References
- Bieneck, S., & Krahé, B. (2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1785–1797. doi:10.1177/0886260510372945
- Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239–1259.
- Catellani, P., Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2004). Counterfactual thinking and stereotypes: The nonconformity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 421–436.
- Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice, 39, 565–650.
- Dreher, R. (2014, February 19). Patrick Henry College responds. The American Conservative. Retrieved from http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/patrick-henry-college-responds/
- Feldman, K. (2014, February). Sexual assault at God's Harvard. New Republic. Retrieved from http://www.newrepublic.com//article/116623/sexual-assault-patrick-henry-college-gods-harvard
- Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459–464.
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.
- Hartshorne, J. K. (2013). What is implicit causality? Language and Cognitive Processes. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.796396
- Hartshorne, J. K., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: The advantages of finer-grained semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1474–1508. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.689305
- Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.
- Krahé, B. (1991). Social psychological issues in the study of rape. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 279–309.
- Krahé, B., Temkin, J., & Bieneck, S. (2007). Schema-driven information processing in judgments about rape. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 601–619.
- McCaul, K. D., Veltum, L. G., Boyechko, V., & Crawford, J. J. (1990). Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, and foreseeability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–26.
- McGuire, M. D., Donner, S., & Callahan, E. (2012). Misogyny: It's still the law—An empirical assessment of the Missouri juvenile court system's processing of rape and robbery offenders. Gender Issues, 29(1–4), 1–24.
- National Institute of Justice. (2010). Rape and Sexual Violence. Retrieved from: http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/rape-sexual-violence/Pages/welcome.aspx
- Pickering, M. J., & Majid, A. (2007). What are implicit causality and consequentiality? Language & Cognitive Processes, 22, 780–788.