The acceptance of augmented reality in engineering education: the role of technology optimism and technology innovativeness

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akçayir, M., Akçayir, G., Pektaş, H., & Ocak, M. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Adwan, A. (2020). Investigating the drivers and barriers to MOOCs adoption: The perspective of TAM. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5771–5795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10250-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ajam, A., & Nor, K. (2015). Challenges of adoption of internet banking service in Yemen. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-01-2013-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Maroof, R., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Students acceptance of Google classroom: An exploratory study using PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(6), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rahmi, W., Alzahrani, A., Yahaya, N., Alalwan, N., & Kamin, Y. (2020). Digital communication: Information and communication technology (ICT) usage for education sustainability. Sustainability, 12(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquel, M. (2013). The effect of different interaction levels on instructional design learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1035–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.429
   Google Scholar
• Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş, & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers and Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, T., Williams, D., Knight, J., Baber, C., Gargalakos, M., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. (2011). A Human factors study of technology acceptance of a prototype mobile augmented reality system for Science education. Advanced Science Letters, 4(11), 3342–3352. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.2044
   Google Scholar
• Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The role of perceived enjoyment in the students’ acceptance of an augmented reality Teaching platform: A structural equation modelling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.24846/v19i3y201011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Fernández-Martínez, M. (2019b). Educational uses of augmented reality (AR): experiences in educational science. Sustainability, 11(18), 4990–4918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabero-Almenara, J., Fernández-Batanero, J., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2019a). Heliyon adoption of augmented reality technology by university students. Heliyon, 5(5), e01597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S., Liu, E., Shen, Y., Liu, C., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2020). Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: Impact on student’ s learning gains and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares. In How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses, Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
   Google Scholar
• Chung, N., Han, H., & Joun, Y. (2015). Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Cárdenas, J., Guadalupe-Lanas, J., Ramos-Galarza, C., & Palacio-Fierro, A. (2021). Drivers of technology readiness and motivations for consumption in explaining the tendency of consumers to use technology-based services. Journal of Business Research, 122, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubillo, J., Martin, S., Castro, M., & Meier, R. (2012). Control of a remote laboratory by augmented reality. IEEE International Conference on Teaching Assessment and Learning for Engineering, W2B-11–W2B-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360297
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, M., Teixeira, J., Cavalcante, S., & Teichrieb, V. (2019). Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: A systematic review. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 25(3), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-019-0084-8
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
   Google Scholar
• Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R., & Swan, J. (2018). A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(37), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkstra, T., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 81, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, H., Shih, W., & Ha, Q. (2020). Effects of mobile augmented reality apps on impulse buying behavior: An investigation in the tourism field. Heliyon, 6(8), e04667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfeky, A., & Elbyaly, M. (2021). Developing skills of fashion design by augmented reality technology in higher education technology in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558259
   Google Scholar
• Eraslan, M., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students’ acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414–2432. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F., Pujol-Jover, M., Gázquez-Abad, J., & Alegret, A. (2018). An extension of the technology acceptance model for online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1421560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiner, S., Macintyre, B., & Seligmann, D. (1993). Knowledge-based augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, 36(7), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/159544.159587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, T. (2007). Principles of electric circuits. Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, F., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Univ of Akron Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Gavish, N., Gutiérrez, T., Webel, S., Rodríguez, J., Peveri, M., Bockholt, U., & Tecchia, F. (2015). Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 778–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.815221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4), https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
   Google Scholar
• Gilly, M., Celsi, M., & Schau, H. (2012). It don’t come easy: Overcoming obstacles to technology use within a resistant Consumer group. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(1), 62–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01218.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hult, T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
   Google Scholar
• Hanif, A., Jamal, F., & Imran, M. (2018). Extending the technology acceptance model for use of e-learning systems by digital learners. IEEE Access, 6, 73395–73404. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? Quality and Quantity, 52(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0689-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Liaw, S., & Lai, C. (2016). Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: A case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibáñez, M., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, I., Azizan, S., & Azman, N. (2011). Accessing innovativeness of distance learners toward their readiness in embracing technology. African Journal of Business Management, 5(33), 12768–12776. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.824
   Google Scholar
• Kamal, S., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., Straub, D., & Chervany, N. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/249751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, D., Mantri, A., & Horan, B. (2019). Design implications for adaptive augmented reality based interactive learning environment for improved concept comprehension in engineering paradigms. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674885
   Google Scholar
• Kros, J., Richey, R., Chen, H., & Nadler, S. (2011). Technology emergence between mandate and acceptance: An exploratory examination of RFID. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(7), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111154143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Wu, J. (2011). The structural relationships between optimism and innovative behavior: Understanding potential antecedents and mediating effects. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.571184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., & Chang, H. (2011). The role of technology readiness in self-service technology acceptance. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111146289
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Shih, H., & Sher, P. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology and Marketing, 24(7), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, C., Sun, C., & Chen, C. (2017). Evaluate learner’s acceptance of augmented reality based military decision-making process training system. International Conference on Information and Education Technology, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029387.3029418
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Gutierrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M., & Mora, C. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computer in Human Behaviour, 51, 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matcha, W., & Awang, D. (2012). User preference in collaborative science learning through the use of augmented reality. International Conference on Engineering Education, 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2012.6779271
   Google Scholar
• Nesterov, A., Shishkov, A., Kholodilin, I., & Vanin, P. (2017). Augmented reality in engineering education: Opportunities and advantages. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 19(4), 117–120. Retrieved from http://komunikacie.uniza.sk/index.php/communications/article/view/280
   Google Scholar
• Ngafeeson, M. (2015). E-Book acceptance among undergraduate students: A Look at the moderating role of technology innovativeness. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 10(3), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2015070103
   Google Scholar
• Odeh, S., Shanab, S., Anabtawi, M., & Hodrob, R. (2013). A remote engineering LAB based on augmented reality for Teaching electronics. International Journal of Online Engineering, 9. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJOE.V9IS5.2496
   Google Scholar
• Opriş, I., Costinaş, S., Ionescu, C., & Nistoran, D. (2017). Towards augmented reality in power engineering. International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATEE.2017.7905160
   Google Scholar
• Pantano, E., Rese, A., & Baier, D. (2017). Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
   Google Scholar
• Perry, A. (2016). Consumers’ acceptance of smart virtual closets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribeanu, C., Balog, A., & Iordache, D. (2017). Measuring the perceived quality of an AR-based learning application: A multidimensional model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosavljevic, S., Radosavljevic, V., & Grgurovic, B. (2020). The potential of implementing augmented reality into vocational higher education through mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1528286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restivo, M., Rodrigues, J., & Chouzal, M. (2014). Let's work with AR in DC circuits. International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, 884–885. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2014.7017890
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). Editor’s comments: A critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), III–VIII. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. http://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Ringle, C., Thiele, K., & Gudergan, S. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, B., & Mantri, A. (2020). Assimilating disruptive technology: A new approach of learning science in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.132
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B., Harwick, J., & Warshaw, P. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-nalysis of past research with recommendation for modification and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sırakaya, M., & Sırakaya, D. (2020). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souvestre, F., Anastassova, M., González, E., Gutiérrez, A., Benito, J., & Barak, M. (2014). Learner-centered evaluation of an augmented reality system for embedded engineering education. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, 4, 31–34. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014F675
   Google Scholar
• Taneja, A., Wang, A., & Raja, M. (2006). Assessing the impact of concern for privacy and innovation characteristics in the adoption of biometric technologies. Annual Conference of Decision Sciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Lee, C., & Chai, C. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theotokis, A., Vlachos, P., & Pramatari, K. (2008). The moderating role of customer-technology contact on attitude towards technology-based services. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(4), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo-Morales, P., & Sanchez-Garcia, J. (2018). Use of augmented reality in Social Sciences as educational resource. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.444635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Anne, A., & Ropp, T. (2016). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand aviation students’ perceptions toward augmented reality maintenance training instruction. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 3(4), https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2016.1144
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Vandenberg, R., & Edwards, J. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903065683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., & Chen, J. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziyae, B., Mobaraki, M., & Saeediyoun, M. (2015). The effect of psychological capital on innovation in information technology. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 5(8), doi:10.1186/s40497-015-0024-9
   Google Scholar