Real-time virtual reality co-creation: collective intelligence and consciousness for student engagement and focused attention within online communities

References

• Bakker, A. B., Sanz Vergel, A. I., & Kuntze, J. (2014). Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9422-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, M., Scali, F., Poletti, G., Guerreschi, A., Fontana, F., & Hohenstein, U. T. (2018). Virtual portable art: un percorso virtuale per le pietre incise di Riparo Tagliente. Sezione di Museologia Scientifica e Naturalistica, 13, 120–122. https://doi.org/10.15160/1824-2707/1534
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., & Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy, (Eds.), Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality (pp. 57–124). Hillsdale , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. (2019). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, J. L.-H., & D’Alessandro, S. (2011). Co-creating value in higher education: The role of Interactive classroom response technologies. Asian Social Science, 7(11), https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n11p35
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, E., Messeter, J., & Binder, T. (2008). Formatting design dialogues – games and participation. CoDesign, 4(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880801905724
   Google Scholar
• Broek, P. V. D., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades. In The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading (pp. 1-31).
   Google Scholar
• Burde, D., Kapit, A., Wahl, R. L., Guven, O., & Skarpeteig, M. I. (2016). Education in emergencies: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 619–658. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316671594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. (2006). Reflecting on the creativity agenda in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600865801
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasiri, A., Collett, J., Fassbender, E., & De Foe, A. (2019). A virtual reality approach to mindfulness skills training. Virtual Reality, 24(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00380-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, A., Conrad, M., & Shukla, M. (2018). Increasing student engagement through virtual interactions: How? Virtual Reality, 22(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0330-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for scalability: A case study of the river city curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9156-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2013). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2013.805694
   Google Scholar
• Crescentini, C., Chittaro, L., Capurso, V., Sioni, R., & Fabbro, F. (2016). Psychological and physiological responses to stressful situations in immersive virtual reality: Differences between users who practice mindfulness meditation and controls. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Méndez, M., & Gummesson, E. (2012). Value co-creation and university teaching quality: Consequences for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231211260422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, E. (2016). Design Thinking: a framework for student engagement? A personal view. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v2i1.317
   Google Scholar
• Durall, E., Bauters, M., Hietala, I., Leinonen, T., & Kapros, E. (2020). Co-creation and co-design in technology-enhanced learning: Innovating science learning outside the classroom. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 42, 202–226.
   Google Scholar
• Elsharnouby, T. H. (2015). Student co-creation behavior in higher education: The role of satisfaction with the university experience. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(2), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2015.1059919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerstrøm, A., & Ghinea, G. (2013). Co-creation of value in higher education: Using social network marketing in the recruitment of students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2013.748524
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). "A Literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives," in Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE), 2015 April 23–24. Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Giner, G. R., & Peralt Rillo, A. (2016). Structural equation modeling of co-creation and its influence on the student’s satisfaction and loyalty towards university. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 291, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2015.02.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GmbH, D. (2017). CoSpaces EDU: Create virtually anything in the classroom. https://cospaces.io/edu/
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189 ( 09336671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., & Kuh†, G. D. (2002). Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, R. E. (1990). Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jans, S. D., Geit, K. V., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., & Veirman, M. D. (2017). Using games to raise awareness: How to co-design serious mini-games? Computers & Education, 110(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. (2019). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 15(2), 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1637100
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-Based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. University of Massachusetts Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, L. (2011). Triple E Framework. https://www.tripleeframework.com/
   Google Scholar
• Kothgassner, O. D., Felnhofer, A., Hlavacs, H., Beutl, L., Palme, R., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Glenk, L. M. (2016). Salivary cortisol and cardiovascular reactivity to a public speaking task in a virtual and real-life environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, S. (2017). Build your own battle field: Using technology to understand the American Revolution. https://blog.cospaces.io/build-your-own-battle-field-30eddd18097d
   Google Scholar
• Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2018). Virtual memory palaces: Immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, R. (2014). Examination of allostasis and online laboratory simulations in a middle school science classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A., Gregor, S., & Ewing, M. (2008). Developing a scale to measure the enjoyment of Web experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(4), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2018). Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207
   Google Scholar
• Maples-Keller, J. L., Bunnell, B. E., Kim, S. J., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2017). The Use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 25(3), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of Top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 72–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/747349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro, C., Stromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Haro, M. V., Lopez-Del-Hoyo, Y., Campos, D., Linehan, M. M., Hoffman, H. G., Garcia-Palacios, A., Modrego-Alarcón, M., Borao, L., García-Campayo, J., & Garcia-Campayo, J. (2017). Meditation experts try virtual reality mindfulness: A pilot study evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of virtual reality to facilitate mindfulness practice in people attending a mindfulness conference. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Broek, P. v. d., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why Is It important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T., Long, G. L., & Foster, S. B. (2004). Academic engagement in students with a hearing loss in distance education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enh009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2018). The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002012
   Google Scholar
• Schlacht, I. L., Mastro, A. D., & Nazir, S. (2017). Virtual reality for safety, entertainment or education: the Mars mission test. In Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation (pp. 75-83).
   Google Scholar
• Schmeil, A., & Eppler, M. J. (2008). Knowledge sharing and collaborative learning in second life: A classification of virtual 3D group interaction scripts. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(3), 665–677.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2018). Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 431–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spike, J. (2020). Re: Virtual Reality Activities that Engage, Enhance, and Extend Student Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining presence. In Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 33-56).
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C.-Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers & Education, 72, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C.-Y., & Hsieh, P.-H. (2018). Application of a gamified interactive response system to enhance the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, student engagement, and attention of English learners. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 104–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C.-Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J.-M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential Among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valmaggia, L. R., Latif, L., Kempton, M. J., & Rus-Calafell, M. (2016). Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: An systematic review of recent evidence. Psychiatry Research, 236, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. R., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2002). Virtual reality: A technology in need of IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.00820
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yar Hamidi, D., Solomon, G., Wennberg, K., & Berglund, H. (2008). Creativity in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810871691
   Google Scholar