718
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: the impact of students’ perceptions of collaboration on their knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 3340-3359 | Received 05 Dec 2020, Accepted 03 May 2021, Published online: 19 May 2021

References

  • Abahussain, M. O. (2020). Investigating EFL learners’ perceptions of collaborative writing. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n3p32
  • Ab Latif, R., Mohamed, R., Dahlan, A., & Mat Nor, M. Z. (2016). Concept mapping as a teaching tool on critical thinking skills and academic performance of diploma nursing students. Education in Medicine Journal, 8(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v8i1.406
  • Alawaji, N. N. M. (2020). Students’ perceptions of collaborative summary writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(6), 700–707. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1006.11
  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge Univeristy Press.
  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
  • Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2006). Common ground, complex problems and decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(6), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9030-1
  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). The psychological structure of creative writing. Australian Journal of Education, 26(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494418202600104
  • Bixler, G. M., Brown, A., Way, D., Ledford, C., & Mahan, J. D. (2015). Collaborative concept mapping and critical thinking in fourth-year medical students. Clinical Pediatrics, 54(9), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922815590223
  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. In Bloom, B. S (Ed.),Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (pp. 45–144). New York, NY: David McKay.
  • Cai, H., & Gu, X. (2019). Factors that influence the different levels of individuals’ understanding after collaborative problem solving: The effects of shared representational guidance and prior knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1679841
  • Chan, J. W. W., & Pow, J. W. C. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787
  • Chan, C. C., Tsui, M. S., Chan, M. Y. C., & Hong, J. H. (2002). Applying the structure of the observed learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy on student’s learning outcomes: An empirical study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020282
  • Chang, C. C., Liu, G. Y., Chen, K. J., Huang, C. H., Lai, Y. M., & Yeh, T. K. (2017). The effects of a collaborative computer-based concept mapping strategy on geographic science performance in junior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5049–5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a
  • Chang, C. C., Yeh, T. K., & Shih, C. M. (2016). The effects of integrating computer-based concept mapping for physics learning in junior high school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2531–2542. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1284a
  • Cheng, L. C., & Chu, H. C. (2019). An innovative consensus map-embedded collaborative learning system for ER diagram learning: Sequential analysis of students’ learning achievements. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3) 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1482357
  • Chiou, C. C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802377240
  • Chiu, C. H., Huang, C. C., & Chang, W. T. (2000). The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers & Education, 34(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00025-1
  • Cho, Y. H., Ding, N., Tawfik, A., & Chávez, Ó. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping for learning to teach mathematics. The Journal of Appied Instructional Design, 4(1), 21–33.
  • Chu, H. C., Wang, C. C., & Wang, L. (2019). Impacts of concept map-based collaborative mobile gaming on English grammar learning performance and behaviors. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/26819619
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4104/
  • Dai, H., Zhang, F., & Chen, X. (1999). Psychological and Educational measurement. Jinan University Press.
  • Denner, J., Werner, L., Campe, S., & Ortiz, E. (2014). Pair programming: Under what conditions is it advantageous for middle school students? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.888272
  • De Weerd, J., Tan, E., & Stoyanov, S. (2017). Fostering interdisciplinary knowledge construction in computer-assisted collaborative concept mapping. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, & M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.). Proceedings of the European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 391–396). Cham, CH: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_32
  • Dias, S. B., Hadjileontiadou, S. J., Diniz, J. A., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2017). Computer-based concept mapping combined with learning management system use: An explorative study under the self- and collaborative-mode. Computers & Education, 107, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.009
  • Elorriaga, J. A., Arruarte, A., Calvo, I., Larrañaga, M., Rueda, U., & Herrán, E. (2013). Collaborative concept mapping activities in a classroom scenario. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(12), 1292–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.632649
  • Farrokhnia, M., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction. Computers & Education, 142, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103640
  • Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 340–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.748664
  • Govender, N. (2015). Developing pre-service teachers’ subject matter knowledge of electromagnetism by integrating concept maps and collaborative learning. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1104839
  • Greenberg, R. K., & Wilner, N. A. (2015). Using concept maps to provide an integrative framework for teaching the cost or managerial accounting course. Journal of Accounting Education, 33(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.11.001
  • Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
  • Haolader, F. A., Ali, M. R., & Foysol, K. M. (2015). The taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: Current practices at polytechnics in Bangladesh and its effects in developing students’ competences. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.2.2.9
  • Harkness, J. A., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (1998). Questionnaires in translation. In J. A. Harkness (Ed.), Cross-cultural survey equivalence (pp. 87–126). Germany (Open Access Repository).
  • Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student’s evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<55::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Harrison, S., & Gibbons, C. (2013). Nursing student perceptions of concept maps: From Theory to Practice. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(6), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.5480/10-465
  • Heeg, J., Hundertmark, S., & Schanze, S. (2020). The interplay between individual reflection and collaborative learning-seven essential features for designing fruitful classroom practices that develop students’ individual conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 765–788. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00175a
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
  • Hou, H. T. (2015). Integrating cluster and sequential analysis to explore learners’ flow and behavioral patterns in a simulation game with situated-learning context for science courses: A video-based process exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.010
  • Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01102.x
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299613
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. R. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
  • Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026
  • Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012
  • Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504544
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1) 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  • Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016
  • Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., Wu, S. Y., & Chang, K. E. (2014). Exploring college students’ cognitive processing patterns during a collaborative problem-solving teaching activity integrating Facebook discussion and simulation tools. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.001
  • Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 And 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00421.x
  • Machado, C. T., & Carvalho, A. A. (2020). Concept mapping: Benefits and challenges in higher education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1712579
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). A taxonomy for computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(6), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00020-1
  • Molinari, G. (2017). From learners’ concept maps of their similar or complementary prior knowledge to collaborative concept map: Dual eye-tracking and concept map analyses. Psychologie Française, 62(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2015.11.001
  • Mullins, D., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2011). Are two heads always better than one? Differential effects of collaboration on students’ computer-supported learning in mathematics. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9122-z
  • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., Popov, V., & Chizari, M. (2012). Effects of the Drewlite CSCL platform on students' learning outcomes. In A. Juan, T. Daradoumis, M. Roca, S. E. Grasman, & J. Faulin (Eds.). Collaborative and distributed e-research: Innovations in Technologies, Strategies and Applications (pp. 276–289). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0125-3.ch013
  • Novak, J. D., Bob Gowin, D., & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670511
  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377984
  • Qadir, F., Zehra, T., & Khan, I. (2011). Use of concept mapping as a facilitative tool to promote learning in pharmacology. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 21(8), 476–481. https://11/JCPSP.476481
  • Rafaeli, S., & Kent, C. (2015). Network-structured discussions for collaborative concept mapping and peer learning. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 59(6), 7:1–7:13. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2015.2461091
  • Roessger, K. M., Daley, B. J., & Hafez, D. A. (2018). Effects of teaching concept mapping using practice, feedback, and relational framing. Learning and Instruction, 54, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.011
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de l’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21432/t2859m
  • Stoyanova, N., & Kommers, P. (2002). Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1), 111–133. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/10783/
  • Sundararajan, N., Adesope, O., & Cavagnetto, A. (2018). The process of collaborative concept mapping in kindergarten and the effect on critical thinking skills. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 19(1), 5–13.
  • Timmers, S., Valcke, M., De Mil, K., & Baeyens, W. R. G. (2008). The impact of computer supported collaborative learning on internship outcomes of pharmacy students. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701288675
  • Trevisani, M., Cohrs, C. R., Soares, M. A. L., Duarte, J. M. D., Mancini, F., Pisa, I. T., & Domenico, E. B. L. (2016). Evaluation of learning in oncology of undergraduate nursing with the use of concept mapping. Journal of Cancer Education, 31(3), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0869-1
  • Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
  • Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2016). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7
  • Wang, M., Cheng, B., Chen, J., Mercer, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). The use of web-based collaborative concept mapping to support group learning and interaction in an online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.003
  • Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683
  • Wang, D., & Han, H. (2020). Applying learning analytics dashboards based on process-oriented feedback to improve students’ learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12502
  • Wheeler, L. A., & Collins, S. K. R. (2003). The influence of concept mapping on critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(6), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00134-0
  • Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00036-0
  • Wu, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2014). Exploring the process of planning and implementation phases in an online project-based discussion activity integrating a collaborative concept-mapping tool. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0089-6
  • Wu, S. Y., & Wang, S. M. (2020). Exploring the effects of gender grouping and the cognitive processing patterns of a Facebook-based online collaborative learning activity. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799026.
  • Wu, S. Y. (2020). Incorporation of collaborative problem solving and cognitive tools to improve higher cognitive processing in online discussion environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119828044
  • Yang, X., Li, J., & Xing, B. (2018). Behavioral patterns of knowledge construction in online cooperative translation activities. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.08.003
  • Zhang, S., Wen, Y., & Liu, Q. (2019). Exploring student teachers’ social knowledge construction behaviors and collective agency in an online collaborative learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674880

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.