7,414
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1029-1040 | Received 19 Aug 2019, Accepted 25 Aug 2020, Published online: 13 Sep 2020

References

  • Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241
  • Asikhia, O. A. (2010). Academic procrastination in mathematics: Causes, dangers and implications of counselling for effective learning. International Education Studies, 3(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n3p205
  • Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
  • Bae, C. L., & Lai, M. H. (2019). Opportunities to participate in science learning and student engagement: A mixed methods approach to examining person and context factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000410
  • Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
  • Bailin, S., & Battersby, M. (2017). What should I believe?: Teaching critical thinking for reasoned judgment. Teaching Philosophy, 40(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2017101672
  • Barak, M. (2018). Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change. Computers & Education, 121, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.016
  • Basham, J. D., Stahl, S., Hall, T., & Carter, R. A., Jr.. (2017). Establishing a student-centered environment to support all learners. In Christina M. Curran & Amy J. Petersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on classroom diversity and inclusive education practice (pp. 155–182). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
  • Bell, L. (2018). Procrastination: An effective guide on how to overcome procrastination, motivate yourself and make things happen. Scotts Valley, CA, USA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  • Bentley, F. J. B., Kennedy, S., & Semsar, K. (2011). How not to lose your students with concept maps. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 61–68.
  • Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  • Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2014). Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. Washington, DC, USA: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  • Davies, L. J. P., & Howard, R. M. (2016). Plagiarism and the internet: Fears, facts, and pedagogies. In Tracey Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 591–606). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
  • D’ Mello, S., Dieterle, E., & Duckworth, A. (2017). Advanced, analytic, automated (AAA) measurement of engagement during learning. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1281747
  • Dockerty, K. (2019). Developing pre-service teacher knowledge using online forums: Supporting confident and competent teaching practices. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1639260
  • Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927850
  • Feist, D., & Reid, D. (2018). Technology and teaching: Technology and student-centered pedagogy in 21st century classrooms. In Jared Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on digital content, mobile learning, and technology integration models in teacher education (pp. 69–87). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed . New York, NY, USA: Continuum.
  • Goksel, N., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Current insights and future perspectives. In Serap Sisman-Ugur & Gulsun Kurubacak (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp. 224–236). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
  • Gustavson, D. E., Miyake, A., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2014). Genetic relations among procrastination, impulsivity, and goal-management ability: Implications for the evolutionary origin of procrastination. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1178–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614526260
  • Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, USA: Routledge.
  • Harji, M. B., Ismail, Z., Chetty, T. N., & Letchumanan, K. (2017). Technical and non-technical programme students’ attitudes and reasons for plagiarism. English Language Teaching, 10(11), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p141
  • Hwang, G. J., & Chen, P. Y. (2019). Effects of a collective problem-solving promotion-based flipped classroom on students’ learning performances and interactive patterns. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1568263
  • Ison, D. C. (2018). An empirical analysis of differences in plagiarism among world cultures. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1479949
  • Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2018). Engineering students’ perceptions of problem solving and their future. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20190
  • Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space.. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757
  • Losh, E. (2014). The war on learning: Gaining ground in the digital university. Boston, USA: MIT Press.
  • Loveys, B. R., & Riggs, K. M. (2019). Flipping the laboratory: Improving student engagement and learning outcomes in second year science courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1533663
  • Lu, O. H., Huang, J. C., Huang, A. Y., & Yang, S. J. (2017). Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an MOOCs enabled collaborative programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1278391
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London: Sage Publications.
  • Molderez, I., & Fonseca, E. (2018). The efficacy of real-world experiences and service learning for fostering competences for sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4397–4410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.062
  • Mumford, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Pre-service language teachers reflection development through online interaction in a hybrid learning course. Computers & Education, 144, 103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103706
  • Nordstrom, K., & Korpelainen, P. (2011). Creativity and inspiration for problem solving in engineering education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560379
  • Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Café, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. St. Paul, MN, USA: Paragon House.
  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2002). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco, USA: Wiley.
  • Patrzek, J., Sattler, S., van Veen, F., Grunschel, C., & Fries, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: A panel study. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.854765
  • Pehmer, A.-K., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2015). How teacher professional development regarding classroom dialogue affects students’ higher-order learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.007
  • Peyrefitte, M., & Lazar, G. (2018). Student-centered pedagogy and real-world research: Using documents as sources of data in teaching social science skills and methods. Teaching Sociology, 46(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X17727835
  • Rabin, L. A., Fogel, J., & Nutter-Upham, K. E. (2011). Academic procrastination in college students: The role of self-reported executive function. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.518597
  • Ramdani, J. M., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). Student teachers’ engagement in Facebook-assisted peer assessment in an initial teacher education context: Speaking 2.0. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(3), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1599503
  • Saghafian, M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2018). A phenomenological study of teamwork in online and face-to-face student teams. Higher Education, 75(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0122-4
  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
  • Schultz, K. (2019). Distrust and educational change: Overcoming Barriers to just and lasting reform. Boston, USA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Simpson, C. (2017). Language, relationships and skills in mixed-nationality active learning classrooms. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1049141.
  • Skinner, B. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
  • Skinner, B. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128(3330), 969–977. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.128.3330.969
  • Starovoytova, D. (2017). Plagiarism under a magnifying-glass. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(15), 109–129.
  • van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003
  • Vuorela, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2004). How undergraduate students meet a new learning environment? Computers in Human Behavior, 20(6), 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.006
  • Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012
  • Wolters, C. A., Won, S., & Hussain, M. (2017). Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 12(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9174-1
  • Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss2/12
  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
  • Zhang, J. H., Zou, L. C., Miao, J. J., Zhang, Y. X., Hwang, G. J., & Zhu, Y. (2020). An individualized intervention approach to improving university students’ learning performance and interactive behaviors in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636078
  • Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2020). Team-based mobile learning supported by an intelligent system: Case study of stem students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696838

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.