Tool-mediated authentic learning in an educational technology course: a designed-based innovation

References

• Amiel, T., & Reeves, T.C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amory, A. (2010). Education technology and hidden ideological contradictions. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 169–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32, 121–24. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001021
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 11–14. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S.A., Evans, M.A., & Baek, E.O. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communities and technology, 199–214.Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, P., Noble, J., & Biddle, R. (2007). Video game values: Human–computer interaction and games. Interacting with Computers, 19, 180–195. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becta (2007). Making a difference with technology for learning: Evidence for local authorities. Retrieved fromhttp://partners.becta.org.uk/uploaddir/downloads/page_documents/research/impact_July2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benson, A., Lawler, C., & Whitworth, A. (2008). Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 456–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00838.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, 475–490. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18, 132–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Browne, T., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2006). A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14, 177–192. doi: 10.1080/10494820600852795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 19 doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Instructional Technology Forum. Retrieved fromhttp://www.iit-iti.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/iit-publications-iti/docs/NRC-50758.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, W.H., Cheong, P.H., & Park, N. (2004). The social shaping of a virtual learning environment: The case of a University-wide course management system. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2, 169–80.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43, 960–974. doi: 10.1080/001401300409143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of education and work, 14, 1133–156. doi: 10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interacting with Computers, 20, 256–259. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, G., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. (2009). Assessment issues and new technologies: ePortfolio possibilities. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Ed.), Educational assessment in the 21st century, 63–81.Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, B.R., Enyedy, N.D. (1999). Activity centered design: Towards a theoretical framework for CSCL. In C.M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Ed.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference (pp. 189–196), Palo Alto, CA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, J. (2005). Activity theory as a framework for understanding teachers' perceptions of computer usage at a primary school level in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 25, 258
   Google Scholar
• Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Using technology in higher education: An activity theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 177–83. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, H.L., Lewis, M.A., & Talbot, R.M.III (2008). Building a framework for determining the authenticity of instructional tasks within teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 290–302. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D.H., & Reeves, T.C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 693–719.New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 14–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., Luckin, R., Plowman, L., & Taylor, J. (2000). Affordances for learning in a non-linear narrative medium. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, 2
   Google Scholar
• Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, personality, and consciousness, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F.M., Bryk, A.S., & Nagaoka, J.K. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence. Improving Chicago's schools, Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved fromhttp://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/p0f02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M.F. (2003). Experiences with learning management systems in 113 European institutions. Educational Technology & Society, 6, 134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures, New York: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., Baker, M., & Lund, K. (2006). GESTALT: A framework for redesign of educational software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 134 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00158.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, T.C., & Hedberg, J.G. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52, 53–65. doi: 10.1007/BF02504718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.M., & Lee, Y.J. (2007). “Vygotsky's Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232. doi: 10.3102/0034654306298273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education?. Computers & Education, 44, 343–355. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 170–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
   Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491. doi: 10.1007/s11422-008-9111-3
   Google Scholar
• The Design-Based Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 15–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (1933/1978).
   Google Scholar
• Yueh, H.P., & Hsu, S. (2008). Designing a learning management system to support instruction. Communications of the ACM, 51, 59–63. doi: 10.1145/1330311.1330324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar