Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective

References

• Ando, H., Cousins, R., & Young, C. (2014). Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: Development and refinement of a codebook. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.3.4
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaundran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Applying the Self-determination Theory (SDT) to explain student engagement and motivation in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. http://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016). Design of learning objects for concept learning: Effects of multimedia learning principles and an instructional approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1006237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K. F., & Hew, T. K. F. (2018). Asynchronous online discussion forum in MOOCs: Does openness matter for peer learning and performance? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3240
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K. F., Jong, M. S. Y., & Mok, I. A. C. (2020). Does learner expertise matter when designing emotional multimedia for learners of primary school mathematics? Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2305–2320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09775-4
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K. F., & Mok, I. A. C. (2017). Learner expertise and mathematics different order thinking skills in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 107, 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losier, G. F., Perreault, S., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Examining individual differences in the internalization of political values: Validation of the self-determination scale of political motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. A., Padesky, L. B., & Brock, C. H. (2020). Cultivating student agency through teachers’ professional learning. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation development and wellness. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). Motivation and autonomy in counseling, psychotherapy, and behavior change: A look at theory and practice 1ψ7. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(2), 193–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009359313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J. L., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why and how. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9193-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer, P., & Shea, T. (2011). Using online video to support student learning and engagement. College Teaching, 59(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.511313
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents perceptions of school environment, engagement and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Heddy, B. C., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2019). Examining engagement in context using experience-sampling method with mobile technology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101788
   Google Scholar