Publication Cover
Psychological Inquiry
An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory
Volume 25, 2014 - Issue 2
409
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COMMENTARIES

How Complete Is the Path Model of Blame?

References

  • Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 368–378.
  • Ames, D. R., & Johar, G. V. (2009). I’ll know what you’re like when I see how you feel: How and when affective displays influence behavior-based impressions. Psychological Science, 20, 586–593.
  • Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish?: Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.
  • Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380.
  • Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B. (2000). Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 291–300.
  • Goodwin, G. P., & Benforado, A. (in press). Judging the goring ox: Retribution directed towards animals. Cognitive Science.
  • Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168.
  • Gromet, D. M., Goodwin, G. P., & Goodman, R. A. (2014). Pleasure at another's pain: The influence of a target's hedonic states on attributions of evil. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Cushman, F. (2012). Benefiting from misfortune: When harmless actions are judged to be morally blameworthy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 52–62.
  • Kant, I. (1991). The metaphysics of morals (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). In H. Reiss (Ed.), Kant: Political writings (pp. 131–175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1797)
  • Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2012). Moral, cognitive, and social: The nature of blame. In J. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & K. Sedikides (Eds.), Social thinking and interpersonal behaviour (14th Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology; pp. 313–341). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Mazzocco, P. J., Alicke, M. D., & Davis, T. L. (2004). On the robustness of outcome bias: No constraint by prior culpability. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 131–146.
  • Nadler, J., & McDonnell, M.-H. (2012). Moral character, motive, and the psychology of blame. Cornell Law Review, 97, 255–304.
  • Robinson, P. H., Goodwin, G. P., & Reisig, M. D. (2010). The disutility of injustice. New York University Law Review, 85, 1940.
  • Robinson, P. H., & Kurzban, R. (2007). Concordance and conflict in intuitions of justice. Minnesota Law Review, 91, 1829–1907.
  • Schwartz, G. S., Kane, T. R., Joseph, J. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1978). The effects of post-transgression remorse on perceived aggression, attributions of intent, and level of punishment. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 293–297.
  • Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.
  • Sundby, S. E. (1998). Capital jury and absolution: The intersection of trial strategy remorse and the death penalty. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1557–1598.
  • Szczurek, L., Monin, B., & Gross, J. J. (2012). The stranger effect: The rejection of affective deviants. Psychological Science, 23, 1105–1111.
  • Taylor, C., & Kleinke, C. L. (1992). Effects of severity of accident, history of drunk driving, intent, and remorse on judgments of a drunk driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1641–1655.
  • Voiklis, J., Cusimano, C., & Malle, B. F. (2014, July). A social-conceptual map of moral criticism. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, Canada.    
  • Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.