The effect of scenario-based interactive videos on English learning

References

• Altinok, H., & Acikgoz, K. U. (2006). İşbirlikli ve Bireysel Kavram Haritalarının Fen Bilgisi Dersine Yönelik Tutum Üzerindeki Etkileri.
   Google Scholar
• Avci, D. E., & Bayrak, E. B. (2013). Investigating teacher Candidates’ Opinions related to scenario-based learning: An action research. Elementary Education Online, 12(2), 528–549.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., & Zengin, B. (2008). Yabancı dil öğreniminde kaygı: Bir literatür özeti. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Aynal, S. (1989). Dramatizasyon yönteminin yaratıcı dil üzerindeki etkisi (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara: Ankara University, Social Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baleghizadeh, S., & Zarghami, Z. (2014). Student-generated tests and their impact on EFL students' learning of grammar (Öğrencilerin Ürettiği Testler ve Onların Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğrenen Öğrencilerin Dilbilgisi Öğrenimi Üzerindeki Etkisi). Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(3), 627–642.
   Google Scholar
• Breakey, K. M., Levin, D., Miller, I., & Hentges, K. E. (2008). The use of scenario-based-learning interactive software to create custom virtual laboratory scenarios for teaching genetics. Genetics, 179(3), 1151–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyukkantarcioglu, N. (2004). A sociolinguistic analysis of the present dimensions of English as a foreign language in Turkey. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 165, 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cakir, İ. (2010). Yazma becerisinin kazanılması yabancı dil öğretiminde neden zordur? Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(28), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Celen, İ, & Akar-Vural, R. (2009). Drama in education and teaching English: A research on the fourth grade elementary students. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 425–438.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, K. S., Ross, J. D., & Rogers, C. S. (2002). Evolution of a web-enhanced course: Incorporating strategies for self-regulation. Educause Quarterly, 25(1), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-M., & Wu, C.-H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, E. (2014). Second language learning through drama: Practical Techniques and Applications. Joe Winston (Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. 2012. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 792–795.
   Google Scholar
• Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresel, M., & Haugwitz, M. (2008). A computer-based approach to fostering motivation and self-regulated learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (2013). Constructivism and the technology of instruction. A conversation: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eitan, N., & Harel, D. (2011). Adaptive behavioral programming. Paper presented at the tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), 2011 23rd IEEE International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzoni, A. L., Ceballos, C. P., & Rubio, E. (2013). Interactive video enhanced learning-teaching process for digital native students. Paper presented at the Advanced learning Technologies (ICALT), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., & Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade student'mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 306–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. (1996). Statistical methods in psychology and education. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gokdemir, C. V. (2005). Üniversitelerimizde verilen yabancı dil öğretimindeki başarı durumumuz. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 251–264.
   Google Scholar
• Guvenc, H. (2010). The effects of Cooperative learning and learning Journals on teacher Candidates’ self-regulated learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1477–1487.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsell, T., & Yuen, S. C.-Y. (2006). Video streaming in online learning. AACE Journal, 14(1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Haslaman, T., & Askar, P. (2007). Investigating the relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in a programming course. HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 32, 110–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hegelheimer, V., & Fisher, D. (2006). Grammar, writing, and technology: A sample technology-supported approach to teaching grammar and improving writing for ESL learners. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg, M. L. (2001). Using drama to enhance the reading of narrative texts. The joint national conference of the Australian association for the teaching of english and the Australian literacy educators' association, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M. H. (2006). The effects of dramatic activities on reading comprehension of senior high school EFL students in Taiwan: ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, M., & Akdemir, O. (2013). The investigations of using web 2.0 technologies on English writing skills of students with different learning styles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kazazoglu, S. (2013). Türkçe ve ingilizce derslerine yönelik tutumun akademik başarıya etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(170), 295–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. T. (2013). Using video in the english literature classroom: Literary analysis, theology, cain, and kung fu. Video English Education, 14(3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learners for a while and what computers can contribute. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 425–435.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Meldrum, K. (2011). Preparing pre-service physical education teachers for uncertain future (s): A scenario-based learning case study from Australia. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(2), 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. Learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccoli, L. (2003). English through drama for oral skills development. ELT Journal, 57(2), 122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, F., & Amin, N. M. (2009). The effectiveness of customized courseware in teaching grammar. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of teaching and learning (ICTL 2009), INTI University College, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naba'h, A. A., Hussain, J., Al-Omari, A., & Shdeifat, S. (2009). The effect of computer assisted language learning in teaching English grammar on the achievement of secondary students in Jordan. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol., 6(4), 431–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu, S., Menon, M., Gunawardena, C., Lekamge, D., & Karunanayaka, S. (2007). How scenario-based learning can engender reflective practice in distance education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Ntelioglou, B. Y. (2006). Crossing borders: Drama in the second language classroom: ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Odabasi, F. (1994). Yabancı dilde dil bilgisi öğrenmede bilgisayar destekli öğrenme yönteminin öğrenci başarısına etkisi (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Eskisehir: Anadolu University, The Instutude of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Ozsevgec, L. C., & Kocadag, Y. (2013). The effects of scenario based learning approach to overcome the students’ misconceptions about inheritance. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. B., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Promoting self-Determination in Early elementary school teaching self-regulated problem-solving and goal-Setting skills. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekdag, B. (2010). Kimya öğreniminde alternatif yollar: Animasyon, simülasyon, video ve multimedya ile öğrenme. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 79–110.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. A., Whittaker, T. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2015). Intermediate statistics: A modern approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, B., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. Instructional-design theories and models. Mahwah: CM Reigeluth, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sever, S. (1995). Turkce Ogretiminde Tam Ogrenme. Istanbul: Ya-Pa Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, K. (2006). Self-regulated learning in technology-enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a European peer review. European Journal of Education, 41(3-4), 353–379.
   Google Scholar
• Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 307–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthiwartnarueput, T., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2012). Effects of using Facebook as a Medium for Discussions of English grammar and writing of Low-Intermediate EFL students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(2), 194–214.
   Google Scholar
• Tilfarlioglu, F. Y., & Yalcin, E. (2005). An analysis of the relationship between the use of grammar learning strategies and student achievement at English preparatory classes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2).
   Google Scholar
• Titiz, M. T. (2001). Ezbersiz eğitim yol haritası. Ankara: PegemA Yay.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, L. T., & Doan, N. T. M. (2010). Teaching English grammar through games. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(7), 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ubeyli, E. D. (2006). Biyomedikal Eğitiminde Bilişim Teknolojilerinin Kullanımı. XI. Türkiye'de Internet Konferansı, Ankara, Aralık.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z. (2015). Research on the English interactive reading teaching system under the information technology.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. C., Chen, C. H., & Jeng, M. C. (2010). Integrating video-capture virtual reality technology into a physically interactive learning environment for English learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1346–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanik, A. E. (2008). Primary school English teachers’ Perceptions of the English language Curriculum of 6th, 7th and 8th Grades. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Yassaei, S. (2012). Using Original Video and Sound Effects to Teach English. Paper presented at the English teaching forum.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L. (2015). Research on the key technology of the personalized English learning system. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Technology, Management and Humanities Science (ETMHS 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, Y. L. (2014). A Research of the Application of Visual Simulation Technology in College English Teaching. Paper presented at the Advanced Materials Research.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubairi, A. M., & Kassim, N. L. A. (2016). Classical and Rasch analyses of dichotomously scored reading comprehension test items. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 2(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar