Interactive features of E-texts’ effects on learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Almekhlafi, A. G. (2021). The effect of E-books on preservice student teachers’ achievement and perceptions in the United Arab Emirates. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1001–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10298-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Asrowi, A., Hadaya, A., & Hanif, M. (2019). The impact of using the interactive e-book on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12245a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Blake, J. S. (2016). Use of an Interactivat iTextbook in a college nutrition course: Effects on student comprehension, knowledge, application, and engagement. Unpublished dissertation. Boston University. https://hdl.handle.net/2144/19510
   Google Scholar
• Bos, L. T., De Koning, B. B., Wassenburg, S. I., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Training inference making skills using a situation model approach improves reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brown, K. (2016). Designing for comprehension: A comparison of interactive and non- interactive textbooks. Unpublished dissertation. Iowa State University. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15669
   Google Scholar
• *Chang, L., Wu, T. T., & Su, C. Y. (2019). The influence of interactive and non-interactive e-book on the learning effectiveness of high and low achievement nursing students. In L. Inønningsbakk, T. T. Wu, F. Sandnes, & Y. M. Huang (Eds.), International conference on innovative technologies and learning (pp. 14–23). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhri, V. K., Cheng, B., Overtholtzer, A., Roschelle, J., Spaulding, A., Clark, P., Greaves, M., & Gunning, D. (2013). Inquire biology: A textbook that answers questions. AI Magazine, 34(3), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., & Chen, F. Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, G-D., Chang, C-K., Wang, C-Y., & Jian, X-L. (2018). Development and evaluation of a novel e-book interface for scaffolding thinking context to learn from writing examples. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1427113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. (2015). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach, 5th edition. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dennis, A. R., Abaci, S., Morrone, A. S., Plaskoff, J., & McNamara, K. O. (2016). Effects of e-textbook instructor annotations on learner performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9109-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, L., & Koseska, V. (2009). Classifiers and digital dictionaries. Cognitive Studies| Études Cognitives, 9, 117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ebied, M. M. A., & Rahman, S. A. A. (2015). The effect of interactive e-book on students’ achievement at Najran University in computer in education course. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 71–82. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079544.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E. (2014). robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295
   Google Scholar
• Freund, L., Kopak, R., & O’Brien, H. (2016). The effects of textual environment on reading comprehension: Implications for searching as learning. Journal of Information Science, 42(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515614472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42–60. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T., Ebert, D. D. (2019b). dmetar: Companion R Package for the guide ‘Doing Meta-Analysis in R’. R package version 0.0.9000, http://dmetar.protectlab.org
   Google Scholar
• Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2019a). Doing meta-analysis in R: A hands-on guide. https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/
   Google Scholar
• Harri-Augstein, S., Smith, M., & Thomas, L. (2017). Reading to learn. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. London, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration. www.handbook.cochrane.org
   Google Scholar
• *Hsiao, C. C., Tiao, M. M., & Chen, C. C. (2016). Using interactive multimedia e-books for learning blood cell morphology in pediatric hematology. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0816-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Jin, S. H. (2013). Visual design guidelines for improving learning from dynamic and interactive digital text. Computers & Education, 63, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Koć-Januchta, M. M., Schönborn, K. J., Tibell, L. A., Chaudhri, V. K., & Heller, H. C. (2020). Engaging with biology by asking questions: Investigating students’ interaction and learning with an artificial intelligence-enriched textbook. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1190–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120921581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N. (2017). An integrative framework for studying, designing and conceptualising interactivity in children’s digital books. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1168–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Li, L.-Y., Chen, G.-D., & Yang, S.-J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Liu, Y., Chou, P. L., & Lee, B. O. (2020). Effect of an interactive e-book on nursing students’ electrocardiogram-related learning achievement: A quasi-experimental design. Nurse Education Today, 90, 104427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2018). Effect size computation for meta analysis. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=esc
   Google Scholar
• *Lustria, M. L. A. (2007). Can interactivity make a difference? Effects of interactivity on the comprehension of and attitudes toward online health content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., & van der Weel, A. (2016). The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 50(3), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first-and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mochizuki, T., Nishimori, T., Tsubakimoto, M., Oura, H., Sato, T., Johansson, H., Nakahara, J., & Yamauchi, Y. (2019). Development of software to support argumentative reading and writing by means of creating a graphic organizer from an electronic text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1197–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09676-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, N. P., & Lambe, J. (2017). Multimedia interactive ebooks in laboratory bioscience education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1338531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/747758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815618428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, R., Comeau, E., Matchett, B., Biderman, M., Doria, N., Joy, P., & Numer, M. (2020). Interactive E-Texts and Students: A Scoping Review. Canadian Journal of Education, 43(1), 258–287. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1248468.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sidi, Y., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2016). Generalizing screen inferiority – does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks? Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sommers, S. R., Shin, L. M., Greenebaum, S. L., Merker, J., & Sanders, A. S. (2019). Quasi-experimental and experimental assessment of electronic textbook experiences: Student perceptions and test performance. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000129
   Google Scholar
• *Stirling, A., & Birt, J. (2014). An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse, G. A., & Ganea, P. A. (2017). A print book preference: Caregivers report higher child enjoyment and more adult–child interactions when reading print than electronic books. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 12, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Sungkhasettee, V. W., Friedman, M. C., & Castel, A. D. (2011). Memory and metamemory for inverted words: Illusions of competency and desirable difficulties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 973–978. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0114-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, E. K., Nielen, T. M., & de Jong, M. T. S. (2019). Supporting learning from text: A meta-analysis on the timing and content of effective feedback. Educational Research Review, 28, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E. E., Tipton, E., & Polanin, J. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *ter Beek, M., Opdenakker, M. C., Spijkerboer, A. W., Brummer, L., Ozinga, H. W., & Strijbos, J. W. (2019). Scaffolding expository history text reading: Effects on adolescents’ comprehension, self-regulation, and motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2015). Small-Sample adjustments for tests of moderators and model Fit using robust variance estimation in meta-regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40(6), 604–634. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615606099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Weng, C., Otanga, S., Weng, A., & Cox, J. (2018). Effects of interactivity in E-textbooks on 7th graders science learning and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 120, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What works clearinghouse: Standards Handbook Version 4.1. Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
   Google Scholar
• Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In 8th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2014), pp. 321–330.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.523285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zarzour, H., & Sellami, M. (2017). A linked data-based collaborative annotation system for increasing learning achievements. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9497-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zarzour, H., & Sellami, M. (2018a). An investigation into whether learning performance can be improved by CAALDT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(6), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1286997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zarzour, H., & Sellami, M. (2018b). Effects of a linked data-based annotation approach on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1446989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar