Built on Uneven Ground: How Masculine Defaults Disadvantage Women in Political Leadership

References

• Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267. doi:10.1037/a0017094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. V. (2002). From spouses to candidates: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Elizabeth Dole, and the gendered office of U.S. President. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 5(1), 105–132. doi:10.1353/rap.2002.0001
   Google Scholar
• Astor, M. (2018). For female candidates, Harassment and threats come every day. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/24/us/politics/women-harassment-elections.html
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D., Beaulieu, E., & Saxton, G. W. (2018). Restoring trust in the police: Why female officers reduce suspicions of corruption. Governance, 31(1), 143–161. doi:10.1111/gove.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdahl, J. L., Cooper, M., Glick, P., Livingston, R. W., & Williams, J. C. (2018). Work as a masculinity contest. Journal of Social Issues, 74(3), 422–448. doi:10.1111/josi.12289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy, M., Rogers, L. E., Glaser, D., Wong, Y. L. A., Abraham, D., & Cosman, P. C. (2017). Gender in engineering departments: Are there gender differences in interruptions of academic job talks? Social Sciences, 6(1), 29. doi:10.3390/socsci6010029
   Google Scholar
• Bleiweis, R., & Phadke, S. (2021). The state of women’s leadership—And how to continue changing the face of U.S. politics. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/women/news/2021/01/15/494672/state-womens-leadership-continue-changing-face-u-s-politics/.
   Google Scholar
• Brechenmacher, S. (2018). Tackling women’s underrepresentation in U.S. politics: Comparative perspectives from Europe. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. doi:10.1177/0001839212439994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 415–428. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W., & Murray, F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(12), 4427–4431. doi:10.1073/pnas.1321202111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A., Smith, N., & Campbell, K. P. (2019). May the best woman win?: Education and bias against women in American politics. Retrieved from https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/Women_in_Politics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Case, K. A. (2012). Discovering the privilege of whiteness: White women’s reflections on anti‐racist identity and ally behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 78–96. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–576. doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A., Blair-Loy, M., & Rogers, L. (2018). Recognizing chilliness: How schemas of inequality shape views of culture and climate in work environments. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 6(1), 125–160. doi:10.1057/s41290-016-0019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for American Women and Politics. (2021a). Current Numbers. Center for American Women and Politics. Retrieved from https://cawp.rutgers.edu/current-numbers
   Google Scholar
• Center for American Women and Politics. (2021b). Women in the U.S. Congress 2021. Retrieved from https://cawp.rutgers.edu/women-us-congress-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., & Markus, H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. doi:10.1037/rev0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2001). Social movements and the focus of emotional attention. In J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics (pp. 27–43). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J., Kelly, E. L., O’Connor, L. T., & Williams, J. C. (2014). Redesigning, redefining work. Work and Occupations, 41(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/0730888413515250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1189–1197. doi:10.1177/0956797614527113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, M. A., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2018). The Pitfalls and Promise of Increasing Racial Diversity: Threat, Contact, and Race Relations in the 21st Century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 188–193. doi:10.1177/0963721417727860
   Google Scholar
• Dabbous, Y., & Ladley, A. (2010). A spine of steel and a heart of gold: Newspaper coverage of the first female Speaker of the House. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(2), 181–194. doi:10.1080/09589231003695971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, T. L., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2020). Mixed signals: The unintended effects of diversity initiatives. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 152–181. doi:10.1111/sipr.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducat, S. (2004). The wimp factor: Gender gaps, holy wars, and the politics of anxious masculinity. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. (2020). Working mothers’ second shift, personal resources, and self-care. Community, Work & Family, 23(1), 62–18. doi:10.1080/13668803.2018.1449732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2010). An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 3–34. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exley, C., & Kessler, J. (2019). The gender gap in self-promotion (Working Paper No. 26345; Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, A. C. (2007). French and feminine: Hegemonic masculinity and the emasculation of John Kerry in the 2004 presidential race. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(2), 132–150. doi:10.1080/07393180701262743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. (2010). Bound: Print journalism’s framing of female candidates in the 2008 presidential race according to the ‘double blind’ theory. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 1(2), 17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Garr-Schultz, A., & Gardner, W. L. (2018). Strategic self-presentation of women in STEM. Social Sciences, 7(2), 20. doi:10.3390/socsci7020020
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, B., Trimble, L., Wagner, A., Raphael, D., & Sampert, S. (2017). Political battlefield: Aggressive metaphors, gender, and power in news coverage of Canadian party leadership contests. Feminist Media Studies, 17(6), 1088–1103. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1315734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Berdahl, J. L., & Alonso, N. M. (2018). Development and validation of the masculinity contest culture scale. Journal of Social Issues, 74(3), 449–476. doi:10.1111/josi.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golash-Boza, T., Duenas, M. D., & Xiong, C. (2019). White supremacy, patriarchy, and global capitalism in migration studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(13), 1741–1759. doi:10.1177/0002764219842624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. V., Galinsky, A. D., & Phillips, K. W. (2015). Gender profiling: A gendered race perspective on person-position fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 853–868. doi:10.1177/0146167215580779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, A., & Rubin, B. (2015). Influence of communication partner’s gender on language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 46–64. doi:10.1177/0261927X14533197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. doi:10.2307/1341787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsin, J. (2020). Toxic White masculinity, post-truth politics and the COVID-19 infodemic. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 1060–1068. doi:10.1177/1367549420944934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. (2008). Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia, 23(2), 210–223. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01195.x
   Google Scholar
• Herrnson, P. S., Lay, J. C., & Stokes, A. K. (2003). Women running “as women”: Candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter-targeting strategies. The Journal of Politics, 65(1), 244–255. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, P.-H., Huang, C.-W., Lin, C.-Y., & Yen, J.-F. (2016). CEO overconfidence and financial crisis: Evidence from bank lending and leverage. Journal of Financial Economics, 120(1), 194–209. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., & Obodaru, O. (2009). Women and the vision thing. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2009/01/women-and-the-vision-thing
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, T., & Schweers, D. (2017). Female Supreme Court justices are interrupted more by male justices and advocates. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/04/female-supreme-court-justices-are-interrupted-more-by-male-justices-and-advocates
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, K. S. (1993). From mammy to Miss America and beyond: Cultural images and the shaping of US social policy (1st ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, P. D., Wakslak, C. J., Appel, G., & Huang, L. (2020). Gender differences in communicative abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 417–435. doi:10.1037/pspa0000177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, P. (2021). Lawmakers are still struggling with the trauma of the Capitol riot. Pelosi is trying to help. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/pelosi-ptsd-capitol-riots/2021/01/30/c728b47e-6274-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. (2016). Man enough?: Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the politics of presidential masculinity. Northampton, MA: Interlink Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290. doi:10.1177/0003122411400056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, K. H. (2007). “Supporting our Black men”: Reproducing male privilege in a Black student political organization. Sociological Spectrum, 27(3), 257–274. doi:10.1080/02732170701206106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolev, J., Fuentes-Medel, Y., & Murray, F. (2019). Is blinded review enough? How gendered outcomes arise even under anonymous evaluation ((NBER Working Paper No. 25759). No. 25759). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzleben, D. (2020). Trump has weaponized masculinity as President. Here’s why it matters. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2020/10/28/928336749/trump-has-weaponized-masculinity-as-president-heres-why-it-matters.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L. (1997). The making of matriarchy: A comparison of Madonna and Margaret Thatcher. Journal of Gender Studies, 6(1), 33–42. doi:10.1080/09589236.1997.9960667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. M. (2017). White male power and privilege: The relationship between White supremacy and social class. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(4), 349–358. doi:10.1037/cou0000227
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23(4), 354–358. doi:10.1177/0956797611428079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. (1981). The uses of anger. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 9(3), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, N. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2010). “Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 443–454. doi:10.1177/0146167210362981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, M., & O’Connell, C. (2020). Perceptions of stereotypes applied to women who publicly communicate their STEM work. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–8. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00654-0
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A. (2007). The masculinity of the governator: Muscle and compassion in American politics. Gender & Society, 21(4), 461–480. doi:10.1177/0891243207303166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijs, J. (2018). Inequality is a problem of inference: How people solve the social puzzle of unequal outcomes. Societies, 8(64). doi:10.3390/soc8030064
   Google Scholar
• Miner, K. N., Walker, J. M., Bergman, M. E., Jean, V. A., Carter-Sowell, A., January, S. C., & Kaunas, C. (2018). From “her” problem to “our” problem: Using an individual lens versus a social-structural lens to understand gender inequity in STEM. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 267–290. doi:10.1017/iop.2018.7
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11(2), 140–151. doi:10.1037/a0018093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuru, A. K., & Arendt, C. E. (2019). Not so safe a space: Women activists of color’s responses to racial microaggressions by White women allies. Southern Communication Journal, 84(2), 85–98. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2018.1505940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., & Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluo, I. (2018). So you want to talk about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ondish, P., & Stern, C. (2018). Liberals possess more national consensus on political attitudes in the United States: An examination across 40 years. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 935–943. doi:10.1177/1948550617729410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe, C. J. (2017). Who is a real man? The gender of Trumpism. Masculinities & Social Change, 6(2), 119–141. doi:10.17583/mcs.2017.2745
   Google Scholar
• Pfafman, T. M., & McEwan, B. (2014). Polite women at work: Negotiating professional identity through strategic assertiveness. Women’s Studies in Communication, 37(2), 202–219. doi:10.1080/07491409.2014.911231
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, D. L. (2020). The anger gap: How race shapes emotion in politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., & Vachhani, S. J. (2020). Feminist ethics and women leaders: From difference to intercorporeality. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–11. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04526-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, L. (1991). Strong Feelings: Emotional Responses to Presidents. Political Behavior, 13(1), 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, R. (2021). Do Better: Spiritual Activism for Fighting and Healing from White Supremacy. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, J. & Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647. doi:10.1017/S0047404517000562
   Google Scholar
• Rosenwasser, S. M., & Dean, N. G. (1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(1), 77–85. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00986.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross-Smith, A., & Kornberger, M. (2004). Gendered rationality? A genealogical exploration of the philosophical and sociological conceptions of rationality, masculinity and organization. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(3), 280–305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157–176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Saud, L. H. (2020). Justifying social inequalities: The role of social Darwinism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1139–1155. doi:10.1177/0146167219896924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, L. F. (2020). Me and White Supremacy. Sourcebooks.
   Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., & Sedikides, C. (2018). State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 228–259. doi:10.1177/1088868317734080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., & McAndrew, T. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515–531. doi:10.1111/pops.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2018). Invisibility of Black women: Drawing attention to individuality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 141–158. doi:10.1177/1368430216663017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (2007). Passionate men, emotional women: Psychology constructs gender difference in the late 19th century. History of Psychology, 10(2), 92–110. doi:10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnova, M. (2018). Small hands, nasty women, and bad hombres: Hegemonic masculinity and humor in the 2016 presidential election. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–16. doi:10.1177/2378023117749380
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. K., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Kelly, C. M., Adragna, K., & Baines, K. (2018). The relationship between sexualized appearance and perceptions of women’s competence and electability. Sex Roles, 79(11–12), 671–682. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0898-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starck, J. G., Sinclair, S., & Shelton, J. N. (2021). How university diversity rationales inform student preferences and outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(16), e2013833118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2013833118
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/a0027143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, F. G., Plaut, V. C., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 116–133. doi:10.1177/0021886308314460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracqualursi, V. (2018). Joe Biden says he would “beat the hell” out of Trump if in high school. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump/index.html
   Google Scholar
• The Washington Post. (2018). Mikie Sherrill: “Grandfather” | Campaign 2018. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/mikie-sherrill-grandfather–campaign-2018/2018/02/06/f2cccfd4-0b6f-11e8-998c-96deb18cca19_video.html
   Google Scholar
• Tomz, M. R., & Weeks, J. L. P. (2020). Human rights and public support for war. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 182–194. doi:10.1086/705741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toosi, N. R., Mor, S., Semnani-Azad, Z., Phillips, K. W., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2019). Who can lean in? The intersecting role of race and gender in negotiations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(1), 7–21. doi:10.1177/0361684318800492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch, R., & Taris, T. W. (2014). The authentic worker’s well-being and performance: the relationship between authenticity at work, well-being, and work outcomes. The Journal of Psychology, 148(6), 659–681. doi:10.1080/00223980.2013.820684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, T. K., & Schermerhorn, N. E. C. (2021). Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(2), e2020589118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2020589118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victory Fund. (2021). Out on the trail: 2020 LGBTQ candidate demographics report. Retrieved from https://victoryfund.org/outonthetrail/
   Google Scholar
• Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(1), 1–29. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. L., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446. doi:10.1177/0956797613508412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. J., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2016). The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 165–197. doi:10.1037/bul0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, D. G. (2010). Why achievement motivation predicts success in business but failure in politics: The importance of personal control. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1637–1668. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00665.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, N. J. G. (2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar