Phonological learning with output-driven maps

References

• Akers, Crystal. 2012. Simultaneous learning of hidden structures by the commitment-based learner. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Apoussidou, Diana. 2007. The learnability of metrical phonology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Apoussidou, Diana & Paul Boersma. 2003. The learnability of Latin stress. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 25. 101–148.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology. The Hague, The Netherlands: Holland Academic Graphics.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul. 2003. Review of Tesar & Smolensky (2000). Phonology 20. 436–446.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• de Lacy, Paul ( see Lacy)
   Google Scholar
• Dresher, B. Elan. 1999. Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 27–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresher, B. Elan & Jonathan Kaye. 1990. A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34. 137–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, Mirjam & Harald Baayen. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79. 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, John. 1994. A dynamic computational theory of accent systems. In Jennifer Cole & Charles Kisseberth (eds.), Perspectives in phonology, 1–28. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Prahlad & David Touretzky. 1994. Connectionist models and linguistic theory: Investigations of stress systems in language. Cognitive Science 18. 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, Mark & Charles Reiss. 1997. Grammar optimization: The simultaneous acquisition of constraint ranking and a lexicon. Ms. Concordia University, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Bruce. 2004. Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: The early stages. In René Kager, Joe Pater & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition, 158–203. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, Jeffrey. 2009. On the role of locality in learning stress patterns. Phonology 26. 303–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz, Gaja. 2006. Rich lexicons and restrictive grammar—Maximum likelihood learning in Optimality Theory. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Jarosz, Gaja. 2013. Learning with hidden structure in Optimality Theory and Harmonic Grammar: Beyond Robust Interpretive Parsing. Phonology 30. 27–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 1984. A discovery procedure for certain phonological rules. In The Tenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics/Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 344–347. Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P84-1070.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kager, Rene. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kager, Rene, Joe Pater & Wim Zonneveld (eds.). 2004. Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff, Annemarie. 2007. Acquisition of morpho-phonology: The Dutch voicing alternation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Paul. 1971. Historical linguistics. In W. O. Dingwall (ed.), A survey of linguistic science, 576–649. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Linguistics Program.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Abstractness, opacity and global rules (Part 2 of “Phonological representations”). In O. Fujimura (eds.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory, 57–86. Tokyo: TEC.
   Google Scholar
• Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 291–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy, Paul de (ed.). 2007. The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John J. (ed.). 2004. Optimality Theory in phonology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John J. 2007. Derivations and levels of representation. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 99–117. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 79–154. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbancyzk (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 249–384. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Nazarré. 2008. Discovering underlying forms: Contrast pairs and ranking. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Nazarré & Bruce Tesar. 2008. Learning underlying forms by searching restricted lexical subspaces. In Proceedings of the Forty-First Conference of the Chicago Linguistics Society ( 2005), vol. II: The panels, 33–47. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Learning-Underlying-Forms-by-Searching-Restricted-Merchant-Tesar/619d520df0815461c4d3ec167495b89178ff1d6c/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, Lisa. 2011. When unbiased probabilistic learning is not enough: Acquiring a parametric system of metrical phonology. Language Acquisition 18. 87–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, Alan. 1990. Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. In Karen Deaton, Manuela Noske & Michael Ziolkowski (eds.), CLS26-II: Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, 355–398. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Alan. 2002. Entailed ranking arguments. Ms. Rutgers University–New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Alan & Bruce Tesar. 2004. Learning phonotactic distributions. In René Kager, Joe Pater & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition, 245–291. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthall, Sam. 1994. Vowel/glide alternation in a theory of constraint interaction. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce. 2004. Using inconsistency detection to overcome structural ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 219–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce. 2006a. Faithful contrastive features in learning. Cognitive Science 30. 863–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce. 2006b. Learning from paradigmatic information. In Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, 619–638. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce. 2007. Learnability. In Paul de Lacy (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 555–574. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce. 2014. Output-driven phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce, John Alderete, Graham Horwood, Nazarré Merchant, Koichi Nishitani & Alan Prince. 2003. Surgery in language learning. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 477–490. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce & Alan Prince. 2007. Using phonotactics to learn phonological alternations. In Johnathon E. Cihlar, Amy L. Franklin, David W. Kaiser & Irene Kimbara (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference of the Chicago Linguistics Society (2003), vol. II: The Panels, 209–237. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky. 1996. Learnability in Optimality Theory (long version). Technical Report JHU-CogSci-96-3, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky. 1998. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 229–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky. 2000. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, Kenneth & Peter Culicover. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar