Tribalism in War and Peace: The Nature and Evolution of Ideological Epistemology and Its Significance for Modern Social Science

References

• Aboud, F. E. (1988). Children and prejudice. New York: B. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Aboud, F. E. (2003). The formation of in-group favoritism and out-group prejudice in young children: Are they distinct attitudes? Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 48–60. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, S. I., Gomes, B., & Abramowitz, C. V. (1975). Publish or politic: Referee bias in manuscript review 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 187–200. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb00675.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–91). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., & Nielsen, H. S. (2016). Reading intervention with a growth mindset approach improves children’s skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(43), 12111–12113. doi:10.1073/pnas.1607946113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson, I. G. (2018). Partisanship, political knowledge, and the Dunning‐Kruger effect. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1173–1192. doi:10.1111/pops.12490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (1997). Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(1), 63–84. doi:10.1007/s11948-997-0017-3
   Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Ginges, J. (2012). Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science (New York, N.Y.), 336(6083), 855–857. doi:10.1126/science.1216902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). An unintentional, robust, and replicable pro-Black bias in social judgment. Social Cognition, 34(1), 1–39. doi:10.1521/soco.2016.34.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahník, Š., & Vranka, M. A. (2017). Growth mindset is not associated with scholastic aptitude in a large sample of university applicants. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 139–143. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2019). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats: Evidence from three replications. PsyArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., Wu, J., Antonellis, C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2018). Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: In-group favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US national election. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(4), 797–818. doi:10.1177/0022002716658694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., Albright, L., & Malloy, T. E. (1995). Effects of behavioral and social class information on social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 308–315. doi:10.1177/0146167295214001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J., & Jost, J. T. (2019). False equivalence: Are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 292–303. doi:10.1177/1745691618788876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 70(1), 1–16. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2018). Human self as information agent: Functioning in a social environment based on shared meanings. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 36–47. doi:10.1037/gpr0000114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawer, B. (2012). The victims’ revolution: The rise of identity studies and the closing of the liberal mind. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B. P., Stephane, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 153–170. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, K. M., & Wright, J. P. (2011). The association between county-level IQ and county-level crime rates. Intelligence, 39(1), 22–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff, P. (2019). Posting about politics? –44.6% of people find you’re annoying. Comparitech. Retrieved from https://www.comparitech.com/internet-providers/political-posts-on-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Block, K., Croft, A., De Souza, L., & Schmader, T. (2019). Do people care if men don’t care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 112–131. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, M. (2019, May 9). Republicans are hall-of-fame hypocrites. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/09/republicans-believe-presidential-power-only-when-president-is-republican/
   Google Scholar
• Boudry, M., & Vlerick, M. (2014). Natural selection does care about truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(1), 65–77. doi:10.1080/02698595.2014.915651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., Beaver, K. M., Haynes, R. D., Nedelec, J. L., & Gibson, C. L. (2015). A unified crime theory: The evolutionary taxonomy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 343–353. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. doi:10.1111/pops.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324(5932), 1293–1298. doi:10.1126/science.1168112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Burkart, D., Jost, J. T. & Van Bavel, J. J. (2018). An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1802–1813. doi:10.1037/xge0000532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. doi:10.1177/0963721413510932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannon, L. A., Tagler, M. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2007). The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 611–617. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679–1686. doi:10.1177/014616702237649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & von Hippel, W. (2018). Psychological barriers to evolutionary psychology: Ideological bias and coalitional adaptations. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 148–158. doi:10.1037/arc0000049
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824. doi:10.1037/a0037963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2018). The rise of victimhood culture: Microaggressions, safe spaces, and the new culture wars. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Worldview implications of believing in free will and/or determinism: Politics, morality, and punitiveness. Journal of Personality, 81(2), 130–141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00799.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Peters, D., & Plotkin, J. (1992). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues & strategies in clinical research (pp. 687–704). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149. doi:10.1177/0956797612447820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choma, B. L., Sumantry, D., & Hanoch, Y. (2019). Right-wing ideology and numeracy: A perception of greater ability, but poorer performance. Judgment & Decision Making, 14, 412–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, D. P., & Kriner, D. L. (2017). Constitutional qualms or politics as usual? The factors shaping public support for unilateral action. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 335–349. doi:10.1111/ajps.12262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuk, D. J., & Yost, B. A. (2016). The effects of issue salience, elite influence, and policy content on public opinion. Political Communication, 33(2), 328–345. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1017629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, R. L., & Ensley, M. J. (2016). Motivated reasoning and yard-sign-stealing partisans: Mine is a likable rogue, yours is a degenerate criminal. Political Behavior, 38(2), 317–335. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9313-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Ditto, P. H. (2017). Making punishment palatable: Belief in free will alleviates punitive distress. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 193–211. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. J., Chen, E. E., & Ditto, P. H. (2015). Moral coherence processes: Constructing culpability and consequences. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 123–128. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Winegard, B. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2019). Tribalism is human nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 587–592. doi:10.1177/0963721419862289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. J., Luguri, J. B., Ditto, P. H., Knobe, J., Shariff, A. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Free to punish: A motivated account of free will belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 501–513. doi:10.1037/a0035880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. J., Winegard, B. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2019). Motivated free will belief: The theory, new (preregistered) studies, and three meta-analyses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Cofnas, N. (2016). Science is not always “self-correcting”. Foundations of Science, 21(3), 477–492. doi:10.1007/s10699-015-9421-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. doi:10.1111/jcom.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, T. P., Crawford, J. T., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). No evidence for ideological asymmetry in dissonance avoidance. Social Psychology, 48(3), 123–134. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, L. G. III., Gornick, L. J., Houck, S. C., Anderson, C., Stockert, J., Sessoms, D., & McCue, K. (2016). Are conservatives really more simple‐minded than liberals? The domain specificity of complex thinking. Political Psychology, 37(6), 777–798. doi:10.1111/pops.12304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, III. L. G., Houck, S. C., Gornick, L. J., & Repke, M. A. (2018). Finding the Loch Ness monster: Left‐wing authoritarianism in the United States. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1049–1067. doi:10.1111/pops.12470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, J. F., Jago, C. P., & Higgins, E. T. (2019). When group influence is more or less likely: The case of moral judgments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 386–395. doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1666394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, T., & Lilienfeld, S. (2019). A new, multidimensional self-report instrument, the LWA Index, appears to measure a notoriously elusive construct: Left-wing authoritarianism. Retrieved from https://osf.io/buwh7/.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2014). Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology, 35(6), 841–851. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 20–33. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., De Smedt, J., & Blancke, S. (2011). Evolutionary approaches to epistemic justification. Dialectica, 65(4), 517–535. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keersmaecker, J., & Roets, A. (2019). Is there an ideological asymmetry in the moral approval of spreading misinformation by politicians? Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 165–169. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarree, K. G., Clark, C. J., Wheeler, S. C., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2017). On the pursuit of desired attitudes: Wanting a different attitude affects information processing and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 129–142. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Clark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., … Zinger, J. F. (2019). Partisan bias and its discontents. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 304–316. doi:10.1177/1745691618817753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., … Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., & Mastronarde, A. J. (2009). The paradox of the political maverick. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 295–298. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2016). Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103–116. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e130. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14000430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Carey, S. (2011). Consequences of “minimal” group affiliations in children. Child Development, 82(3), 793–811. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01577.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupree, C. H., & Fiske, S. T. (2019). Self-presentation in interracial settings: The competence downshift by White liberals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 579–604. doi:10.1037/pspi0000166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1915/1965). The elementary forms of religious life. (J. W. Swain, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House Digital, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. doi:10.1177/1745691618804166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eitan, O., Viganola, D., Inbar, Y., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2018). Is research in social psychology politically biased? Systematic empirical tests and a forecasting survey to address the controversy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 188–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, L. (2017). Race/ethnicity and criminal behavior: Neurohormonal influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 34–58. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1992). Postscript on ability tests, testing, and public policy. Psychological Science, 3, 278–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, J. A., Clark, C. J., Meindl, P., Luguri, J., Earp, B. D., Ditto, P., … Shariff, A. (2019). Political differences in free will are driven by differences in moralization. Manuscript Submitted for Publication. Washington D.C: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39, 3–48. doi:10.1111/pops.12477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueredo, A. J., & Rushton, J. P. (2009). Evidence for shared genetic dominance between the general factor of personality, mental and physical health, and life history traits. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(6), 555–563. doi:10.1375/twin.12.6.555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade‐offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18(2), 255–297. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 25–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522–559. doi:10.1037/pspa0000160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foubert, J. D., Brosi, M. W., & Bannon, R. S. (2011). Pornography viewing among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance and behavioral intent to commit sexual assault. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 18, 212–231. doi:10.1080/10720162.2011.625552
   Google Scholar
• Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). False memories of fabricated political events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 280–286. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimer, J. A., Brandt, M. J., Melton, Z., & Motyl, M. (2019). Extremists on the left and right use angry, negative language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1216–1231. doi:10.1177/0146167218809705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, R. G. Jr, (2019). An empirical analysis of racial differences in police use of force. Journal of Political Economy, 127(3), 1210–1261. doi:10.1086/701423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampa, A., Wojcik, S. P., Motyl, M., Nosek, B. A., & Ditto, P. H. (2019). (Ideo) logical reasoning: Ideology impairs sound reasoning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 1075–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Gat, A. (2015). Proving communal warfare among hunter‐gatherers: The quasi‐rousseauan error. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 24(3), 111–126. doi:10.1002/evan.21446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (2005). Origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gelpi, R., Cunningham, W. A., & Buchsbaum, D. (in press). Belief as a non-epistemic adaptive benefit. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethe, J. W. (1809/1966). Elective affinities. Chicago, IL: Gateway Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (2007). Applying double standards to “divisive” ideas: Commentary on Hunt and Carlson (2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 216–220. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2011). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). New York, NY: APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, N., & Fosse, E. (2012). Why are professors liberal? Theory and Society, 41(2), 127–168. doi:10.1007/s11186-012-9163-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological review, 108(4), 814–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., & Halperin, E. (2018). Are liberals and conservatives equally motivated to feel empathy toward others? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(10), 1449–1459. doi:10.1177/0146167218769867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed independents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1437–1452. doi:10.1177/0146167212452313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehman, E., Flake, J. K., & Calanchini, J. (2018). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 393–401. doi:10.1177/1948550617711229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19(4), 309–313. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X., & Peterson, J. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 655–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffarth, M. R., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2019). Political conservatism and the exploitation of non-human animals: An application of System Justification Theory. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22, 858–878.
   Google Scholar
• Houck, S. C., & Conway, III L. G. (2019). Strategic communication and the integrative complexity‐ideology relationship: Meta‐analytic findings reveal differences between public politicians and private citizens in their use of simple rhetoric. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1119–1141. doi:10.1111/pops.12583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. (1999). The new know-nothings: The political foes of the scientific study of human nature. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, E., & Carlson, J. (2007). Considerations relating to the study of group differences in intelligence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 194–213. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 496–503. doi:10.1177/1745691612448792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544. doi:10.1177/1948550611429024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, C. H., Hornsey, M. J., Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., & Bain, P. G. (2012). The David and Goliath principle: Cultural, ideological, and attitudinal underpinnings of the normative protection of low-status groups from criticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1053–1065. doi:10.1177/0146167212444454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. J., Tress, T., Burkel, N., Taylor, C., & Cesario, J. (2019). Officer characteristics and racial disparities in fatal officer-involved shootings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(32), 15877–15882. doi:10.1073/pnas.1903856116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H. B., Jr, Furnham, A., & Deile, A. J. (2010). Religious orientation and the Protestant work ethic. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 697–706. doi:10.1080/13674670802111862
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. J., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12710–12715. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402280111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. J., Sommers, R., Bloom, P., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Why do we hate hypocrites? Evidence for a theory of false signaling. Psychological Science, 28(3), 356–368. doi:10.1177/0956797616685771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B. A., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, J. (2014). Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(1), 56–81. doi:10.1037/a0033220
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L. (2012). Liberal privilege in academic psychology and the social sciences: Commentary on Inbar & Lammers (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 504–507. doi:10.1177/1745691612455205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Stevens, S. T., & Duarte, J. L. (2016). Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 116–133. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L, (2019, Jun 23). Scientific bias in favor of studies finding gender bias. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201906/scientific-bias-in-favor-studies-finding-gender-bias.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., Evans, D., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2012). They saw a protest: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64, 851–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.2
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. S., & Cooper, R. S. (2001). Commentary: Considerations for use of racial/ethnic classification in etiologic research. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(4), 291–298. doi:10.1093/aje/154.4.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. W. (2019). Analyzing change in network polarization. New Media & Society, 21, 1380–1402. doi:10.1177/1461444818822813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Gutierres, S. E., & Goldberg, L. L. (1989). Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(2), 159–167. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, D., & Mummolo, J. (2019). Making inferences about racial disparities in police violence. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3431132 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431132.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, J. J. (1993). The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(1), 28–55. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleva, S. P. (2011). Birds of a moral feather: The role of morality in romantic attraction and relationship satisfaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kopko, K. C., Bryner, S. M., Budziak, J., Devine, C. J., & Nawara, S. P. (2011). In the eye of the beholder? Motivated reasoning in disputed elections. Political Behavior, 33(2), 271–290. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9133-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kteily, N. S., Rocklage, M. D., McClanahan, K., & Ho, A. K. (2019). Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(5), 1559–1568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R., & Christner, J. (2011). Are supernatural beliefs commitment devices for integroup conflict. ? In J. Forgas, A. Kruglanski, & K. Williams (Eds.), The 13th Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology: Social Conflict and aggression (pp. 285–300). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 187–208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 612–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. (1978). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. doi:10.2307/3088434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, B. L., & Cronk, L. (2017). Coordinated policy action and flexible coalitional psychology: How evolution made humans so good at politics. Cognitive Systems Research, 43, 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2019). Policy over party: Comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–8. doi:10.1017/psrm.2019.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon, J. (2019, June 19). Evangelical Trump supporter insists criticism of Bill Clinton wasn’t based on character, despite saying that it was. Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/evangelical-ralph-reed-hypocrite-trump-support-1444859.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). What dilemma? Moral evaluation shapes factual belief. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 316–323. doi:10.1177/1948550612456045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, F., & Dobzhansky, T. (1962). On the non-existence of human races. Current Anthropology, 3(3), 279–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, B. J., & Kteily, N. S. (2018). (Anti-) egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 665–692. doi:10.1037/pspa0000112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(2), 161–175. doi:10.1007/BF01173636
   Google Scholar
• Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 156–188. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. doi:10.1037/a0036170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. N. (2011). Why religion is natural and science is not. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motyl, M., Prims, J., & Iyer, R. (in press). How ambient cues facilitate political segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616721987514. doi:10.1177/0146167219875141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, G. D., Lasane, T. P., & Leary, S. P. (2010). Political partisan prejudice: Selective distortion and weighting of evaluative categories in college admissions applications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(9), 2434–2462. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, G. D., & Munro, C. A. (2014). “Soft” versus “hard” psychological science: Biased evaluations of scientific evidence that threatens or supports a strongly held political identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(6), 533–543. doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.960080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, G. D., Weih, C., & Tsai, J. (2010). Motivated suspicion: Asymmetrical attributions of the behavior of political ingroup and outgroup members. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 173–184. doi:10.1080/01973531003738551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., Loftus, E. F., Grady, R. H., Levine, L. J., & Greene, C. M. (2019). False memories for fake news during Ireland’s abortion referendum. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1449–1459. doi:10.1177/0956797619864887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najle, M., & Jones, R. P. (2019, February 22). PPRI. Retrieved from https://www.prri.org/research/american-democracy-in-crisis-the-fate-of-pluralism-in-a-divided-nation/
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. doi:10.1037/a0012702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis) trust science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 36–66. doi:10.1177/0002716214555474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dea, C. J., Bueno, A. M. C., & Saucier, D. A. (2018). Social vigilantism and the extremity, superiority, and defense of attitudes toward climate change. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, L. R., & Green, J. C. (2006). The religion gap. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 455–459. doi:10.1017/S1049096506060860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortoleva, P., & Snowberg, E. (2015). Are conservatives overconfident? European Journal of Political Economy, 40, 333–344. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2019). On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019a). Cognitive reflection and the 2016 US Presidential election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 224–239. doi:10.1177/0146167218783192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019b). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521–2526. doi:10.1073/pnas.1806781116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019c). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary political psychology: On the origin and structure of heuristics and biases. Political Psychology, 36, 45–78. doi:10.1111/pops.12237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., & Ramsøy, T. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9213-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew (2014). Section 1: Media sources: Distinct favorites emerge on the left and right. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-1-media-sources-distinct-favorites-emerge-on-the-left-and-right/
   Google Scholar
• Picho, K., Rodriguez, A., & Finnie, L. (2013). Exploring the moderating role of context on the mathematics performance of females under stereotype threat: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 299–333. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.737380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietraszewski, D., Curry, O. S., Petersen, M. B., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2015). Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system. Cognition, 14, 24–39. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: A history of violence and humanity. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proch, J., Elad‐Strenger, J., & Kessler, T. (2019). Liberalism and conservatism, for a change! Rethinking the association between political orientation and relation to societal change. Political Psychology, 40(4), 877–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202286008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. (2015). Political realism: How hacks, machines, big money, and back-room deals can strengthen American Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, R. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56(3), 205–215. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinero, D. A., Wills, J., Brady, W. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Crawford, J. V., & Bavel, J. J. (2019). Is the political slant of psychology research related to scientific replicability? Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Relethford, J. H. (2009). Race and global patterns of phenotypic variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 139(1), 16–22. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienzo, C., Rolfe, H., & Wilkinson, D. (2015). Changing mindsets: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581132.
   Google Scholar
• Risch, N., Burchard, E., Ziv, E., & Tang, H. (2002). Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease. Genome Biology, 3(7), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. (2008). Why people are reluctant to tempt fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 293–307. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2), 79–94. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, C. G., Moskowitz, J. P., Salem, R. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2017). Partisan selective exposure: The role of party, ideology and ideological extremity over time. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 254–271. doi:10.1037/tps0000121
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, S., Lichter, S. R., & Nevitte, N. (2005). Politics and professional advancement among college faculty. The Forum, 3(1), Article 2. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1067
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(4), 441–452. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90137-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Raudenbush, S. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 224–232. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.037705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, M. J. (2004). Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1485–1493. doi:10.1177/0146167204264481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 366–385. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1147–1163. doi:10.1177/0146167215591501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 38–47. doi:10.1177/1745691610393528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle, J. E., Dawes, C. T., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). The heritability of partisan attachment. Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 601–613. doi:10.1177/1065912908327607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewach, O. R., Sackett, P. R., & Quint, S. (2019). Stereotype threat effects in settings with features likely versus unlikely in operational test settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1514–1534. doi:10.1037/apl0000420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. doi:10.1177/0956797617739704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29(1), 29–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideology. Political Psychology, 32(3), 369–397. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00821.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, E., Schinkel, M. G., & Moore, C. (2017). Affiliation affects generosity in young children: The roles of minimal group membership and shared interests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 242–262. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, Q. (2014). A radical solution to the race problem. Philosophy of Science, 81(5), 1025–1038. doi:10.1086/677694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of african americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, R. L., Reyna, C., Wetherell, G., & Iverson, G. (2019). Contempt of congress: Do liberals and conservatives harbor equivalent negative emotional biases towards ideologically congruent vs. incongruent politicians at the level of individual emotions? Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 100–123. doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.822
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, K. (2009). Three kinds of “conservatism”. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), 142–159. doi:10.1080/10478400903028615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. T., Jussim, L., Anglin, S. M., Contrada, R., Welch, C. A., Labrecque, J. S., … Edlund, J. (2017). Political exclusion and discrimination in social psychology: Lived experiences and solutions. In J. T. Crawford & L. Jussim (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology series: The politics of social psychology (pp. 220–254). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart-Williams, S., Thomas, A., Blackburn, J. D., & Chan, C. Y. M. (2019). Reactions to male-favoring vs. female-favoring sex differences: A preregistered experiment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement?. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylwester, K., & Purver, M. (2015). Twitter language use reflects psychological differences between democrats and republicans. PLoS One, 10(9), e0137422. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C. R., & Rogers, T. (2017). On the misplaced politics of behavioural policy interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(7), 0130. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions? Political Psychology, 15(3), 509–529. doi:10.2307/3791569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320–324. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00135-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, J. (2011, February 7). Social scientist sees bias within. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/science/08tier.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231–255. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In H. Høgh-Olesen (Ed.), Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 91–234). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2008). The nonverbal expression of pride: Evidence for cross-cultural recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 516–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., & Crocker, J. (2002). Race and self-esteem: Meta-analyses comparing whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians. Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 371–408. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 476–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven, L., Judd, C. M., & Sherman, D. K. (2012). Political polarization projection: Social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 84–100. doi:10.1037/a0028145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lange, P. A., Rinderu, M. I., & Bushman, B. J. (2017). Aggression and violence around the world: A model of CLimate, Aggression, and Self-control in Humans (CLASH). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–58. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16000406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, W., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Do ideologically driven scientific agendas impede the understanding and acceptance of evolutionary principles in social psychology. In J. T. Crawford & L. Jussim. Frontiers of Social Psychology Series: The Politics of Social Psychology (pp. 7–25). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 1–56. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10001354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, R. (2017). New Wakefield research study: The Trump effect on American relationships. Retrieved from https://www.wakefieldresearch.com/blog/2017/05/10/new-wakefield-research-study-trump-effect-american-relationships.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 972–980. doi:10.1177/1948550617731500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Iyer, R., Young, L., Graham, J. (2016). Ideological differences in the expanse of empathy. In P. Valdesolo & J. Graham, (Eds.), Claremont symposium on applied social psychology series. Social psychology of political polarization (pp. 61–77). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158. doi:10.1177/1745691615569849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, G. A., Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 658–667. doi:10.1177/1948550613476096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. D., & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(4), 264–269. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winegard, B. M., Clark, C. J., & Bunnel, E. (2019). The ideology of censorship. Manuscript submitted for publicartion.
   Google Scholar
• Winegard, B. M., Clark, C. J., Hasty, C. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). Equalitarianism: A source of liberal bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Winegard, B. M., & Winegard, B. (2015). A social science without sacred values. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Winegard, B., & Winegard, B. (2017). Paranoid egalitarian meliorism: An account of political bias in the social sciences. In J. T. Crawford & L. Jussim (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology series: The politics of social psychology (pp. 193–209). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winegard, B., Winegard, B., & Boutwell, B. (2017). Human biological and psychological diversity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 159–180. doi:10.1007/s40806-016-0081-5
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. S. (2018). Friends divided: John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wrangham, R. W., & Glowacki, L. (2012). Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 23(1), 5–29. doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9132-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrangham, R. W. (2018). Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(2), 245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, M. D., & Brown, R. (1992). Self, ‐evaluations intergroup attitudes in children aged three to nine. Child Development, 63, 619–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2019). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/xge0000661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar