A consumer-oriented design thinking model for product design education

References

• Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., & Chang, V. (2020). Evaluation framework for smart disaster response systems in uncertainty environment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 145, 106941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saggaf, A., Nasir, H., & Hegazy, T. (2020). An analytical hierarchy process-based system to evaluate the life-cycle performance of buildings at early design stage. Journal of Building Engineering, 31, 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In G. Patrick (Ed.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2019). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Cartier, P. (2011). Most valuable aspects of educational expectations of the students in design education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2187–2191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.077
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Lopez, A., Cervero, A., Galve-González, C., Puente, J., & Bernardo, A. B. (2021). Evaluating critical success factors in the permanence in Higher Education using multi-criteria decision-making. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1877631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., & Suh, J. (2019). Understanding spatial ability in interior design education: 2D-to-3D visualization proficiency as a predictor of design performance. Journal of Interior Design, 44(3), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1994). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (3rd ed). John Wiley & Sons Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills (Vol. 20, pp. 51–76). Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• De FSM Russo, R., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081
   Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J. (2013). Design thinking. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2535915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (1997). Describing design: A comparison of paradigms. Technische Universiteit Delft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3
   Google Scholar
• Dou, R., Li, W., & Nan, G. (2019). An integrated approach for dynamic customer requirement identification for product development. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(4), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2018.1526321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstsen, J., & Nazir, S. (2020). Performance assessment in full-scale simulators–A case of maritime pilotage operations. Safety Science, 129, 104775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Qu, Q. X., Nagamachi, M., & Duffy, V. G. (2020). A proposal of the event-related potential method to effectively identify Kansei words for assessing product design features in Kansei engineering research. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 76, 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. X., & Ma, M. Y. (2018). The study of charm factor of stationery shop. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 21(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2017.1420559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. X., & Ma, M. Y. (2019). Study on the attractiveness factors of online courses. Education Sciences, 9(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, C. (1950). On the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02919500
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. H., & Hou, K. C. (2015). Exploring the attractive factors of App icons. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, 9(6), 2251–2270. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2015.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S. W., Hsu, C. F., & Tang, K. W. (2013). A consultation and simulation system for product color planning based on interactive genetic algorithms. Color Research & Application, 38(5), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.21730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S. W., & Ko, Y. C. (2013). A study on bicycle appearance preference by using FCE and FAHP. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 43(4), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S. W., & Tsai, H. C. (2005). Applying a hybrid approach based on fuzzy neural network and genetic algorithm to product form design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(5), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2004.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S. W., Yang, M. H., & Lee, C. H. (2017). An aesthetic measurement method for matching colours in product design. Color Research & Application, 42(5), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, T. C., Wang, T. I., Su, C. Y., & Lee, M. C. (2012). A fuzzy logic-based personalized learning system for supporting adaptive English learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 273–288. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75271/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, O., Chapagain, B., Kharel, G., Poudyal, N. C., Murray, B. D., & Mehmood, S. R. (2020). Benefits and challenges of online instruction in agriculture and natural resource education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1725896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). A theory of personality. Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. (2005). New techniques in industrial design education. In L. Valentine (Ed.), the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design proceedings, Design system evolution (pp. 29–30). Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler, S., Robert, J., Derigent, W., Voisin, A., & Le Traon, Y. (2016). A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 398–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Shieh, M. D., & Yang, C. C. (2019). A posterior preference articulation approach to Kansei engineering system for product form design. Research in Engineering Design, 30(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0297-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, K. H. (2017). The abilities of understanding spatial relations, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization affect 3D product design performance: Using carton box design as an example. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9330-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Lu, P. (2019). Research on product modeling design program based on finite structure method. In G. Xun (Ed.), the International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering (IJCIME) (pp. 311–315). Osaka, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCIME49369.2019.00069
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. H., Ko, Y. C., & Hsiao, S. W. (2015). A study that applies aesthetic theory and genetic algorithms to product form optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P., & Hsiao, S. W. (2019). Research on product design education based on evaluation grid method. In G. Xun (Ed.), the International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering (IJCIME) (pp. 267–271). Osaka, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCIME49369.2019.00060
   Google Scholar
• Lu, P., Hsiao, S. W., & Wu, F. (2021). A product shape design and evaluation model based on morphology preference and macroscopic shape information. Entropy, 23(6), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhu, P., Dhanalakshmi, C. S., & Mathew, M. (2020). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a suitable biomass material for maximum bio-oil yield during pyrolysis. Fuel, 277, 118109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marunić, G., & Glažar, V. (2014). Improvement and assessment of spatial ability in engineering education. Engineering Review, 34(2), 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, M., Round, H., & Pitsis, T. S. (2020). Design thinking inspired crowdsourcing: Toward a generative model of complex problem solving. California Management Review, 62(3), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620918626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, Y., Luo, H., & Sun, D. (2021). Design and validation of a diagnostic MOOC evaluation method combining AHP and text mining algorithms. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1802298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Barrios, M. A., Aleman-Romero, B. A., Rebolledo-Rudas, J., Maldonado-Mestre, H., Montes-Villa, L., De Felice, F., & Petrillo, A. (2017). The analytic decision-making preference model to evaluate the disaster readiness in emergency departments: The ADT model. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(5–6), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, 52, 4–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012). Design thinking research. Springer-Verlarg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandars, J., & Goh, P. S. (2020). Design thinking in medical education: The key features and practical application. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520926518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, K. S. (2013). Measuring the sociocultural appeal of SNS games in Taiwan. Internet Research, 23(3), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241311331781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2010). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Tschimmel, K. (2011). Design as a perception-in-action process. Springer-Verlag Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. In I. Bitran (Ed.), the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) (pp. 1–20). Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, F. K., Cetinkaya, S., & Ustun, C. (2016). A methodological framework to analyze stakeholder preferences and propose strategic pathways for a sustainable university. Higher Education, 72(6), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9973-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Harcourt Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. W., & Zhang, J. M. (2019). Research on innovative design and evaluation of agricultural machinery products. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8179851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Liu, M. R. (2018). Application of QFD and AHP in railway freight transportation. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 24(1), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2018.01.025
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Zhou, M. (2020). A method for product form design of integrating interactive genetic algorithm with the interval hesitation time and user satisfaction. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 76, 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weightman, D., & McDonagh, D. (2006). The new landscape of design: Cool hunting and other opportunities. Industrial Design Society of America, 9, 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B., & Singh, M. G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.259681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. P., Tian, H. L., & Jiao, S. J. (2019). Product design evaluation method using consensus measurement, network analysis, and AHP. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4042024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. Y., & Li, J. (2019). Design for environmental protection: Measuring the appeal factors of Green product for consumers. Ekoloji Dergisi, 28(107), 1699–1707.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Liu, S. F., & Wang, K. (2019). Explorations of charm factors and development of fishing in southern Taiwan based on Miryoku engineering and the analytic network process. Sustainability, 11(3), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar