Publication Cover
Psychological Inquiry
An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory
Volume 26, 2015 - Issue 3
288
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COMMENTARIES

Moving Psychopathology Forward

&

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validiatioin by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
  • Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1973). Problems in the measurement of cognitive deficit. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 380–385.
  • Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1978). The measurement of differential deficit. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 14, 303–311.
  • Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Commentary on two articles concerning generalized and specific cognitive deficits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 31–39.
  • Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Golden, R. R., & Meehl, P. E. (1979). Detection of the schizoid taxon with MMPI indicators. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 217–233.
  • Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636–645.
  • Gottesman, I. I., & Shields J. (1972). Schizophrenia and genetics: A twin study vantage point. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Hyman, S. E. (1998). NIMH during the tenure of Director Steven E. Hyman, MD: The now and future of NIMH. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(Suppl.), 36–40.
  • Insel, T. R., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2009). Endophenotypes: Bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 988–989.
  • Kendler, K. S. (2005). “A gene for…”: The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1243–52.
  • Kozak, M. J., & Miller, G. A. (1982). Hypothetical constructs versus intervening variables: A re-appraisal of the three-systems model of anxiety assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 347–358.
  • Lenzenweger M. F. 2010. Schizotypy and schizophrenia: The view from experimental psychopathology. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Leshner, A. I. (1997). Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science, 278, 45–47.
  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Cognitive neuroscience and depression: Legitimate versus illegitimate reductionism and five challenges. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 263–272.
  • Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Tellegen, A., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1992). Emergenesis: Genetic traits that may not run in families. American Psychologist, 47, 1565–1577.
  • Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., & Iacono, W. G. (1982). EEG spectra in twins: Evidence for a neglected mechanism of genetic determination. Physiological Psychology, 10, 60–65.
  • Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
  • Miller, G. A. (1996). How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology. Psychophysiology, 33, 615–628.
  • Miller, G. A. (2004). Another quasi-thirty years of slow progress. Applied and Preventive Psychology: Current Scientific Perspectives, 11, 61–64.
  • Miller, G. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.
  • Miller, G. A., Clayson, P. E., & Yee, C. M. (2014). Hunting genes, hunting endophenotypes. Psychophysiology, 51, 1329–1330.
  • Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000). Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212–215.
  • Miller, G. A., & Kozak, M. J. (1993). A philosophy for the study of emotion: Three-systems theory. In N. Birbaumer, & A. Öhman (Eds.), The structure of emotion: Physiological, cognitive and clinical aspects (pp. 31–47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
  • Miller, G. A., & Rockstroh, B. (2013). Endophenotypes in psychopathology research: Where do we stand? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 177–213.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.