Educational games promote the development of students’ computational thinking: a meta-analytic review

References

• Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayman, R., Sharaf, N., Ahmed, G., & Abdennadher, S. (2018). Minicolon; Teaching kids computational thinking using an interactive serious game. In S. Göbel, A. Garcia-Agundez, T. Tregel, M. Ma, J. Baalsrud Hauge, M. Oliveira, T. Marsh, & P. Caserman (Eds.), Serious games, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11243, pp. 79–90). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02762-9_9
   Google Scholar
• Backlund, P., & Hendrix, M. (2013). Educational games - are they worth the effort? A literature survey of the effectiveness of serious games. In Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2013.6624226
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. J. (2009). Model-based meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9552-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., & Bachu, E. (2015). Enhancing the metacognitive skill of novice programmers through collaborative learning. In A. Pena-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 277–298). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_11
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakoulas, A., & Xinogalos, S. (2018). A pilot study on the effectiveness and acceptance of an educational game for teaching programming concepts to primary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2029–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9702-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirumi, A., & Kebritchi, M. (2008). Examining the pedagogical foundations of modern educational computer games. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1729–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2013). Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., Chapleau, M.-A., Paquin, K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. E., Beach, S. A., & Badarak, G. (1989). Modeling the relationship between achievement and class size: A re-analysis of the Tennessee project STAR data. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(1), 34–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569209538669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piteira, M., & Haddad, S. R. (2011). Innovate in your program computer class: An approach based on a serious game. ITICSE July 13: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education. http://doi.org/10.1145/2016716.2016730
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Pinkwart, N., Butz, M., Trautwein, U., & Ninaus, M. (2017). Training computational thinking: Game-based unplugged and plugged-in activities in primary school. 11th European conference on game-based learning, on Austria: Gratz.
   Google Scholar
• Vahldicka, A., & Faraha, P. R. (2020). A blocks-based serious game to support introductory computer programming in undergraduate education. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100037
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, K. P., Goldsmith, L., & Pasquale, M. (2019). Integrating computational thinking into elementary science curriculum: An examination of activities that support students’ computational thinking in the service of disciplinary learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09801-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Holbert, N., Horn, M. S., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Computational thinking in constructionist video games. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2016010101
   Google Scholar
• Whitton, N. (2010). Learning with digital games: A practical guide to engaging students in higher education. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y. (2018). The development and challenges of computational thinking board games. 2018 1st international cognitive cities conference (IC3).
   Google Scholar