Acquiring wanna: Beyond Universal Grammar

References

• Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine & Elena V. M. Lieven. 2014. Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn’t help. Language 90(3). e53–e90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoun, Joseph & David W. Lightfoot. 1984. Government and contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3). 465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, Lois, Jo Tackeff & Margaret Lahey. 1984. Learning to in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language 11(2). 391–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, Paul. 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4). 491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeckx, Cedric & Norbert Hornstein. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, Denis. 1986. Empty categories and the contraction debate. Linguistic Inquiry 17(1). 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnie, Andrew. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3). 425–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S. & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Everaert, Martin B. H., Marinus A. C. Huybregts, Noam Chomsky, Robert C. Berwick & Johan J. Bolhuis. 2015. Structures, not strings: Linguistics as part of the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(12). 729–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, Yehuda N. 2007. Do we wanna (or hafta) have empty categories? In M. Butt & T. H. King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference, 184–197. Stanford: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Janet Dean. 1998. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29(1). 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall Grant. 2017. Contraction. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Anne S. & Nick Chater. 2010. The logical problem of language acquisition: A probabilistic perspective. Cognitive Science 34(6). 972–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1980. Remarks on to-contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1). 239–245.
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory & William D. Raymond. 2000. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, Victor, Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez & Marc Brysbaert. 2012. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods 44(4). 978–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1970. Global rules. Language 46(3). 627–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Ping & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2000. The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David W. 1976. Trace theory and twice-moved NPs. Linguistic Inquiry 7(4). 559–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David W. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David W. 2006. Minimizing government: Deletion as cliticization. Linguistic Review 23(2). 97–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David W. 2017. Discovering new variable properties without parameters. Linguistic Analysis 41(3–4). 409–444.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: The database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mateu Martin, Victoria Eugenia. 2016. Intervention effects in the acquisition of raising and control: Evidence from English and Spanish. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Jonathan W. 2017. PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162(1–2). 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Postal, Paul M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1978. Traces and the description of English complementizer contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 9(1). 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postal, Paul M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1982. The contraction debate. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1). 122–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postal, Paul M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1986. Misgovernment. Linguistic Inquiry 17(1). 104–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1997. The morpholexical nature of English to-contraction. Language 73(1). 79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaeian, Mehrdad, Firooz Sadighi, Mortaza Yamini & Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri. 2017. Investigating “wanna” contraction through an emergentist approach among Iranian EFL learners applying usage-based model of language acquisition. Lingua 196. 55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Ian. 1997. Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28(3). 423–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sag, Ivan A. & Janet Dean Fodor. 1995. Extraction without traces. In R. Aranovich (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 365–384. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Yosuke. 2012. Multiple spell-out and contraction at the syntax-phonology interface. Syntax 15(3). 287–314.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Rosalind. 1990. Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, Virginia & Stephanie Aubry. 2005. When opportunity knocks twice: Two-year-olds’ repetition of sentence subjects. Journal of Child Language 32(3). 617–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, Marit. 2009. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5). 1023–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukowski, Andrea & Jaiva Larsen. 2011. Wanna contraction in children: Retesting and revising the developmental facts. Language Acquisition 18(4). 211–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar