Supporting middle school students in a problem-based makerspace: investigating distributed scaffolding

References

• Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9074-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3d ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). Multi-scaffolding environment: An analysis of scaffolding and its impact on cognitive load and problem-solving ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.2190/Q58T-4388-8015-8141
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2016). A maker culture. Principal, 4, 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (Kindle ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1989). Motivating the notion of generic design within information processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine, 10(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v10i1.726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.2190/1GUB-8UE9-NW80-CQAD
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heraper, S. (2017). The philosophy of makerspaces. California School Library Association Journal, 40(2), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Creating a learning space in problema-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1334
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2015). Problem-based learning goals for learning and strategies for facilitating. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential Readings in problem-based learning (pp. 69–84). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1604
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, K. (2016). Makerspaces and design thinking: Perfect together!. The Education Digest, 82(4), 50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2015). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential Readings in problem-based learning (pp. 17–42). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Belland, B. R., & Axelrod, D. (2019). Scaffolding for optimal challenge in K–12 problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 921–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaughan, K. (2015). Theoretical anchors for Barrow’s PBL tutor guidelines. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning (pp. 57–68). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckim, C. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., & Norman, G. R. (1993). Reasoning and instruction in medical curricula. Cognition and Instruction, 10(4), 335–378. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S. (2015). Distributing scaffolding across multiple levels: Individuals, small groups, and a class of students. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential Readings in problem-based learning (pp. 207–222). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning (pp. 5–16). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2017). Using technology-enhanced learning environments to support problem-based historical inquiry in secondary school classrooms. In T. Brush, & J. Saye (Eds.), Successfully implementing problem-based learning in classrooms: Research in K-12 and teacher education (pp. 197–238). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servant-Miklos, V. F. C. (2018). Fifty years on: A restrospective on the world’s first problem-based learning programme at McMaster University Medical School. Health Professions Education, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Shin, S., Brush, T., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Designing and implementing web-based scaffolding tools for technology- enhanced socioscientific inquiry. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 1–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.20.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: The student’s perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1135
   Google Scholar
• Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1998). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. In D. Faulkner, K. Littleton, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning relationships in the classroom (pp. 93–110). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2009). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcyznski, V. (2015). Academic maker spaces and engineering design. American Society for Engineering Education, 26(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar