Effect of design-based learning on elementary students computational thinking skills in visual programming maker course

References

• Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker, T., Bakker, S., Douma, I., Van Der Poel, J., & Scheltenaar, K. (2015). Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK Robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), n2. https://ecrp.illinois.edu/v12n2/bers.html
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association, Vancouver, Canada (Vol. 1, p. 25). http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cetin, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2017). Reflective abstraction in computational thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. H. (2006). Thinking creatively in action and movement, revised Chinese version. Psychological Publishing Co., Ltd. (In Chinese). Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement | RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/104317/1/v12n4p425.pdf https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (1998). Making a case for design-based learning, arts Education policy. Review, 100(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632919809599450.
   Google Scholar
• Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v10i2.a.2
   Google Scholar
• Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban high school students’ IT/STEM learning: Findings from a collaborative inquiry-and design-based afterschool program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. (2014, January). The Australian digital technologies curriculum: challenge and opportunity. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (Vol. 148, pp. 3–12). doi:10.5555/2667490.2667491.
   Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., & Corral, L. (2015, September). Students want to create apps: leveraging computational thinking to teach mobile software development. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 21–26). http://doi.org/10.1145/2808006.2808033
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, S., Han, S., & Kim, S. (2017). Effect of design-based learning on improving computational thinking. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1188415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9376-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Mauriello, L., Ahn, J., & Bederson, B. B. (2014). CTArcade: Computational thinking with games in school age children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Mak, K., Vong, P., Lu, S., & Leung, S. O. (2020). Towards a performing creative characteristics scale (PCCS) for Chinese young children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–85. https://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/papers/MehaliketalJEE2008.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehalik, M., & Schunn, C. (2007). What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 519. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol22-3/12_ijee1752.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/441.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Puente, S. G., Van Eijck, M., & Jochems, W. (2013). Empirical validation of characteristics of design-based learning in higher education. International Journal Engineering Educucation, 29(2), 491–503. urn:nbn:nl:ui:25-ab8b82a1-3c7c-44d9-bf63-0882f4be4499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raber, C. (2015). Design-Based Learning for the Elementary School Classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Emily Carr University of Art and Design]. Rowman & Littlefield publishing group, Inc. London.
   Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugarcia, A., Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., & Stice, J. E. (2000). The future of engineering education I. A Vision for a new Century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 16–25. https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/123094
   Google Scholar
• Saritepeci, M. (2020). Developing computational thinking skills of high school students: Design-based learning activities and programming tasks. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00480-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1981). Thinking creatively in action and movement. Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vong, P., Cheng, W., Wu, H. P., Kam, S., & Liu, K. (2017). Effects of high-activity and high-energy play vs. Low-activity and low-energy play on Hong Kong preschool boys’ and girls’ creativity. Creative Education, 8(15), 2377–2392. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.815162
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing, 2014, 26. http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp = 279.html
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., & Shute, V. J. (2019). Can playing a video game foster computational thinking skills? Computers & Education, 141, 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar