Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm

References

• Asselman, A., Khaldi, M., & Aammou, S. (2020). Evaluating the impact of prior required scaffolding items on the improvement of student performance prediction. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3227–3249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asselman, A., Nasseh, A., & Aammou, S. (2018). Revealing strengths, weaknesses and prospects of Intelligent collaborative e-learning systems. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 3(3), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj030310
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Aleven, V. (2008). More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in Bayesian knowledge tracing. In Beverley P. Woolf, Esma Aïmeur, Roger Nkambou, Susanne Lajoie (Eds.), International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 406–415). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. Dans. In Peter Brusilovsky, Alfred Kobsa, Wolfgang Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web (pp. 3–53). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In New York, NY ACM 2016 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 785–794). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Chounta, I.-A., & Carvalho, P. F. (2019). Square it up! How to model step duration when predicting student performance. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 330–334). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2015). Student modeling for personalized education: A review of the literature. Dans. In Advances in personalized Web-Based education (pp. 1–24). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysafiadi, K., Virvou, M., & Sakkopoulos, E. (2020). Optimizing programming language learning through student modeling in an adaptive web-based educational environment. In Maria Virvou, Efthimios Alepis, George A. Tsihrintzis, Lakhmi C. Jain (Ed.), Dans machine learning paradigms (pp. 205–223). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vrieze, P. T., Van Bommel, P., Van Der Weide, T., & Klok, J. (2005). Adaptation in multimedia systems. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 25(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-005-6538-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, M., Heffernan, N., & Koedinger, K. (2009). Addressing the assessment challenge with an online system that tutors as it assesses. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-009-9063-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 1189–1232. doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Beck, J. E., & Heffernan, N. T. (2011). How to construct more accurate student models: Comparing and optimizing knowledge tracing and performance factor analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• González-Brenes, J., Huang, Y., & Brusilovsky, P. (2014). General features in knowledge tracing to model multiple subskills, temporal item response theory, and expert knowledge. In The 7th International Conference on Educational Data mining (pp. 84–91).
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., Abidi, S. M., & Ali, S. (2019). Using machine learning to predict student difficulties from learning session data. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(1), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9620-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajah, M. M., Huang, Y., González-Brenes, J. P., Mozer, M. C., & Brusilovsky, P. (2014). Integrating knowledge tracing and item response theory: A tale of two frameworks. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1181, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, N. P. (2001). Software Engineering for adaptive hypermedia systems-reference model. Modeling Techniques and Development Process.
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. (2010). A data repository for the EDM community: The PSLC DataShop. Handbook of Educational Data Mining, 43, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Maeta, K., Nishiyama, Y., Fujibayashi, K., Gunji, T., Sasabe, N., Iijima, K., & Naito, T. (2018). Prediction of glucose metabolism disorder risk using a machine learning algorithm: Pilot study. JMIR Diabetes, 3(4), e10212. https://doi.org/10.2196/10212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millán, E., Loboda, T., & Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L. (2010). Bayesian networks for student model engineering. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1663–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minn, S., Yu, Y., Desmarais, M. C., Zhu, F., & Vie, J.-J. (2018). Deep knowledge tracing and dynamic student classification for knowledge tracing. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 1182–1187). IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, D. (2016). Tree Boosting With XGBoost-Why Does XGBoost Win” Every” Machine Learning Competition? Master's thesis, NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Papoušek, J., Pelánek, R., Řihák, J., & Stanislav, V. (2015). An analysis of response times in adaptive practice of geography facts. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data mining (pp. 562–563).
   Google Scholar
• Pardos, Z. A., & Heffernan, N. T. (2010). Modeling individualization in a Bayesian networks implementation of knowledge tracing. In Paul De Bra, Alfred Kobsa, David Chin (Ed.), International conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization (pp. 255–266). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Pardos, Z. A., & Heffernan, N. T. (2011). KT-IDEM: Introducing item difficulty to the knowledge tracing model. In Joseph A. Konstan, Ricardo Conejo, José L. Marzo, Nuria Oliver (Ed.), International conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization (pp. 243–254). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg .
   Google Scholar
• Pardos, Z. A., & Yudelson, M. V. (2013). Towards moment of learning accuracy. AIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings, 4, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlik Jr, P., Cen, H., & Koedinger, K. (2009). Learning Factors Transfer Analysis: Using Learning Curve Analysis to Automatically Generate Domain Models. (ERIC, Éd.) Online Submission.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlik Jr, P. I., Cen, H., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). Performance Factors Analysis–A New Alternative to Knowledge Tracing. Online Submission.
   Google Scholar
• Pelánek, R. (2015). Modeling students’ memory for application in adaptive educational systems. International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pelánek, R. (2017). Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: An overview of learner modeling techniques. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(3-5), 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9193-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelánek, R. (2018). Exploring the utility of response times and wrong answers for adaptive learning. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, (p. 18).
   Google Scholar
• Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L. J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2015). Deep knowledge tracing. In C. Cortes and N. Lawrence and D. Lee and M. Sugiyama and R. Garnett (Ed.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 505–513).
   Google Scholar
• Rihák, J. (2015). Use of time Information in models behind adaptive system for building fluency in mathematics. International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Shahiri, A. M., & Husain, W. (2015). A review on predicting student's performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.157
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Heffernan, N. (2013). Extending knowledge tracing to allow partial credit: Using continuous versus binary nodes. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 181–188). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Heffernan, N. T. (2011). The “Assistance” model: Leveraging how many hints and attempts a student needs. Twenty-Fourth International FLAIRS Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Weibelzahl, S., Paramythis, A., & Masthoff, J. (2020). Evaluation of adaptive systems. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and personalization (pp. 394–395). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Woźniak, M., Grana, M., & Corchado, E. (2014). A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems. Information Fusion, 16, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, X., & Pardos, Z. A. (2011). An analysis of response time data for improving student performance prediction.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, X., Zhao, S., Van Inwegen, E. G., & Beck, J. E. (2016). Going deeper with deep knowledge tracing. International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Qian, L., Mao, B., Huang, C., Huang, B., & Si, Y. (2018). A data-driven design for fault detection of wind turbines using random forests and XGboost. IEEE Access, 6, 21020–21031. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2818678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z.-H. (2009). Ensemble learning. Encyclopedia of Biometrics, 1, 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_293
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z.-H. (2012). Ensemble methods: Foundations and algorithms. CRC press.
   Google Scholar