What Plurals and Compounds Reveal about Constraints in Word Formation

REFERENCES

• Alegre, Maria A. & Peter Gordon. 1996. Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition 60. 65–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alegre, Maria A. & Peter Gordon. 1999. Rule-based versus associative processes in derivational morphology. Brain and Language 68. 347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland & Chris R. Young. 2008. The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adult’s graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition 106. 87–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Hans van Rijn. 1993. CELEX lexical database. CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Berent, Iris & Steven Pinker. 2007. The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon 2. 129–181.
   Google Scholar
• Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer, Hagit. 1988. On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, 45–65. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 991–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Mayella Almazan. 2001. Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI). Lingua 111. 729–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald, Gary Marcus, Susanne Bartke & Richard Wiese. 1995. Compounding and inflection in German child language. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle ( eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 115–142. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cunnings, Ian & Harald Clahsen. 2007. The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition 104. 476–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Sciullo, Anne Marie & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, Rebecca L. 2007. Statistical learning in infant language development. In M. Gareth Gaskell ( ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 601–616. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Peter. 1985. Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition 21. 73–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Joseph H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg ( ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, Todd R., Maryellen C. MacDonald & Mark S. Seidenberg. 2003. Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology 47. 119–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith ( eds.), The structure of phonological representations, part 1, 131–175. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Lany, Jill & Jenny R. Saffran. 2010. From statistics to meaning: Infants’ acquisition of lexical categories. Psychological Science 21. 284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardiere, Donna. 1995. L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research 11. 20–56.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Victoria A. 2000. Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology. Language Learning 50. 153–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Victoria A. & Jennifer Hayes. 2010. Processing English compounds in the first and second language: The influence of the middle morpheme. Language Learning 60. 194–220.
   Google Scholar
• Oetting, Janna B. & Mabel L. Rice. 1993. Plural acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 1236–1248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, Michael & Melody Dye. 2010. Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology 62. 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutter, John-Sebastian. 2009. The appearance of plural inflection inside Dutch complex words. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht master’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, Mark S., Maryellen C. MacDonald & Todd R. Haskell. 2007. Semantics and phonology constrain compound formation. The Mental Lexicon 2. 287–312.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, Renita, Sabrina Gerth & Harald Clahsen. 2013. Morphological constraints in children’s spoken language comprehension: A visual world study of plurals inside compounds in English. Cognition 129. 457–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely, Heather K. J. & Valerie Christian. 2000. Lexical word formation in children with grammatical SLI: A grammar-specific versus an input-processing deficit? Cognition 75. 33–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukowski, Andrea. 2005. Knowledge of constraints on compounding in children and adolescents with Williams syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 48. 79–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar