Student disengagement in web-based videoconferencing supported online learning: an activity theory perspective

References

• Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 315–342). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_15
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L., & Turck, M. A. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. A. (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1102–1113. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1332
   Google Scholar
• Chipchase, L., Davidson, M., Blackstock, F., Bye, R., Clothier, P., Klupp, N., Nickson, W., Turner, D., & Williams, M. (2017). Conceptualising and measuring student disengagement in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p31
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, M. A., Miller, A. W., Spruill, W. J., Cobb, H. H., Reinhardt, B. O., Terry, A. V., Reese, R. L., & Wade, W. E. (2000). Influence of interactive videoconferencing on the performance of pharmacy students and instructors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64(2), 152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole-Gomolski, B. (1999). Web training requires different educational approach. Computer World, 33(8), 44.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, R., & Donaldson, A. J. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction (updated Ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, A.-P., Liu, C., & Xu, F. (2020). Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Distance Education, 41(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, W. R. (2005). Shyness and students’ perceptions of seminars. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 4(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2004.4.1.27
   Google Scholar
• Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2013). Impact of cold-calling on student voluntary participation. Journal of Management Education, 37(3), 305–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912446067
   Google Scholar
• Demiraslan, Y., & Usluel, Y. K. (2008). ICT integration processes in Turkish schools: Using activity theory to study issues and contradictions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. E., & Graham Brown, C. (2019). An examination of student disengagement and reengagement from an alternative high school. School Leadership Review, 14(1), 5–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2020, April 29). How to combat Zoom fatigue. Harvard Business Review, 1–7. https://hbr.org/2020/04/how-to-combat-zoom-fatigue
   Google Scholar
• Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, H., & Hadjerrouit, S. (2020). An activity theory perspective on contradictions in flipped mathematics classrooms at the university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 520–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1591533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
   Google Scholar
• Gedera, D. S. P. (2016). The application of activity theory in identifying contradictions in a university blended learning course. In D. S. P. Gedera & P. J. Williams (Eds.), Activity theory in education (pp. 53–69). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). Why increased social presence through web videoconferencing does not automatically lead to improved learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.31
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N. (2000). Student distress in a web-based distance education course. Information, Communication & Society, 3(4), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180010002297
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F. (2018). Unpacking the strategies of ten highly-rated MOOCs: Implications for engaging students in large online courses. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions, and future research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Webb, M. (2009). Integrating ICT to higher education in China: From the perspective of activity theory. Education and Information Technologies, 14(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9084-6
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaschik, S. (2018, April 2). Lecture instruction: Alive and not so well. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/04/02/study-finds-lecture-remains-dominant-form-teaching-stem
   Google Scholar
• Joo, K. P. (2014). A cultural-historical activity theory investigation of contradictions in open and distance higher education among alienated adult learners in Korea National Open University. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karal, H., Çebi, A., & Turgut, Y. E. (2011). Perceptions of students who take synchronous courses through video conferencing about distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 276–293.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, R. S., & Stamatakis, M. K. (2006). Comparison of students’ performance in and satisfaction with a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Papadopoulos, K., & Sritanyaratana, L. (2014). Showing face in video instruction: Effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Butterworth–Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T., Comber, C., Gage, J., & Cullum-Hanshaw, A. (2010). Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.513761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, D. (2020, March 18). Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for online learning? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/03/18/most-teaching-going-remote-will-help-or-hurt-online-learning
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K. (2017). Examining the flipped classroom through action research. Mathematics Teacher, 110(8), 624–627. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.110.8.0624
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391.
   Google Scholar
• MacLaughlin, E. J., Supernaw, R. B., & Howard, K. A. (2004). Impact of distance learning using videoconferencing technology on student performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(3), 58–56. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj680358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2012). Motivation and engagement: Conceptual, operational, and empirical clarity. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 303–311). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_14
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Parker, M. (2014). Use of synchronous virtual classrooms: Why, who, and how? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 192–192.
   Google Scholar
• Marwan, A., & Sweeney, T. (2019). Using activity theory to analyse contradictions in English teachers’ technology integration. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0418-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, R. A., & Wieland, R. L. (2010). Using videoconferencing to establish and maintain a social presence in online learning environments. Educational Considerations, 37(2), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.1152
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Manzanares, M. A. R. (2008). Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathik, M., & Jonathan, S. G. (2013). Effect of facial expressions on student’s comprehension recognition in virtual educational environments. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulman, C. (2020, April 9). I used to shut my windows to New York’s noise. Now I long for a honking horn. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/04/09/new-york-silent-coronavirus/
   Google Scholar
• Shope, T. C., McManus, J. F., August, S. E., Mattos, N. L., Vollucci, T. C., & Sparks, P. R. (2020). Instructor prompts and student engagement in synchronous online nutrition classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(3), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1726166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W.-C. (2004). Is humor an appreciated teaching tool? Perceptions of professors’. teaching Styles and use of Humor. College Teaching, 52(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.52.1.14-20
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. (1998). Desktop videoconferencing: Experiences of complete users, wary users, and non-users. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 257–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/249666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, J., & Gibson, D. (2005). Video communications: The whole picture (CMP telecom & networks). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482295672
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar