Advanced search
Publication Cover
Language Acquisition Volume 30, 2023 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
599
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Event-related potentials in the study of L2 sentence processing: A scoping review of the decade 2010-2020

Giada Antonicellia University of Pavia;b Basque Center on Cognition Brain and LanguageCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-7612
ORCID Icon &
Stefano Rastellia University of PaviaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3052-1312
ORCID Icon
Pages 163-200 | Received 28 Nov 2021, Accepted 09 Oct 2022, Published online: 01 Dec 2022

References Reviewed papers77 Starred (*) papers are part of the qualitative review but are excluded from the distributional and statistical analyses.

  • Alemán Bañón, J., R. Fiorentino, & A. Gabriele. 2014. Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance. Second Language Research, 30(3). 275–306.
  • Alemán Bañón, J., R. Fiorentino, & A. Gabriele. 2018. Using event-related potentials to track morphosyntactic development in second language learners: The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish. PloS one, 13(7). e0200791.
  • Alemán Bañón, J., D. Miller, & J. Rothman. 2017. Morphological variability in second language learners: An examination of electrophysiological and production data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10). 1509.
  • Andersson, A., S. Sayehli, & M. Gullberg. 2019. Language background affects online word order processing in a second language but not offline. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4). 802–825.
  • Batterink, L. & H. Neville. 2013. Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6). 936–951.
  • Berthelsen, S.G., M. Horne, K.J. Brännström, Y. Shtyrov, & M. Roll. 2018. Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 45. 60–78.
  • Bowden, H.W., K. Steinhauer, C. Sanz, & M.T. Ullman. 2013. Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13). 2492–2511.
  • Carrasco-Ortíz, H. & C. Frenck-Mestre. 2014. Phonological and orthographic cues enhance the processing of inflectional morphology. ERP evidence from L1 and L2 French. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. 888.
  • Carrasco-Ortíz, H., A.V. Herrera, D. Jackson-Maldonado, G.N.A. Ramírez, J.S. Pereyra, & N.Y. Wicha. 2017. The role of language similarity in processing second language morphosyntax: Evidence from ERPs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 117. 91–110.
  • Chang, X. & P. Wang. 2016. Influence of second language proficiency and syntactic structure similarities on the sensitivity and processing of English passive sentence in late Chinese-English bilinguists: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(1). 85–101.
  • Citron, F.M., R. Oberecker, A.D. Friederici, & J.L. Mueller. 2011. Mass counts: ERP correlates of non-adjacent dependency learning under different exposure conditions. Neuroscience Letters, 487(3). 282–286.
  • Dallas, A., G. DeDe, & J. Nicol. 2013. An event-related potential (ERP) investigation of filler-gap processing in native and second language speakers. Language Learning, 63(4). 766–799.
  • Dekydtspotter, L., C. Gilbert, K. Miller, M. Iverson, T. Leal, & I. Innis. 2017. ERP Correlates of Cyclic Computations: Anaphora in Native and L2 French. In Maria LaMendola & Jennifer Scott (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, November 4-6, 2016, 208–221. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Deng, T. & B. Chen. 2019. Input training matters in L2 syntactic representation entrenchment: Evidence from a follow-up ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(3). 729–745.
  • Deng, T., J. Shi, S. Dunlap, H. Bi, & B. Chen. 2016. Morphological knowledge affects processing of L2 derivational morphology: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 37. 47–57.
  • Deng, T., H. Zhou, H.Y. Bi, & B. Chen. 2015. Input-based structure-specific proficiency predicts the neural mechanism of adult L2 syntactic processing. Brain Research, 1610. 42–50.
  • Díaz, B., K. Erdocia, R.F. De Menezes, J.L. Mueller, N. Sebastián-Gallés, & I. Laka 2016. Electrophysiological correlates of second-language syntactic processes are related to native and second language distance regardless of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. 133.
  • Dowens, M.G., M. Vergara, H.A. Barber, & M. Carreiras. 2010. Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8). 1870–1887.
  • Dussias, P.E., C. Contemori, & P. Román. 2014. Processing ser and estar to locate objects and events: An ERP study with L2 speakers of Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1). 54–86.
  • Elgort, I., C.A. Perfetti, B. Rickles, & J.Z. Stafura. 2015. Contextual learning of L2 word meanings: Second language proficiency modulates behavioural and event-related brain potential (ERP) indicators of learning. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(5). 506–528.
  • Esfandiari, L., R. Nilipour, V. Nejati, P. Maftoon, & R. Khosrowabad. 2020. An event-related potential study of second language semantic and syntactic processing: Evidence from the declarative/procedural model. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 11(6). 841.
  • Faretta-Stutenberg, M. & K. Morgan-Short. 2018. The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development. Second Language Research, 34(1). 67–101.
  • Foucart, A. & C. Frenck-Mestre. 2011. Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 379–399.
  • Foucart, A. & C. Frenck-Mestre. 2012. Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1). 226–248.
  • Foucart, A., X. Garcia, M. Ayguasanosa, G. Thierry, C. Martin, & A. Costa. 2015b. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 75. 291–303.
  • Foucart, A., C.D. Martin, E.M. Moreno, & A. Costa. 2014. Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5). 1461.
  • Foucart, A., E. Moreno, C.D. Martin, & A. Costa. 2015a. Integration of moral values during L2 sentence processing. Acta Psychologica, 162. 1–12.
  • Foucart, A., C. Romero-Rivas, B.L. Gort, & A. Costa. 2016. Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said. Brain and Language, 163, 32–41.
  • Fromont, L.A., P. Royle, & K. Steinhauer. 2020. Growing Random Forests reveals that exposure and proficiency best account for individual variability in L2 (and L1) brain potentials for syntax and semantics. Brain and Language, 204. 104770.
  • Gabriele, A., R. Fiorentino, & J.A. Bañón. 2013. Examining second language development using event-related potentials: A cross-sectional study on the processing of gender and number agreement. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2). 213–232.
  • Grey, S., C. Sanz, K. Morgan-Short, & M.T. Ullman. 2018. Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5). 970–994.
  • Grey, S., L.C. Schubel, J.M. McQueen, & J.G. Van Hell. 2019. Processing foreign-accented speech in a second language: Evidence from ERPs during sentence comprehension in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5). 912–929.
  • Hed, A., A. Schremm, M. Horne, & M. Roll. 2019. Neural correlates of second language acquisition of tone-grammar associations. The Mental Lexicon, 14(1). 98–123.
  • Ito, A., A.E. Martin, & M.S. Nieuwland. 2017. On predicting form and meaning in a second language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4). 635.
  • Jessen, A. & C. Felser. 2019. Reanalysing object gaps during nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs. Second Language Research, 35(2). 285–300.
  • Jessen, A., J. Festman, O. Boxell, & C. Felser. 2017. Native and nonnative speakers’ brain responses to filled indirect object gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(5). 1319–1338.
  • Kaan, E., J. Kirkham, & F. Wijnen. 2016. Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1). 1–18.
  • Lemhöfer, K., H. Schriefers, & P. Indefrey. 2014. Idiosyncratic grammars: Syntactic processing in second language comprehension uses subjective feature representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(7). 1428–1444.
  • Lemhöfer, K., H. Schriefers, & P. Indefrey. 2020. Syntactic processing in L2 depends on perceived reliability of the input: Evidence from P600 responses to correct input. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10). 1948.
  • Liang, L., Y. Wen, & Y. Dong. 2018. Gender constraint in L1 and L2 reflexive pronoun resolution by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 45. 1–12.
  • Martin, C.D., G. Thierry, J.R. Kuipers, B. Boutonnet, A. Foucart, & A. Costa. 2013. Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4). 574–588.
  • *Meulman, N., M. Wieling, S.A. Sprenger, L.A. Stowe, & M.S. Schmid. 2015. Age effects in L2 grammar processing as revealed by ERPs and how (not) to study them. PloS one, 10(12). e0143328.
  • Mickan, A. & K. Lemhöfer. 2020. Tracking syntactic conflict between languages over the course of L2 acquisition: A cross-sectional event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(5). 822–846.
  • Morgan-Short, K., I. Finger, S. Grey, & M.T. Ullman. 2012a. Second language processing shows increased native-like neural responses after months of no exposure. PLoS One, 7(3). e32974.
  • Morgan-Short, K., C. Sanz, K. Steinhauer, & M.T. Ullman. 2010. Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1). 154–193.
  • Morgan-Short, K., K. Steinhauer, C. Sanz, & M.T. Ullman. 2012b. Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4). 933–947.
  • *Nichols, E.S. & M.F. Joanisse. 2019. Individual differences predict ERP signatures of second language learning of novel grammatical rules. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(1). 78–92.
  • Nickels, S., B. Opitz, & K. Steinhauer. 2013. ERPs show that classroom-instructed late second language learners rely on the same prosodic cues in syntactic parsing as native speakers. Neuroscience Letters, 557. 107–111.
  • Nickels, S. & K. Steinhauer. 2018. Prosody–syntax integration in a second language: Contrasting event-related potentials from German and Chinese learners of English using linear mixed effect models. Second Language Research, 34(1). 9–37.
  • Paulmann, S., Z. Ghareeb-Ali, & C. Felser. 2015. Neurophysiological markers of phrasal verb processing: Evidence from L1 and L2 speakers. In R. Heredia & A. Cieślicka (eds.), Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, 245–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Qi, Z., S.D. Beach, A.S. Finn, J. Minas, C. Goetz, B. Chan, & J.D. Gabrieli. 2017. Native-language N400 and P600 predict dissociable language-learning abilities in adults. Neuropsychologia, 98. 177–191.
  • Reichle, R.V., & D. Birdsong. 2014. Processing focus structure in L1 and L2 French: L2 proficiency effects on ERPs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3). 535–564.
  • Romero-Rivas, C., J.D. Corey, X. Garcia, G. Thierry, C.D. Martin, & A. Costa. 2017. World knowledge and novel information integration during L2 speech comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(3). 576–587.
  • Rossi, E., J.F. Kroll, & P.E. Dussias. 2014. Clitic pronouns reveal the time course of processing gender and number in a second language. Neuropsychologia, 62. 11–25.
  • Son, G. 2020. Morpheme analysis associated with german noun plural endings among second language (L2) learners using event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain Sciences, 10(11). 866.
  • *Tanner, D., K. Inoue, & L. Osterhout. 2014. Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2). 277–293.
  • Tanner, D., J. McLaughlin, J. Herschensohn, & L. Osterhout. 2013. Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2). 367–382.
  • Wang, Q. (2018). Neural Mechanism and Representation of English and Chinese Metaphors of Bilinguals with Different Second Language Proficiency: An ERP Study. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(1), 67–83.
  • White, E.J., F. Genesee, & K. Steinhauer. 2012. Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: Proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners. PloS one, 7(12). e52318.
  • Xue, J., F. Marmolejo-Ramos, & X. Pei. 2015. The linguistic context effects on the processing of body–object interaction words: An ERP study on second language learners. Brain Research, 1613. 37–48.
  • Xue, J., J. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Qi, C. Bai, & Y. Qiu. 2013. An ERP study on Chinese natives’ second language syntactic grammaticalization. Neuroscience Letters, 534. 258–263.
  • Xue, J., J. Yang, & Q. Zhao. 2014. Chinese–English bilinguals processing temporal–spatial metaphor. Cognitive processing, 15(3). 269–281.
  • Xu, X., M. Pan, H. Dai, H. Zhang, & Y. Lu. 2019. How referential uncertainty is modulated by conjunctions: ERP evidence from advanced Chinese–English L2 learners and English L1 speakers. Second Language Research, 35(2). 195–224.
  • Zheng, X. & K. Lemhöfer. 2019. The “semantic P600” in second language processing: When syntax conflicts with semantics. Neuropsychologia, 127. 131–147.

Reference works

  • Agresti, A. 2015. Foundations of linear and generalized linear models. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. 2012. ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012 [ Electronic version].
  • Aronoff, M. 2013. The roots of language. In S. Cruschina, M. Maiden & J.C. Smith (eds.), The boundaries of pure morphology. Diachronic and Synchronic perspectives, 161–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Baayen, R.H. 2012. Mixed-effects models. In A.C. Cohn, C. Fougeron & M.K. Huffman (eds.), Handbook of Laboratory Phonology, 668–677. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Baayen, R.H., D.J. Davidson, & D.M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4). 390–412.
  • Baddeley, A.D. 1983. Working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 302(1110). 311–324.
  • Baddeley, A. 2010. Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4). R136–R140.
  • Baggio, G. 2018. Meaning in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Baggio, G. 2021. Compositionality in a parallel architecture for language processing. Cognitive Science, 45(5). e12949.
  • Beres, A.M. 2017. Time is of the essence: A review of electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in language research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 42(4). 247–255.
  • Bley-Vroman, R. 1988. The fundamental character of foreign language learning. Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings, 19–30. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bley-Vroman, R. 1989. What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S.M. Gass and J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, 41–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bley-Vroman, R. 2009. The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2).175198.).175198.
  • Brouwer, H. & M.W. Crocker. 2017. On the proper treatment of the N400 and P600 in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 1327.
  • Brouwer, H., H. Fitz, & J. Hoeks. 2012. Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446. 127–143.
  • Caffarra, S., M. Mendoza, & D. Davidson. 2019. Is the LAN effect in morphosyntactic processing an ERP artifact? Brain and Language, 191. 9–16.
  • Caffarra, S., N. Molinaro, D. Davidson, & M. Carreiras. 2015. Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51. 31–47.
  • Carnie, A. 2021. Syntax: A generative introduction. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Clahsen, H. & C. Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1). 3.
  • Clahsen, H. & C. Felser. 2018. Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3). 693–706.
  • Conway, A.R., M.J. Kane, M.F. Bunting, D.Z. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm, & R.W. Engle. 2005. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5). 769–786.
  • Council of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Culicover, P.W. & R. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Culicover, P.W. & R. Jackendoff. 2006a. Turn over control to the semantics! Syntax, 9(2). 131–152.
  • Culicover, P.W. & R. Jackendoff. 2006b. The simpler syntax hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(9). 413–418.
  • Dörnyei, Z. & R. Schmidt (eds.). 2001. Motivation and second language acquisition, vol. 23. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa.
  • Dunn, L.M. 1959. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Dunn, D.M. 2019. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
  • Fernandez, C.B., K.A. Litcofsky, & J.G. Van Hell. 2019. Neural correlates of intra-sentential code-switching in the auditory modality. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51. 17–41.
  • Friederici, A.D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2). 78–84.
  • Friederici, A.D. 2004. Event-related brain potential studies in language. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 4(6). 466–470.
  • Gaillard, S. & A. Tremblay. 2016. Linguistic proficiency assessment in second language acquisition research: The elicited imitation task. Language Learning, 66(2). 419–447.
  • Gardner, R.C. 2010. Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model, vol. 10. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Grey, S. 2020. What can artificial languages reveal about morphosyntactic processing in bilinguals? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1). 81–86.
  • Hahne, A. & A.D. Friederici. 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2). 194–205.
  • Hawkins, R. & C.Y.H. Chan. 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis.” Second Language Research, 13(3). 187–226.
  • Kaan, E. 2016. Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different?. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2). 257–282.
  • Kappenman, E.S., & S.J. Luck. 2011. The ups and downs of brainwave recordings. In S.J. Luck and Kappenman, E. S. (eds.). (2011), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kaushanskaya, M., H.K. Blumenfeld, & V. Marian. 2019. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Ten years later. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–6.
  • Koeneman, O. & H. Zeijlstra. 2017. Introducing syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krashen, S. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Lardiere, D. 1998a. Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady state. Second Language Research, 14. 1–26 .
  • Lardiere, D. 1998b. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359–375.
  • Leckey, M., & K.D. Federmeier. 2019. Electrophysiological methods in the study of language processing. In G.I. De Zubicaray & N.O. Schiller (eds.). The Oxford handbook of neurolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lehmann, C. 2007. Linguistic competence: Theory and empiry. Folia Linguistica, 41(3–4). 223–278.
  • Lemhöfer, K. & M. Broersma. 2012. Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2). 325–343.
  • Lenneberg, E.H. 1967. The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12). 59–67.
  • Lightbown, P. 1983. Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H.W. Seliger and M. Long (eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition, 217–245. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Luque, A. & K. Morgan-Short. 2021. The relationship between cognitive control and second language proficiency. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 57. 100956.
  • MacWhinney, B. 2005. A unified model of language acquisition. In J.F. Kroll and A.M.B. deGroot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 49–67. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ma, W. & P. Winke. 2019. Self‐assessment: How reliable is it in assessing oral proficiency over time? Foreign Language Annals, 52(1). 66–86.
  • McLaughlin, J., L. Osterhout, & A. Kim. 2004. Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7(7). 703–704.
  • McLaughlin, J., D. Tanner, I. Pitkänen, C. Frenck‐Mestre, K. Inoue, G. Valentine, & L. Osterhout. 2010. Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60. 123–150.
  • Meara, P. 2010. EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
  • Milton, J. 2013. Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist, & B. Laufer (eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis. EUROSLA-the European Second Language Association., 2. 57–78.
  • Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, & PRISMA Group. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4). 264–269.
  • Moreno, E.M., A. Rodríguez-Fornells, & M. Laine. 2008. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in the study of bilingual language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6). 477–508.
  • Morgan-Short, K. 2014. Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34. 15–36.
  • Morgan-Short, K. 2020. Insights into the neural mechanisms of becoming bilingual: A brief synthesis of second language research with artificial linguistic systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1). 87–91.
  • Munn, Z., M.D. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, & E. Aromataris. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1). 1–7.
  • Oscarson, M. 1989. Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6(1). 1–13.
  • Osterhout, L., A. Poliakov, K. Inoue, J. McLaughlin, G. Valentine, I. Pitkanen, Frenck-Mestre, C., & Hirschensohn, J. 2008. Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6). 509–521.
  • Paradis, M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism, vol. 18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Paradis, M. 2009. Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages, vol. 40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Plonsky, L. 2013. Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35. 655–687.
  • Plonsky, L. & H. Ghanbar. 2018. Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. The Modern Language Journal, 102(4). 713–731.
  • Plonsky, L. & F.L. Oswald. 2017. Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3). 579–592.
  • Prévost, P. & L. White 2000. Missing surface infl ection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16. 103–133 .
  • Raatz, U. & C. Klein-Braley. 1981. The C-Test—A modification of the Cloze Procedure. In T. Culhane, C. Klein-Braley, & D.K. Stevenson (eds.), Practice and problems in language testing, University of Essex Occasional Papers, 113–148. Colchester: University of Essex.
  • Rastelli, S. 2018. Neurolinguistics and second language teaching: A view from the crossroads. Second Language Research, 34(1). 103–123.
  • R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Reichle, R.V., A. Tremblay, & C. Coughlin. 2016. Working memory capacity in L2 processing. Probus, 28(1). 29–55.
  • Schwartz, B.D. & R.A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1). 40–72.
  • Slabakova, R. 2006. Is there a critical period for the acquisition of semantics? Second Language Research, 22(3). 302–338.
  • Slabakova, R. 2019. The bottleneck hypothesis updated. In Tania Ionin & Matthew Rispoli (eds.), Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected Papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 319–345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1). 1–33.
  • Sorace, A. & F. Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3). 339–368.
  • Steinhauer, K. 2014. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35(4). 393–417.
  • Steinhauer, K. & J.E. Drury. 2012. On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain and Language, 120(2). 135–162.
  • Steinhauer, K., E.J. White, & J.E. Drury. 2009. Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1). 13–41.
  • Swaab, T.Y., K. Ledoux, C.C. Camblin, & M.A. Boudewyn. 2011. Language-related ERP components. In S.J. Luck and E.S. Kappenman (eds.). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tanner, D. & J.G. Van Hell. 2014. ERPs Reveal Individual Differences in Morphosyntactic Processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289–301.
  • Ullman, M.T. 2001. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2). 105–122.
  • Ullman, M.T. 2016. The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In G. Hickok and S. Small (eds.), Neurobiology of Language, 953–968. London: Academic Press, Elsevier.
  • Van Hell, J.G., & N. Tokowicz. 2010. Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26(1). 43–74.
  • Van Patten, B., G.D. Keating, & M.J. Leeser. 2012. Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem: Evidence from self-paced reading. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(2). 109–140.
  • Van Petten, C. & B.J. Luka. 2012. Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2). 176–190.
  • Weber-Fox, C.M. & H.J. Neville. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3). 231–256.
  • Wen, Z., M.B. Mota, & A. McNeill (eds.). 2015. Working memory in second language acquisition and processing, vol. 87. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Wood, S.N. 2017. Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. New York: CRC Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.