References
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
- Blashfield, R. K., Reynolds, S. M., & Stennett, B. (2012). The death of histrionic personality disorder. In T. A. Widiger & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders. (pp. 603–627). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bluhm, R. (2015). Karl Popper. In R. L. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 2160–2165). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.
- Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl R. Popper (pp. 412–463). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
- Casey, B. J., Craddock, N., Cuthbert, B. N., Hyman, S. E., Lee, F. S., & Ressler, K. J. (2013). DSM-5 and RDoC: Progress in psychiatry research? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14, 810–814. doi: 10.1038/nrn3621
- Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 14, 671–684.
- Cuthbert, B., & Insel, T. (2010). The data of diagnosis: New approaches to psychiatric classification. Psychiatry, 73, 311–314.
- Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013). Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928–937. doi:10.1037/a0034028
- Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
- Gunderson, J. G. (2013). Seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM-5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 368–376. doi:10.1037/per0000026
- Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739)
- Kelley, L. P., & Blashfield, R. K. (2009). An example of psychological science's failure to self-correct. Review of General Psychology, 13, 122–129. doi:10.1037/a0015287
- Kendler, K. S., & Zachar, P. (2008). The incredible insecurity of psychiatric nosology. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry: Explanation, phenomenology, and nosology. (pp. 368–385). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Krueger, R. F. (2013). Personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era. Personality disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 355–362. doi:10.1037/per0000028
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science, 48 (1), 19–49.
- Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.
- Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
- Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2013). Missed opportunities in the DSM-5 Section III personality disorder model: Commentary on “Personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era”. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 365–366. doi:10.1037/per0000043
- Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1936). Contributions to the theory of testing statistical hypotheses. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 1–37.
- Percival, R. S. (2015). Confirmation versus falsificationism. In R. L. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (Vol. II, pp. 726–733). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.
- Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
- Popper, K. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growht of knowledge (pp. 51–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Kozak, M. J., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2010). Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631–639.
- Skodol, A. E., Morey, L. C., Bender, D. S., & Oldham, J. M. (2013). The ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 342–349. doi: 10.1037/per0000029
- van Fraassen, B. C. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Zimmerman, M. (2013). What is ironic about wanting empirical support to justify changes in diagnostic criteria? Commentary on ‘The ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5’. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 352–353. doi:10.1037/per0000048