QUD sensitivity in the computation of scalar implicatures in second language acquisition

References

• Bott, Lewis & Ira Noveck. 2004. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3). 437–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouton, Lawrence. 1992. The interpretation of implicature in English by NNS: Does it come automatically—without being explicitly taught? Pragmatics and Language Learning 3. 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, Marc & Michael Stevens. 2018. Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition 1(1). 9. doi:https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chi, Weidong. 2000. Towards a logical differentiation between “part” and “some.” Shandong Normal University Journal (Social Science) 169. 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 39–103. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain-widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4). 535–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27(1). 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2018. Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40(3). 693–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degen, Judith & Michael Tanenhaus. 2015. Processing scalar implicature: A constraint-based approach. Cognitive Science 39. 667–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, Wim & Walter Schaeken. 2007. When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology 54(2). 128–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupuy, Lidivine, Penka Stateva, Sara Andreetta, Anne Cheylus, Viviane Déprez, Jean-Baptiste van der Henst, Jacques Jayez, Arthur Stepanov & Anne Reboul. 2019. Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(2). 314–340.
   Google Scholar
• Felser, Claudia, Leah Roberts, Theodore Marinis & Rebecca Gross. 2003. The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics 24(3). 453–489.
   Google Scholar
• Foucart, Alice, Xavier Garcia, Meritxell Ayguasanosa, Guillaume Thierry, Clara Martin & Albert Costa. 2015. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia 75. 291–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopp, Holger. 2010. Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua 120(4). 901–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Ajun & Stephen Crain. 2013. Acquisition of the polarity sensitive item renhe “any” in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 41(4). 861–889.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang, Yan. 2016. Scalar implicature. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, 1–7. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per Brockhoff & Rune Christensen. 2018. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marty, Paul P. & Emmanuel Chemla. 2013. Scalar implicatures: Working memory and a comparison with only. Frontiers in Psychology 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00403
   Google Scholar
• Mazzaggio, Greta, Daniele Panizza & Luca Surian. 2021. On the interpretation of scalar implicatures in first and second language. Journal of Pragmatics 171. 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber. 2012. The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of “scalar inferences.” In Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber (eds.), Meaning and relevance, 307–330. Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.018
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Hui-Yu, Sarah Schimke & Claudia Felser. 2015. Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism 19. 298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, Despina & Harald Clahsen. 2003. Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24. 501–528.
   Google Scholar
• Politzer-Ahles, Stephen & Robert Fiorentino. 2013. The realization of scalar inferences: Context sensitivity without processing cost. PLoS ONE 8(5). E63943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politzer-Ahles, Stephen & E. Matthew Husband. 2018. Eye movement evidence for context-sensitive derivation of scalar inferences. Collabra: Psychology 4(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qualtrics. 2020. Qualtrics software, Version 12-2019 and 01-2020. https://www.qualtrics.com
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure: Towards an integrated theory of formal pragmatics. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49. 91–36.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Craige. 2012. Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantic and Pragmatics 5. 1–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Leah & Claudia Felser. 2011. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 32(2). 299–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronai, Eszter & Ming Xiang. 2020. Pragmatic inferences are QUD-sensitive: An experimental study. Journal of Linguistics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000389
   Google Scholar
• Slabakova, Roumyana. 2010. Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 120(10). 2444–2462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape, Neal & Hironobu Hosoi. 2018. Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(2). 163–192.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, Michael. 2001. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4. 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yu-Fang Flora & Miao-Ling Hsieh. 1996. A syntactic study of the Chinese negative polarity item renhe. Cahiers de Linguistique—Asie Orientale 25(1). 35–62.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, Jeffrey, Naoko Witzel & Janet Nicol. 2012. Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 33(2). 419–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000427
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Zhuang & Juan Tan. 2009. Scalar implicature in Chinese child language: An experimental study. Journal of Foreign Languages 32(3). 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Xiao, Utako Minai & Robert Fiorentino. 2018. Context-sensitivity and individual differences in the derivation of scalar implicature. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 1720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar