917
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Engaging youth in computational thinking practices through designing place-based mobile games about local issues

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 302-315 | Received 13 Aug 2018, Accepted 27 Sep 2019, Published online: 04 Nov 2019

References

  • Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
  • Baretto, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1–25).
  • Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society (Rev. ed). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dikkers, S., Martin, J., & Coulter, B. (2012). Mobile media learning: Amazing uses of mobile devices for learning. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University: ETC Press. http://repository.cmu.edu/etcpress/62
  • Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577–598. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
  • Gagnon, D., Vang, R., & Litts, B. K. (2015). Learning through design: ARIS. In proceedings of the eleventh annual Games + Learning + Society Conference, ETC Press PA Pittsburgh, 282–288.
  • Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2011). Exploring computer science: A case study of school reform. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(2), 12.
  • Grover, S., & Basu, S. (2017, March). Measuring student learning in introductory block-based programming: Examining misconceptions of loops, variables, and Boolean logic. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 267–272). ACM.
  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. doi: 10.3102/0013189X12463051
  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032004003
  • Holden, C., Dikkers, S., Martin, J., & Litts, B. (2015). Mobile media learning: Innovation and inspiration. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University: ETC Press. http://repository.cmu.edu/etcpress/31
  • Holden, C. L., Gagnon, D. J., Litts, B. K., & Smith, G. (2014). ARIS: An open-source platform for widespread mobile augmented reality experimentation. In F. Neto (Ed.), Technology platform innovations and forthcoming trends in ubiquitous learning (pp. 19–34). Hershey, PA: IGI global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4542-4.ch002
  • Hung, P.-H., Lin, Y.-F., & Hwang, G.-J. (2010). Formative assessment design for PDA integrated ecology observation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 33–42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.3.33
  • Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2013). Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 61–65. doi: 10.1177/003172171309500111
  • Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1145/2576874
  • Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014, March). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities. Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 241–246). ACM.
  • Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007, April). Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1455–1464). ACM.
  • Lewis, W. E. (2018). Design scaffolding for computational making in the visual programming tool ARIS (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Utah State University. Retreived from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8346&context=etd
  • Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13511661
  • Litts, B. K., Kafai, Y. B., Lui, D. A., Walker, J. T., & Widman, S. A. (2017). Stitching codeable circuits: High school students’ learning about circuitry and coding with electronic textiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5), 494–507. doi: 10.1007/s10956-017-9694-0
  • Litts, B. K., & Lewis, W. E. (2019). Mobile augmented reality: Exploring a new genre of learning. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, 22(3), 5–9. doi: 10.1145/3308755.3308757
  • Litts, B. K., Martin, J., & Gagnon, D. J. (2013). Learning through design with ARIS Iteration 1: Digital literacies course [white paper]. Madison, WI: Mobile Learning Incubator.
  • Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
  • Mathews, J., & Holden, R. (2012). Place–based design for civic participation. In S. Dikkers, J. Martin, & B. Coulter (Eds.), Mobile media learning: Amazing uses of mobile devices for teaching and learning (pp. 131–148). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
  • Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2011). Habits of programming in Scratch. Proceedings of the 16th annual ITiCSE conference (Darmstadt, Germany, 2011) (pp. 168–172).
  • Morelli, R., De Lanerolle, T., Lake, P., Limardo, N., Tamotsu, E., & Uche, C. (2011). Can android app inventor bring computational thinking to k–12. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education (SIGCSE'11) (pp. 1–6).
  • Oulasvirta, A., Kurvinen, E., & Kankainen, T. (2003). Understanding contexts by being there: Case studies in bodystorming. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(2), 125–134. doi: 10.1007/s00779-003-0238-7
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
  • Peppler, K., & Glosson, D. (2013). Stitching circuits: Learning about circuitry through e-textile materials. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 751–763. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9428-2
  • Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7–30. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0901_3
  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., … Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. doi: 10.1145/1592761.1592779
  • Resnick, M., Myers, B., Nakakoji, K., Shneiderman, B., Pausch, R., Selker, T., & Eisenberg, M. (2005). Design principles for tools to support creative thinking. Workshop on creativity support tools sponsored by the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
  • Rode, J. A., Weibert, A., Marshall, A., Aal, K., von Rekowski, T., El Mimouni, H., & Booker, J. (2015, September). From computational thinking to computational making. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 239–250). ACM.
  • Ryokai, K., Lee, M. J., & Breitbart, J. M. (2009, October). Children’s storytelling and programming with robotic characters. In proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 19–28). ACM.
  • Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Searle, K. A., Casort, T., Litts, B. K., & Benson, S. (2017). Connecting space and narrative in Culturally Responsive making in ARIS with Indigenous youth. In proceedings of 2017 FabLearn conference on creativity and fabrication in education. ACM.
  • Searle, K. A., Casort, T., Litts, B. K., Brayboy, B. M. J., Dance, S. L., & Kafai, Y. B. (2018, June). Cultural repertoires: Indigenous youth creating with place and story. International conference of the learning sciences.
  • Shapiro, R. B., & Ahrens, M. (2016). Beyond blocks: Syntax and semantics. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 39–41. doi: 10.1145/2903751
  • Smith, B. K. (2014). Bodystorming mobile learning experiences. TechTrends, 58(1), 71–76. doi: 10.1007/s11528-013-0723-4
  • Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2014). Place-and community-based education in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Taylor, K. H. (2017). Learning along lines: Locative literacies for reading and writing the city. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4), 533–574. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2017.1307198
  • Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1-2), 65–93. doi: 10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5
  • Tsevreni, I. (2011). Towards an environmental education without scientific knowledge: An attempt to create an action model based on children's experiences, emotions and perceptions about their environment. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1080/13504621003637029
  • Wagler, M., & Mathews, J. (2012). Up River: Place, ethnography, and design in the St. Louis River estuary. In S. Dikkers, J. Martin, & B. Coulter (Eds.), Mobile media learning: Amazing uses of mobile devices for teaching and learning (pp. 41–60). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
  • Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
  • Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2015, July). Using commutative assessments to compare conceptual understanding in blocks-based and text-based programs. In ICER (Vol. 15, pp. 101–110).
  • White House. (2016). Computer science for all. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all
  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. doi: 10.1145/1118178.1118215

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.