Filler-gap dependency comprehension at 15 months: The role of vocabulary

References

• Adani, F., H. K. Van der Lely, M. Forgiarini, and M. T. Guasti. 2010. “Grammatical Feature Dissimilarities Make Relative Clauses Easier: A Comprehension Study with Italian Children.” Lingua 120 (9):2148–66. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoshima, S., C. Phillips, and A. Weinberg. 2004. “Processing Filler-gap Dependencies in a Head-final Language.” Journal of Memory and Language 51 (1):23–54. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoun, J., N. Hornstein, and D. Sportiche. 1981. “Some Aspects of Wide Scope Quantification.” Journal of Linguistic Research 1 (3):69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Arnon, I. 2009. “Rethinking Child Difficulty: the Effect of NP Type on Children’s Processing of Relative Clauses in Hebrew.” Journal of Child Language 37 (01):27–57. doi:10.1017/S030500090900943X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom, L. 1970. Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. E., and S. R. Waxman. 2009. “A Horse of A Different Color: Specifying with Precision Infants’ Mappings of Novel Nouns and Adjectives.” Child Development 80 (1):15–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01370.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. L.-S. 2003. “Wh-in-situ.” Glot International 7 (4):103–09.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1977. “On Wh-Movement.” In Formal Syntax, edited by P. Culicover, A. Akmajian and Wasow, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, P., and G. Hermon. 1994. “Is There LF Wh-movement?” Linguistic Inquiry 25 (2):239–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S., and J. D. Fodor. 1985. “How Can Grammars Help Parsers.” In Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by D. Dowty, D. Kartunnen and A. M. Zwicky, 94–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J., H. B. T. Flusberg, K. Hakuta, and M. Cohen. 1979. “Children’s Comprehension of Relative Clauses.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8 (5):499–518. doi:10.1007/BF01067332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delle Luche, C., S. Durrant, S. Poltrock, and C. Floccia. 2015. “A Methodological Investigation of the Intermodal Preferential Looking Paradigm: Methods of Analyses, Picture Selection and Data Rejection Criteria.” Infant Behavior and Development 40:151–72. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., E. Bates, P. S. Dale, J. P. Hartung, S. J. Pethick, J. S. Reilly, … D. J. Thal. 1993. The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. Baltimore, MD: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C., Y. Gertner, R. M. Scott, and S. Yuan. 2010. “Syntactic Bootstrapping.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1 (2):143–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D. 1998. “Parsing to Learn.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27 (3):339–74. doi:10.1023/A:1023255705029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., and C. Clifton. 1989. “Successive Cyclicity in the Grammar and the Parser.” Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (2):93–126. doi:10.1080/01690968908406359.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., and G. B. F. d’Arcais. 1989. “Filler Driven Parsing: A Study of Gap Filling in Dutch.” Journal of Memory and Language 28 (3):331–44. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90037-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., A. Belletti, and L. Rizzi. 2009. “Relativized Relatives: Types of Intervention in the Acquisition of A-bar Dependencies.” Lingua 119 (1):67–88. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, A., T. M. Mease, and J. Lidz. 2016. “Discontinuous Development in the Acquisition of Filler-gap Dependencies: Evidence from 15-and 20-month-olds.” Language Acquisition 23 (3):1–27. doi:10.1080/10489223.2015.1115048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodluck, H., and S. Tavakolian. 1982. “Competence and Processing in Children’s Grammar of Relative Clauses.” Cognition 11 (1):1–27. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90002-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, H., and S. Crain. 1982. “Relative Acquisition.” Language Development 1:245–74.
   Google Scholar
• He, A. X., and J. Lidz. 2017. “Verb Learning in 14-and 18-month-old English-learning Infants.” Language Learning and Development 13: 335-356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollich, G. 2005. Supercoder: A Program for Coding Preferential Looking (version 1.5). West Lafayette: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, K.-S., and C. Fisher. 2014. “Early Evidence for Syntactic Bootstrapping: 15-month-olds Use Sentence Structure in Verb Learning.” In Proceedings of the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., and E. L. Bavin. 2002. “English-speaking Children’s Comprehension of Relative Clauses: Evidence for General-cognitive and Language-specific Constraints on Development.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (6):599–617. doi:10.1023/A:1021265021141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouider, S., J. Halberda, J. Wood, and S. Carey. 2006. “Acquisition of English Number Marking: the Singular-plural Distinction.” Language Learning and Development 2 (1):1–25. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0201_1.
   Google Scholar
• Labelle, M. 1990. “Predication, Wh-movement, and the Development of Relative Clauses.” Language Acquisition 1 (1):95–119. doi:10.1207/s15327817la0101_4.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, J., and L. R. Gleitman. 2004a. “Argument Structure and the Child’s Contribution to Language Learning.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (4):157–61. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, J., and L. R. Gleitman. 2004b. “Yes, We Still Need Universal Grammar.” Cognition 94 (1):85–93. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, J., A. S. White, and R. Baier. 2017. “The Role of Incremental Parsing in Syntactically Conditioned Word Learning.” Cognitive Psychology 97:62–78. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: the Database. Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Maye, J., J. F. Werker, and L. Gerken. 2002. “Infant Sensitivity to Distributional Information Can Affect Phonetic Discrimination.” Cognition 82 (3):101–11. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, T. H., E. L. Newport, and T. G. Bever. 2002. “The Distributional Structure of Grammatical Categories in Speech to Young Children.” Cognitive Science 26 (4):393–424. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2604_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, E., H. Gleitman, and L. Gleitman. 1977. “Mother, I’d Rather Do It Myself: Some Effects and Non-effects of Maternal Speech Style.” In Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition, edited by C. E. Snow and C. A. Ferguson. 109-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, L., N. H. Feldman, and J. Lidz. 2017. “Learning an Input Filter for Argument Structure Acquisition.” In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics. Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: the Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, T. 1998. “Wh-In-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program.” Natural Language Semantics 6 (1):29–56. doi:10.1023/A:1008240014550.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. R. (1967). “Constraints on variables in syntax ” Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Santelmann, L. M., and P. W. Jusczyk. 1998. “Sensitivity to Discontinuous Dependencies in Language Learners: Evidence for Limitations in Processing Space.” Cognition 69 (2):105–34. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00060-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., G. Hollich, and P. W. Jusczyk. 2003. “Early Understanding of Subject and Object Wh-Questions.” Infancy 4 (3):423–36. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0403_06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. 1974. “The Role of Parallel Function in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in English.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13 (3):272–81. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80064-2.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, R., J. F. Werker, and A. Cutler. 2006. “Recognition and Representation of Function Words in English-learning Infants.” Infancy 10 (2):187–98. doi:10.1207/s15327078in1002_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromswold, K. 1995. “The Acquisition of Subject and Object Wh-questions.” Language Acquisition 4 (1–2):5–48. doi:10.1080/10489223.1995.9671658.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes, P. 1974. “The Semantics of Children’s Language.” American Psychologist 29 (2):103. doi:10.1037/h0036026.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, R. S., and J. Sedivy. 2003. “The Time-course of Processing Syntactic Dependencies: Evidence from Eye Movements.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18 (2):143–63. doi:10.1080/01690960143000498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakolian, S. 1981. “The Conjoined-clause Analysis of Relative Clauses.” Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory 167–87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., and M. J. Pickering. 1996. “Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies: an Eye-tracking Study.” Journal of Memory and Language 35 (3):454–75. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valian, V. 1990. “Logical and Psychological Constraints on the Acquisition of Syntax.” In Language Processing and Language Acquisition, edited by L. Frazier and J. G. De Villiers. 119-145. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., and C. Phillips. 2014. “Going the Distance: Memory and Control Processes in Active Dependency Construction.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (7):1274–304. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.858363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar