness of behavior-focused alternative middle schools for students with disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 45(1), 41–52.
  • Ashcroft, R. (1999). Training and professional identity for educators in alternative education settings. The Clearing House, 73(2), 82–85.
  • Booker, K., & Mitchell, A. (2011). Patterns in recidivism and discretionary placement in disciplinary alternative education: The impact of gender, ethnicity, age, and special education status. Education and Treatment of Children,34(2), 193–208.
  • Carver, P. R., & Lewis, L. (2011). Dropout prevention services and programs in public school districts: 2010-11 (NCES 2011-037). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Carver, P. R., Lewis, L., & Tice, P. (2010). Alternative schools and programs for public school students at risk of educational failure: 2007–08 (NCES 2010–026). US department of education. In National center for education statistics (pp. 77). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory ((2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Charmaz, K. (2016). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 34–45.
  • Free, J. L. (2017). “Is it our job to teach them to read or to act appropriately?”: Teachers’ and staff’s perceptions of an alternative school. Sociological Inquiry, 87(3), 501–523.
  • Freed, A., Benavides, A., & Huffling, L. (2019). Teaching, reflecting and learning: Exploring teacher education study abroad programs as transformational learning opportunities. In K. Tirri & A. Toom (Eds.) Pedagogy in Basic and Higher Education: Current Developments and Challenges (pp 137-–162). Books on Demand.
  • Glassett, S. (2012, April). Caring is not enough: Acritical systematic review of recent research on alternative education [Conference proceedings]. Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Vancouver. New York, NY.
  • Jordan, A. W., Jordan, K. H., & Hawley, T. S. (2017). Purpose and passion: The Rationales of public alternative educators. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41(4), 263–273.
  • Kennedy-Lewis, B. L., Whitaker, D., & Soutullo, O. (2016). “Maybe that helps folks feel better about what they’re doing”: Examining contradictions between educator presumptions, student experiences, and outcomes at an alternative school. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 21(4), 230–245.
  • Lovett, C. (2009). Academic engagement in alternative education settings. (Unpublished masters thesis.)
  • Mason-Williams, L., & Gagnon, J. C. (2017). An analysis of teacher sorting in secondary special education and alternative schools. The Journal of Special Education, 50(4), 239–250.
  • McNulty, C. P., & Roseboro, D. L. (2009). “I’m not really that bad”: Alternative school students, stigma, and identity politics. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 412–427.
  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (1997(74), 5–12.
  • Mezzacappa, D. (2019, March 27). Feds tell Pennsylvania to overhaul alternative education programs. The Notebook. https://philadelphia.chalkbeat.org/2019/3/27/22186382/feds-tell-pa-to-overhaul-alternative-education-programs.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics (2020). Characteristics of U.S. Public School Teachers. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clr.asp#:~:text=In%202017%E2%80%9318%2C%20about%2079,1%20percent%20of%20public%20school
  • Perzigian, A. B., Afacan, K., Justin, W., & Wilkerson, K. L. (2017). Characteristics of students in traditional versus alternative high schools: A Cross-Sectional analysis of enrollment in one urban district. Education and Urban Society, 49(7), 676–700.
  • Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2021). Alternative education for disruptive youth. https://www.education.pa.gov/K-12/Alternative%20Education%20for%20Disruptive%20Youth/Pages/default.aspx
  • Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Special Education. (2020). Special Education Data Report School year 2019-2020. https://penndata.hbg.psu.edu/penndata/documents/BSEReports/SD_Reports/2019-2020/PDF_Documents/Speced_Data_Report_State_2019-2020_Final.pdf
  • Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., Hurd, K., & Romano, C. A. (2018). Do color blindness and multiculturalism remedy or foster discrimination and racism? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 200–206.
  • Porowski, A., O’Conner, R., & Lou, J. L. (2014). How do states define alternative education? (REL 2014–038). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
  • Raywid, M. A. (1994). Synthesis of research: Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 26–31. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept94/vol52/num01/Synthesis-of-Research-~-Alternative-Schools@-The-State-of-the-Art.aspx
  • Stewart, S., & Richardson, B. (2000). Reflection and its place in the curriculum on an undergraduate course: Should it be assessed? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 369–380.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln Eds., Handbook of qualitative research, Vol. 17(1), 273–285. SAGE.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wilkerson, K., Afacan, K., Perzigian, A., Justin, W., & Lequia, J. (2016). Behavior-focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 81–94.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.