Reconceptualizing design research in the age of mobile learning

References

• Andersen, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apedoe, X., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Strategies for success: Uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41(4), 773–791. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9251-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmair, B., & Pachler, N. (2014). A cultural ecological frame for mobility and learning. In D. Meister, T. Hug, & N. Friesen (Eds.), Educational media ecologies: International perspectives. Special Issue of MedienPaedagogik. Retrieved from http://www.medienpaed.com
   Google Scholar
• Bannan, B. (2009). The integrative learning design framework: An illustrated example from the domain of instructional technology. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to educational design research (pp. 53–71). Enschede: SLO Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bannan, B. (2012). Design research and twice exceptional children: Toward an integration of motivation, emotion and cognition factors for a technology-based intervention. In D. Y. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 101–128). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bannan, B. (2013). GO inquire – Geological observational inquiry: Cycles of design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research – Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 113–139). Enschede: SLO. Retrieved from http://international.slo.nl/publications/edr/
   Google Scholar
• Bannan, B., Peters, E., & Martinez, P. (2010). Mobile, inquiry-based learning and geological observation: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(3), 13–29. doi: 10.4018/jmbl.2010070102
   Google Scholar
• Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001021
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. (1998, August 27–30). Fuzzy generalization: An approach to building educational theory. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland. Retreived from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000000801.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. London: Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi: 10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Carmean, C., Franfort, J. L., & Salim, K. N. (2013). The power of the personal. In Z. L. Berge & L. Routledge Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 187–195). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T.-W. (2013). Sharing sentiments and wearing a pair of ‘field spectacles’ to view classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 514–516. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communications technologies? ALT-J, 12(2), 113–124. doi: 10.1080/0968776042000216183
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Bannan, B. (2013). Reconceptualizing design research for design seeking and scaling. A short position paper. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/johnnigelcook/design-seeking-and-scaling-v1
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Bannan, B., & Santos, P. (2013, September 21). Seeking and scaling model for designing technology that supports personal and professional learning networks. Workshop on Collaborative Technologies for Working and Learning (ECSCW meets EC-TEL), Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2006.23473212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., … Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2004). Design for learning. E-learning, 1(1), 38–93. doi: 10.2304/elea.2004.1.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115–128. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R., & Baek, J. (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Pachler, N. (2007). Thinking about the ‘m’ in m-learning. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 7–32). London: WLE Centre. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5506614/Mobile_learning_towards_a_research_agenda
   Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedeo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2011). The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Combining e-learning and m-learning: New applications of blended educational resources (pp. 151–177). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).
   Google Scholar
• Ljubojevic, D., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Theoretical approach to distillation of pedagogical patterns from practice to enable transfer and reuse of good teaching. Paper presented at the European LAMS & Learning Design Conference. Retrieved from http://lams2010.lamsfoundation.org/pdfs/04d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2005). The problem with affordance. E-learning, 2(4), 402–13. doi: 10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.402
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, cultural practices. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Evans, M., Redondo, A., & Fisher, L. (2014). Learning to teach foreign languages in the secondary school (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierroux, P. (2009). Newbies and design research: Approaches to designing a learning environment using mobile and social technologies. In G. Vavoula, N. Pachler, & A. Kukulska-Hulme (Eds.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 289–316). Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Liefer, L. (2012). Design thinking research: Studying co-creation in practice. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2009). An introduction to educational design research (pp. 53–73). Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. (2013). Educational design research: If it's so valuable, why is it so RARE? Retrieved from http://dbrxroads.coe.uga.edu/index.php/conference/
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T., & McKenney, S. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, P. (2013). Design-based research: Designing as research. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Vinters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 44–52). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., & Hoppe, U. (2013). Classroom orchestration: Synthesis. Computers & Education, 69, 523–526. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. (2013). 21st century educational design research. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Vinters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 388–396). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (2009). Methods for evaluating mobile learning. In G. Vavoula, N. Pachler, & A. Kukulska-Hulme (Eds.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 17–39). Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (1996). The paradox of case study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(2), 225–240. doi: 10.1080/0305764960260206
   Google Scholar
• Vavoula, G., Pachler, N., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar