Designing and evaluating a mobile peer tutoring application: a cultural historical activity theory approach

References

• Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bakare, J., & Orji, C. T. (2019). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and direct learning environment on sophomores’ academic achievement in electronic and computer fundamentals. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9808-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). Peer learning as a pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426. https://doi-org.libproxy.nie.edu.sg/10.1080/03075070500249138
   Google Scholar
• Boz Yaman, B. (2019). A multiple case study: What happens in tutoring in calculus studies? International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.328336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1998). Determinants of help seeking: Relations between perceived reasons for classroom help-avoiding and help-seeking behaviors in an experimental context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakiroglu, U., & Öngoz, S. (2017). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in remedying misconceptions of operating system concepts: A design-based approach. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1249–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9490-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education, 50(1), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619847
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Glaveanu, V. (2012). On third generation activity theory: Interview with Yrjö Engeström. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 515–518. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.555
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K., & Groleau, C. (2011). Contradictions, transitions, and materiality in organizing processes: An activity theory perspective. First Monday, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i6.3479
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2005). Constant comparative method. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950558
   Google Scholar
• Gazula, S., McKenna, L., Cooper, S., & Paliadelis, P. (2017). A systematic review of reciprocal peer tutoring within tertiary health profession educational programs. Health Professions Education, 3(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Classroom and technology-supported help seeking: The need for converging research paradigms. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1&2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200105
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P., & Churchill, D. (2016). Mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. A., Farrow, N., Lindeman, B. M., & Lidor, A. O. (2017). Impact of near-peer teaching rounds on student satisfaction in the basic surgical clerkship. The American Journal of Surgery, 213(6), 1163–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, C.-K., So, H.-J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9102-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. M., Northey, E. E., & Khalil, M. K. (2017). The effect of near-peer tutoring on medical students’ performance in anatomical and physiological sciences. Clinical Anatomy, 30(7), 922–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, C. (2018). Motivational aspects of using near peers as role models. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/us/files/7315/6948/6880/CambridgePapersInELT_NearPeers_2018_ONLINE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelson-Le Gall, S., & Jones, E. (1990). Cognitive-motivational influences on the task-related help-seeking behavior of Black children. Child Development, 61(2), 581–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, R. S. (2000). Social influences on the development of children’s adaptive help seeking: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Developmental Review, 20(3), 350–404. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, R. S. (2002). How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L., Arreguín-Anderson, M. G., Yuen, T. T., Ek, L. D., Sánchez, P., Machado-Casas, M., & García, A. (2016). Four cases of a sociocultural approach to mobile learning in La Clase Mágica, an afterschool technology club. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, E. L., Quinn, P. J., Davies, B., & Fotheringham, V. (2016). How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2018). Peer etutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. C., Chung, S. H., Cheung, Y. L., Looi, C. K., & Wong, W. H. (2020). Holistic design of a mobile peer tutoring application based on learning and user needs analysis. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of innovate learning summit 2020 (pp. 673–684). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–257). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2008). Peer-assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., Dehkinet, R., Blanch, S., Corcelles, M., & Duran, D. (2013). Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring. Computers & Education, 61, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westera, W., de Bakker, G., & Wagemans, L. (2009). Self-arrangement of fleeting student pairs: A Web 2.0 approach for peer tutoring. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 341–349. doi:10.1080/10494820903195249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar