Rule Generalization from Inconsistent Input in Early Infancy

References

• Afonso, Olivia, Domínguez, Alberto, Álvarez, Carlos J. & Morales, David. 2014. Sublexical and lexico-syntactic factors in gender access in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43. 13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Carl Lee 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10(4). 533–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Leslie B., Atkinson, Dan J. & Chaput, Harold H. 2000. Habit 2000: A new program for testing infant perception and cognition (Version 2.2.5c) [Computer software]. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Michael C., Slemmer, Jonathan A., Marcus, Gary F. & Johnson, Scott P. 2009. Information from multiple modalities helps 5-month-olds learn abstract rules. Developmental Science 12. 504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, Annie & J. Lidz, Jeffrey. 2014. Statistical insensitivity in the acquisition of Tsez noun classes. Language 90(1). 58–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, LouAnn, Dawson,Colin,Chatila, Razanne & Tenenbaum, Josh. 2014. Surprise! Infants consider possible bases of generalization for a single input example. Developmental Science 18. 80–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, LouAnn & Knight, Sara. 2015. Infants generalize from just (the right) four words. Cognition 143. 187–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, LouAnn. 2006. Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition 98. B67–B74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervain, Judit, Macagno, Francesco, Cogoi, S., Peña, Marcela & Mehler, Jacques. 2008. The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(37). 14222–14227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gervain, Judit, Berent, Iris & Werker, Janet F.. 2012. Binding at birth: The newborn brain detects identity relations and sequential position in speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(3). 564–574.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, Rebecca L. & Lakusta, Laura. 2004. A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. Developmental Science 7. 567–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson Kam, Carla L. & Newport, Elissa L. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1. 151–195.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Scott P., Fernandes, Keith J., Frank, Michael C., Kirkham, Natasha Z., Marcus, Gary F., Rabagliati, Hugh & Slemmer, Jonathan A. 2009. Abstract rule learning for visual sequences in 8- and 11-month-olds. Infancy 14. 2–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koulaguina, Elena & Shi, Rushen. 2010. The mechanism underlying the learning of rules and exceptions in 14month-old infants. In Katie Franich, Kate Mesh Iserman & Lauren Keil (Eds.), A Supplement to the Proceedings of the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD34], 1–13. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/34-Koulaguina-and-Shi-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Koulaguina, Elena & Shi, Rushen. 2013. Abstract rule learning in 11- and 14-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42(1). 71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, Jeffrey & Gagliardi, Annie. 2015. How nature meets nurture: Universal Grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, Gary F., Fernandes, Keith J. & Johnson, Scott P. 2007. Infant rule learning facilitated by speech. Psychological Science 18. 387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, Gary F., Vijayan, Subramanian, Bandi Rao, Shoba & Vishton, Peter M. 1999. Rule-learning in seven-month-old infants. Science 283. 77–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, Alexandra & Shi, Rushen. 2012. Initial morphological learning in preverbal infants. Cognition 122. 61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabagliati, Hugh, Senghas, Ann, Johnson, Scott & Marcus, Gary F. 2012. Infant rule learning: Advantage language, or advantage speech? PLoS ONE 7(7). e40517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, David E. & McClelland, James L. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In David E. Rumelhart & James  L. McClelland (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 2, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, Jenny R., Pollak, Seth D., Seibel, Rebecca L. & Shkolnik, Anna. 2007. Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language. Cognition 105. 669–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, Elizabeth & Newport, Elissa L. 2005. Novelty and regularization: The effect of novel instances on rule formation. In Alejna Brugos, Manuella R. Clark-Cotton & Seungwan Ha, (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD], 663–673. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, Elizabeth. 2011. Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners. Journal of Memory and Language 65. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, Elizabeth, Newport, Elissa L. & Tanenhaus, Michael K. 2008. Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology 56. 165–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles & Montrul, Silvina. 2017. Learning datives: The Tolerance Principle in first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research 33(1). 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2005. On productivity. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5(1). 265–302.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2016. The price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar