Structural diversity does not affect the acquisition of recursion: The case of possession in German

References

• Ackermann, T. 2018. From genitive inflection to possessive marker?—The development of German possessive -s with personal names. In Tanja Ackermann, Horst J. Simon & Christian Zimmer (eds.), Germanic genitives, 189–230. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, Burcu, Annette Hohenberger & Rineke Verbrugge. 2017. Syntactic recursion facilitates and working memory predicts recursive Theory of Mind. PLoS ONE 12(1). e0169510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, Silke. 2004. The acquisition of relative clauses in German and English. The very first steps. Leipzig: University of Leipzig master’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Silke, Holger Diessel & Michael Tomasello. 2008. The acquisition of German relative clauses: A case study. Journal of Child Language 35. 325–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald. 1984. Der Erwerb von Kasusmarkierungen in der deutschen Kindersprache. Linguistische Berichte 89–90. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cournane, Ailís & Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux. 2020. Leaving obligations behind: Epistemic incrementation in preschool English. Language Learning & Development 16. 270–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbertson, Jennifer, Marieke Schouwstra & Simon Kirby. 2020. From the world to word order: Deriving biases in noun phrase order from statistical properties of the world. Language 96. 696–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1998. Possession in Germanic. In Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, 87–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Lyle Jenkins. 2016. Biolinguistics and the human language faculty. Language 92. 205–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenbeiss, Sonja, Ayumi Matsuo & Ingrid Sonnenstuhl. 2009. Learning to encode possession. In William B. McGregor (ed.), The expression of possession, 143–212. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, Peter. 1994. Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, Sarita L., Teresa A. Ukrainetz, Jennifer R. Hsu, Joan N. Kaderavek, Laura M. Justice & Ronald B. Gillam. 2008. Noun phrase elaboration in children’s spoken stories. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 39. 145–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, Jürg. 2004. A typology of relative clauses in German dialects. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 211–243. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119(1). 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendly, Michael. 1994. Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89. 190–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giblin, Iain, Peng Zhou, Cory Bill, Jiawei Shi & Stephen Crain. 2018. The spontaneous eMERGEnce of recursion in child language. In Megan M. Brown & Brady Dailey (eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 43], 270–285. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoroglou, Mirto & Anna Papafragou. 2019. Interactive contexts increase informativeness in children’s referential communication. Developmental Psychology 55(5). 951–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, Hannelore. 2001. Sprachentwicklungstest für drei- bis fünfjährige Kinder (SETK 3-5). Diagnose von Sprachverarbeitungsfähigkeiten und auditiven Gedächtnisleistungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Gutzmann, Daniel & Katharina Turgay. 2011. Funktionale Kategorien in der PP und deren Zweitspracherwerb. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30(2). 169–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, Pamela A., Matthew Rispoli, Janet K. Holt, Theodora Papastratakos, Ning Hsu, Mary Kubalanza & Megan M. McKenna. 2017. Input subject diversity enhances early grammatical growth: Evidence from a parent-implemented intervention. Language Learning and Development 13. 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1193020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 1988. Die Struktur der deutschen Nominalphrase. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7. 32–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Erin. 2020. Child participation in linguistic changes in progress in Ontario English. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Dietrich. 1978. Über Verschmelzungen von Präposition und bestimmtem Artikel. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Form und Funktion in gesprochenen und geschriebenen Varietäten des heutigen Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 47. Jahrgang, Heft 2 (1980), 160–183. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hinrichs, Lars & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11. 437–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson-Kam, Carla L. & Elissa L. Newport. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language variation and change. Language Learning and Development 1. 151–195.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz, Celia. 2011. Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French. Lingua 121(3). 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, Bridget L. & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2014. On the genitive’s trail: Data and method from a sociolinguistic perspective. English Language and Linguistics 18. 305–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2018. Changing minds changing tools: From learning theory to language acquisition to language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katsos, Napoleon & Dorothy V. M. Bishop. 2011. Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition 20. 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, Nikola. 2010. Possessive constructions in English child language: S- genitive and of-genitive. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart master’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Cornelia. 2000. Anmerkungen zum pränominalen Genitiv im Deutschen. In Josef Bayer & C. Römer (eds.), Von der Philologie zur Grammatiktheorie. Peter Suchsland zum 65. Geburtstag, 79–95. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Lanouette, Ruth Lunt. 1996. The atributive genitive in the history of German. In Rosina L. Lippi-Green & Joseph C. Salmons (ed.), Germanic linguistics: Syntactic and diachronic, 85–102. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz (Vol. 3; H. Seiler, ed.). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Daoxi, Lidia Grohe, Petra Schulz & Charles Yang. 2020. The distributional learning of recursive structures. In Danielle Dion & Lee-Anne Vidal Covas (eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 45], 471–485. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, Jeffrey & Annie Gagliardi. 2015. How nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowles, Alex. 2016. “The bird on the crocodile in the water”: On the acquisition of double nominal modification in German. Frankfurt: Goethe University Frankfurt bachelor’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed., vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu & Harald Clahsen. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57(4). 1–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinis, Theo. 2016. Acquiring possessives. In Jeffrey Lidz, William Snyder & Joe Pater (eds.), Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics, 435–459. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meibauer, Jörg. 2002. Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Nadig, Aparna S. & Julie C. Sedivy. 2002. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13. 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00460.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa. Forthcoming. A child’s view of Romance modification. In Gabriela Alboiu & Ruth King (eds.), Points of convergence in Romance linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Anny P. Castilla-Earls, Susana Bejar & Diane Massam. 2012. Elmo’s sister’s ball: The development of nominal recursion in children. Language Acquisition 19. 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2012.685019
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Bejar, Diane Massam & Tyler Peterson. 2018a. Strong continuity and children’s development of NP recursion. In Marcus Maia, Luiz Amaral & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Recursion in Brazilian languages and beyond, 296–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Anny P. Castilla-Earls & Jerry Brunner. 2012. General and specific effects of lexicon in grammar: Determiner and object pronoun omissions in child Spanish. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 55. 313–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Tyler Peterson, Susana Bejar, Anny P. Castilla-Earls, Diane Massam & Yves Roberge. 2018b. The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs. Language 94. 332–359.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa & Yves Roberge. 2018. A way into recursion. UMOP 41: Thoughts on mind and grammar (T.O.M. and grammar): A Festschrift in honor of Tom Roeper. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Yves Roberge, Manami Hirayama, Midori Hayashi & Kazuya Bamba. Forthcoming. On the L1 acquisition of recursive no in Japanese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Stanley & Dag Westerstahl. 2013. The semantics of possessives. Language 89(4). 713–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Radulescu, Silvia, Frank Wijnen & Sergey Avrutin. 2019. Patterns bit by bit: An entropy model for rule induction. Language Learning and Development 16. 109–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauth, Philipp. 2014. Die Entstehung von s-Plural und Sächsischem Genitive Familien- und Personennamen als Brückenkonstruktionen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 136(3). 341–373.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, Luigi. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30(2). 339–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2018-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge, Yves, Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux & Anna Frolova. 2018. On recursive modification in child L1 French. Languages 3(1). 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3010006
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, Thomas. 2007. The prism of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, Thomas. 2011. The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics 5. 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, Thomas & William Snyder. 2004. Recursion as an analytic device in acquisition. In Jacqueline van Kampen & Sergio Baauw (eds.), Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2003, 401–408. Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbach, Anette. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 81(3). 613–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfelici, Emanuela, Caroline Fery & Petra Schulz. 2020. What verb-final and V2 have in common: Evidence from the prosody of German restrictive relative clauses in adults and children. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39. 201–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2020-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfelici, Emanuela, Corinna Trabandt & Petra Schulz. 2020. The role of variation of verb placement in the input: Evidence from the acquisition of V2 and verb-final German relative clauses. In Theresa Biberauer, Sam Wolfe & Rebecca Woods (eds.), Rethinking verb second, 790–809. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherger, Anna-Lena. 2015. Schnittstelle zwischen Mehrsprachigkeit und Sprachentwicklungsstörung Kasuserwerb deutsch-italienischer Kinder mit spezifischer Sprachentwicklungsstörung. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovaç.
   Google Scholar
• Schmöe, Friederike. 2004. Fahr zur Hölle! Über Verschmelzungen aus Präposition und bestimmtem Artikel und ihre Grammatikalisiertheit. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 105. 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, Kathryn D., Charles Yang & Elissa L. Newport. 2016. Testing the Tolerance Principle: Children form productive rules when it is more computationally efficient to do so. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman & J. C. Trueswell (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2321–2326. Mahwah, NJ: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Petra. 2015. Comprehensions of exhaustive wh-questions. In Sharon Armon-Lotem, Jan de Jong & Natalia Meir (eds.), Methods for assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment, 76–94. Bristol/Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Petra & Thomas Roeper. 2011. Acquisition of exhaustivity in wh-questions: A semantic dimension of SLI? Lingua 121(3). 383–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabandt, Corinna. 2017. On the acquisition of restrictive and appositive relative clauses. Frankfurt: University of Frankfurt dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, Rosemarie. 1984. Fallstudien: Überlegungen zum Erwerb von Kasuskategorie und Kasusmarkierung. In Hartmut Czepluch & Hero Janssen (eds.), Syntaktsiche Struktur und Kasusrelationen, 271–313. Tübingen: Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Trotzke, Andreas & Jan-Wouter Zwart. 2014. The complexity of narrow syntax: Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest merge. In Frederick J. Newmeyer (ed.), Measuring grammatical complexity, 128–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turgay, Katharina. 2011. Der Zweitspracherwerb des deutschen Kasus in der Präpositionalphrase. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 39. 24–54.
   Google Scholar
• Uriagereka, Juan. 2002. Derivations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, Rineke. 2009. Logic and social cognition: The facts matter, and so do computational models. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38. 649–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-009-9115-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, Elisabeth & Nico Lehmann. 2018. Self-embedding and complexity in oral registers. Glossa 3(1). 93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weicker, Merle. 2019. The role of semantic complexity for the acquisition of adjectives. Frankfurt: Goethe Universität Frankfurt dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß, Helmut. 2008. The possessor that appears twice? Variation, structure and function of possessive doubling in German. In Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds.), Microvariation in syntactic doubling, 381–401. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, Zarah & Detmar Meurers. 2019. Analyzing linguistic complexity and accuracy in academic language development of German across elementary and secondary school. In Helen Yannakoudakis, Ekaterina Kochmar, Claudia Leacock, Nitin Madnani, Ildikó Pilán & Torsten Zesch (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 380–393. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, Manuel, Sandra Auderset, Johanna Nichols, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel. 2017. NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language 93. 799–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2016. The price of productivity. How children learn to break the rules of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar