A grounded theory approach to the understanding of creativity in common spaces of universities

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. S. Cummings (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123). Greenwich: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlow, J., & Brenner, C. (1964). Psychoanalytic concepts and the structural theory. Memoirs of Tottori College, 19(4), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, C. T. (1993). Qualitative research: The evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 263–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, X. (2006). Qualitative research in social sciences. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Chessick, R. D. (2001). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(3), 506–507. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 187–199. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2004.9651452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). On Runco’s problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2–3), 267–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1011–1026. doi: 10.3758/BF03196731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory proce­dures and techniques. Contemporary Sociology, 21(1), 138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2(5), 368–377.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2008). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In Handbook of creativity (Vol. 93, pp. 93–115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning & Instruction, 18(2), 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G., & Galton, F. (1870). Hereditary genius (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N. (1983). Creativity and individual differences in asymmetric cerebral hemispheric functioning. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1(1), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decom­position in insight problem solving. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1534–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science & Public Policy, 23(5), 279-286.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I., Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(November 2014), 295–308. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., & Hasenfus, N. (1978). EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process and effort to be original. Biological Psychology, 6(3), 157–167. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(78)90018-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., Hines, D., Mitchell, L., & Covello, E. (1984). EEG alpha asymmetry and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275–310. doi:10.1111/j.1467­6494.1996.tb00512.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U. E., Janssen, S., & Lugt, R. V. D. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity & Innovation Management, 16(1), 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, J., & Ross, P. (2006). Space to work: New office design. London: Laurence King.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A. K. (2003). A cultural model of creative and conforming behaviour. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 223–233. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2003.9651414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Press. doi:10.1016/B9780-7506-7009-8.50016-1.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Postle, B. R. (2003). Context in verbal short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1198–1207. doi: 10.3758/BF03195803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010). Creative reconstruction: A triple helix-based innovation strategy in central and eastern Europe countries. In M. Saad, & G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and practice of the triple helix model in developing countries: Issues and challenges (pp. 249–282). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, S. M., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Creativity: The role of unconscious processes in idea generation and idea selection. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. In J. C. Kaufman, J. Caaa, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behaviour: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475–494. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of aesthetics. Creativity and the Arts, S(1), 2–12. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.S.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Su, W. (2013). Sound environment and construction strategies in university campus base on knowledge innovation and mind-body growth research (PhD thesis). Harbin Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Su, W. (2014). Soundscape feature and optimization of knowledge innovation environments in the university campus. New Architecture, 5, 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: J. Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar genera­tion. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1992). Creative cognition. In Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807916.012
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki, A. P., & Nakamori, Y. (2005). Creative space: Models of creative processes for the knowl­edge civilization age. American School & University, 1(Summer), 288. doi: 10.1007/b137889
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. X., & Huang, X. T. (2013). Preliminary exploration on the structure of the concept of integrity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(3), 354–368. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00354
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, D., & Shi, J. (2005). Creative process: From the information processing perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 13(6), 721–727.
   Google Scholar