Eliza redux commentary on gerhardt and stinson

References

• Austin , J. L. 1962 . How to Do Things with Words , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Edelson , M. 1992 . Telling andEnacting Stories in Psychoanalysis , Edited by: Barron , J. , Eagle , M. and Wiletzky , D. Washington DC : American Psychological Assn .
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , C. . Pragmatic features of natural language . Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society . pp. 151 – 160 .
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , C. F. and Kalmar , D. A. “ You can't step in the same river twice: Repair and repetition in dialogue ” . In Repetition in Dialogue , Edited by: Bazzanella , C. Tubingen, GER : Max Niemeyer . (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman , I. Z. 1991 . Discussion: Toward a social‐constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation . Psychoanal. Dial. , 1 : 74 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Labov , W. and Fanshel , D. 1977 . Therapeutic Discourse , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Levenson , E. 1989 . What ever happened to the cat? Interpersonal perspectives on the self . Contemp. Psychoanal. , 25 : 537 – 553 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin , K. 1935 . A Dynamic Theory of Personality , Edited by: Adams , D. K. and Zener , K. E. New York : McGraw Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Schafer , R. 1982 . The relevance of the “here and now”; transference interpretation to the reconstruction of early development . Internal J. Psycho‐Anal. , 63 : 77 – 82 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• _____ . 1983 . The Analytic Attitude , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• _____ . 1992 . Retelling a Life , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Spence , D. P. 1982 . Narrative Truth and Historical Truth , New York : Norton .
   Google Scholar
• Weizenbaum , J. 1966 . ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine . Computational Ling. , 9 : 36 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• 1I thank the Spencer Foundation for their support of this work, through the grant “Studies in Cultural Psychology”; to Jerome Bruner. Once I saw that, in order to explain what I thought was wrong with the discourse theory here, I would have to read a great deal of psychoanalytic literature and get help interpreting it, I called on three former students who are currently clinicians—Lisa Capps at UCLA, Leanh Nguyen at NYU, and Dr. Bobbi Renderer, who finished at CUNY. I don't know how they would feel about this version, as eventually I became embarrassed about imposing on them further, but I used their input, and I thank them all most heartily.
   Google Scholar