Not all English Resultative Constructions (ERCs) are equal: The acquisition of ERC by Spanish speakers

References

• Agresti, Alan. 2002. Categorical data analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, Artemis. 2020. Compound formation in language mixing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 1021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, Rosa. 2015. Boundary-crossing events in Spanish learners of English: A study on motion INTO events. In Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano & Alberto Hijazo-Gascón (eds.), New horizons in the study of motion: Bringing together applied and theoretical perspectives, 64–79. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v15i0.1753
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, Salvador; Yazmin Pérez-Nares, Zenaida Rodriguez, Santa del Carmen Herrera & Marla Pérez-Barriga. 2016. Change of state predicates: The acquisition of the English resultative constructions by Spanish speakers. Proceedings Officer 2016 Conference, 14th-16th November 2016, Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, Hans. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Broccias, Cristiano. 2004. Adjective selection in resultative constructions. In C. Torsello, M. Grazia Busà & S. Gesuato (eds.), Lingua Inglese e mediazione interlinguistica, 241–260. Padova: Unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cadierno, Teresa. 2012. Language and bilingual cognition. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(1). 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.594674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadierno, Teresa & Lucas Ruiz. 2006. Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1). 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad
   Google Scholar
• Chiswick, Barry & Paul Miller. 2005. Linguistic distance: A quantitative measure of the Distance between English and other Languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26 (1). 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen. 2019. Ordinal—Regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2019.12-10.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Mark. 2015. Corpus of contemporary American English (COCA) [Harvard Dataverse, V2]. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
   Google Scholar
• De Clercq, Bastien & Alex Housen. 2017. A cross-linguistic perspective on syntactic complexity in L2 development: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2). 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Swart, Henriëtte. 2011. Mismatches and coercion. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 574–597. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick & Laura Collins. 2009. Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93. 329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fábregas, Antonio. 2010. A cartographic analysis of Spanish prepositional affixes. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9. 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Adele & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English Resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80(3). 532–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, Arturo, Eva Fernández & Noemí Aznar-Besé. 2007. Bilingual language processing. In M. Gareth Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 371–384. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74 (2–3). 101–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housen, Alex & Hannelore Simoens. 2016. Introduction: Cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38. 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, Jan Hendrik & Rick de Graaff. 1994. Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11. 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ionin, Tania & Eve Zyzik. 2014. Judgment and interpretation tasks in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34. 37–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kailuweit, Rolf, Lisann Künkel and Eva Staudinger (eds.). 2018. Applying and expanding role and reference grammar, 305–325. Freiburg, Germany: NIHIN.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Sujeong, Heejeong Ko & Hyun-Kwon Yang. 2019. Telicity and mode of merge in L2 acquisition of resultatives. Language Acquisition, 27(2). 117–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2019.1659275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzywinski, Martin & Naomi Altman. 2013. Error bars. Nature Methods, 10(10), 921–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2019. Syntactic complexity across proficiency and languages: L2 and L1 writing in Dutch, Italian and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29(2). 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrañaga, Pilar, Jeanine Treffers-Daller, Françoise Tidball & Mari-carmen Gil Ortega. 2012. L1 transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1). 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911405577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, Kristin & Mirjam Broersma 2012. Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2). 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzing, Anke. 2013. The development of the grammatical system in early second language acquisition: the multiple constraints hypothesis. 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Ping, Fan Zhang, Erlfang Tsai & Brendan Puls. 2013. Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17. 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2005. A unified model of language acquisition. In J. Kroll and A. M. B. Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 49–67. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian & Elizabeth Bates (eds.). 1989. The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 3–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, Shinichi, Paul Johnson & Holger Schielzeth. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14. 20170213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, Donna Jo. 1992. Secondary resultative predicates in Italian. Journal of Linguistics, 28. 53–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, Cândido. 2016. Processing, representation and learnability of the resultative construction by Brazilian Portuguese-English bilinguals [PhD Thesis]. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25160.72968/1
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, Cândido & Alberto Penzin 2019. The negative evidence hypothesis: The acquisition of the double-object construction by Brazilian-Portuguese English bilinguals. Ilha Do Desterro. A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 72(3). 331–358. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2019v72n3p331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4). 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palotti, Gabriele. 2015. A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research, 31 (1). 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• París, Luis. 2006. Implicating and focusing on underspecified lexical information. In K. von Heusinger and K. Turner (eds.), When semantics meets pragmatics, 421–444. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• París, Luis. 2008. On expanditures. In N. Adams, A. Cooper, F. Parrill, and T. Wier (eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Conference, 291–304. Cape Town, South Africa: CLS.
   Google Scholar
• París, Luis. 2012. Breve descripción de la construcción causativa [A Brief Description of the Causative Construction]. In P. Mairal, L. Guerrero, and C. González Vergara (eds.), Avances en la Gramática del Rol y la Referencia, 287–305. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Akal.
   Google Scholar
• París, Luis. 2019. La construcción resultativa del inglés en contraste [The English Resultative Construction in Contrast]. Onomázein Revista de lingüística filología y traducción, 46. 259–286. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.46.13
   Google Scholar
• Pienemann, Manfred. 1998. Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam Michael, Matthew Carlson & David Reitter. 2017. Integrated, not isolated: Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 2212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, Tova. 2019. Secondary predication. In R. Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 426–456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English Resultatives. Language, 77(4). 766–797. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2019. Lexicalization patterns. In R. Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 395–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla, Robert. 1968. Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66. 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringbom, Håkan. 2006. Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. In Cross-Linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning, 144. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599361
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli, Matthew. 1991. The mosaic acquisition of grammatical relations. Journal of Child Language, 18. 517–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900011235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Peter, Teresa Cadierno & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2009. Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4). 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütze, Carson. 2019. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology (Classics in Linguistics 2). Berlin: Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, Carson & Jon Sprouse. 2014. Judgment data. In D. Sharma & R. Podesva (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Enchao. 2016. Secondary predicates in native and nonnative grammars. Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 30), October 28th -30th, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant Pardeshi. 2002. The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, vol. 48, 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.07shi
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan. 1996. From «thought and language» to «thinking for speaking» In J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, 70–96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan. 2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), Current issues in linguistic theory, vol. 198, 107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.198.10slo
   Google Scholar
• Spada, Nina & Yasuyo Tomita. 2010. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2). 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Min-Chang & Hyunwoo Kim. 2022. Effects of verb–construction association on second language constructional generalizations in production and comprehension. Second Language Research, 38(2). 233–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1-vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ursini, Francesco. 2013. On the syntax and semantic of Spanish Prepositions. Borealis 2. 117–166.
   Google Scholar
• van Valin, Robert. 1991. Functionalist linguistic theory and language acquisition. First Language 11. 7–40.
   Google Scholar
• van Valin, Robert. 2000. The acquisition of complex sentences: A case study in the role of theory in the study of language development. In J. Boyle, J-H. Lee, and A. Okrent (eds.), CLS 36, Volume 2: The Panels, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• van Valin, Robert. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578
   Google Scholar
• van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. structure, meaning and function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Kenny. 2016. The acquisition of passive constructions in L2 English by Mandarin speakers. München, Germany: Lincom.
   Google Scholar
• Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6(1). 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, Stephen. 2005. Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 255–273. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Edwin. 1997. Lexical and syntactic complex predicates. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan & J. Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 13–28. Stanford, CT: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe-Quintero, Kate, Shunji Inagaki & Hae‑young Kim. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
   Google Scholar
• Yotsuya, Atsuko, Masanao Asano, Sayaka Koyama, Kazunori Suzuki, Mayumi Shibuya, Eri Iwagami, Kazuki Endo, Minami Ono, Kazue Takeda & Makiko Hirakawa. 2014. Crosslinguistic effects in L2 acquisition: Strong/weak resultatives and the directional/locational interpretation of PPs in L2 English by Japanese speakers. In R. Miller (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 2012 Second Language Research Forum, 89–100. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar