References
- Anderson, E. (2015). The White space. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 10–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214561306
- Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287
- Brescoll, V. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994
- Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x
- Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambi- ent belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
- Coles, S. T., & Pasek, J. (2020). Intersectional invisibility revisited: How group prototypes lead to the erasure and exclusion of Black women. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2, 1–11.
- Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1) 139–167.
- Crenshaw, K. W. (2006). Framing affirmative action. Michigan Law Review First Impressions, 105, 123–133. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_fi/vol105/iss1/4
- Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010). The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication. Communication Research, 37(6), 857–875. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362683
- Dupree, C. H. (2021a). Words of a leader: An intersectional analysis of gender differences in leaders’ speech. New Haven, CT: School of Management, Yale University.
- Dupree, C. H. (2021b). Black and Latinx conservatives upshift competence relative to liberals in mostly-White settings. Nature Human Behavior. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01167-9
- Dupree, C. H., & Fiske, S. T. (2019). Self-presentation in interracial settings: The competence downshift by White liberals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 579–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000166
- Dupree, C. H., & Foster-Gimbel, O. (2021). Going for woke: White Americans downshift conservatism in interracial settings. New Haven, CT: School of Management, Yale University.
- Dupree, C. H., & Kraus, M. W. (in press). Psychological science is not race neutral. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
- Dupree, C. H., Torrez, B., Obioha, O., & Fiske, S.T. (2020). Race-status associations: Distinct effects of three novel measures among White and Black perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advance online publication.
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
- Fiske, S. T., & Dupree, C. (2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement_4), 13593–13597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111
- Goidel, R. K., Shields, T., & Peffley, M. (1997). Priming theory and RAS models: Toward an integrated perspective of media influence. American Politics Quarterly, 25(3), 287–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9702500303
- Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646
- Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
- Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (1982). All the women are White, all the Blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women’s studies. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.
- Hwang, Y., & Southwell, B. G. (2009). Science TV news exposure predicts science beliefs: Real world effects among a national sample. Communication Research, 36(5), 724–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338912
- King, E. B., Avery, D. R., Hebl, M. R., & Cortina, J. M. (2018). Systematic subjectivity: How subtle biases infect the scholarship review process. Journal of Management, 44(3), 843–853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317743553
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
- Lei, R. F., Leshin, R. A., & Rhodes, M. (2020). The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psychological Science, 31(8), 911–926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620920360
- Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science (New York, N.Y.), 347(6219), 262–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
- Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1993). Leadership and information processing. New York, NY: Unwin Hyman.
- Lord, R. G., & Emrich, C. G. (2000). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 551–579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00060-6
- Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6
- Lowery, B.S., Knowles, E.D., & Unzueta, M.M. (2007). Framing inequity safely: The motivated denial of White privilege. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(9), 1237–1250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303016
- Merritt, D. J., & Reskin, B. F. (1997). Sex, race, and credentials: The truth about affirmative action in law faculty hiring. Columbia Law Review, 97(2), 199–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1123365
- Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). Disruptions in women’s self-promotion: The backlash avoidance model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 186–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01561.x
- Mueller, J. C. (2020). Racial ideology or racial ignorance? An alternative theory of racial cognition. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 142–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926197
- Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
- Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math/= me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
- Onyeador, I. N., Hudson, S. T. J., & Lewis, N. A. Jr. (2021). Moving beyond implicit bias training: Policy insights for increasing organizational diversity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
- Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
- Ray, V. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335
- Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Loyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G. J., & Phillips, K. W. (2008). The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758–777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758
- Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
- Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2006). Interracial interactions: A relational approach. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 121–181). New York: Academic Press.
- Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
- Sue, D. W., Lin, A. I., & Rivera, D. P. (2009). Racial microaggressions in the workplace: Manifestation and impact. In J. L. Chin (Ed.), Diversity in mind and in action, Vol. 2. Disparities and competence (pp. 157–172). Westport, CT: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
- Sy, T., Shore, L. M., Strauss, J., Shore, T. H., Tram, S., Whiteley, P., & Ikeda-Muromachi, K. (2010). Leadership perceptions as a function of race-occupation fit: The case of Asian Americans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 902–919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019501
- Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
- Torrez, B., Dupree, C. H., & Kraus, M. (in press). Examining the racialized function of objectivity in management scholarship. In E. King, Q. Robertson, & M. Hebl (Eds.), Research on social issues in management (V. 3): The future of diversity & inclusion.
- Torrez, B., Dupree, C. H., & Kraus, M. (2021). Who tells your story: How race influences perceptions of objectivity in journalism. New Haven, CT: School of management, Yale University.
- Trawalter, S., Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 13(4), 243–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309345850
- Vorauer, J. D., Hunter, A., Main, K., & Roy, S. (2000). Concerns with evaluation and meta-stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690
- Yaros, R. A. (2006). Is it the medium or the message? Structuring complex news to enhance engagement and situational understanding by nonexperts. Communication Research, 33(4), 285–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206289154
- Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.