A K-6 computational thinking curricular framework: pedagogical implications for teaching practice

References

• Allan, W., Coulter, B., Denner, J., Erickson, J., Lee, I., Malyn-Smith, J., & Martin, F. (2010). Computational thinking for youth. White Paper for the ITEST Small Working Group on Computational Thinking (CT). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.352.3303&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57. https://www.j-ets.net/collection/published-issues/19_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda, G., & Ferguson, J. P. (2018). Unplugged programming: The future of teaching computational thinking? Pedagogika, 68(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2018.859
   Google Scholar
• Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20–23. 18910
   Google Scholar
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S. (2016). Fostering synergistic learning of computational thinking and middle school science in computer-based intelligent learning environments (Order No. 10151674). [Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University] ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (1815802003).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20–29. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/50117
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Witten, I. H., & Fellows, M. (2015). CS unplugged. www.csunplugged.org
   Google Scholar
• Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9552-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, C., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002(1), 123–145. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8850/
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). An atom is known by the company it keeps: A constructionist learning environment for materials science using agent-based modeling. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(2), 81–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9148-8
   Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016, June). Developing computational thinking: Approaches and orientations in K-12 education. Proceedings of EdMedia 2016–World Conference on Educational Media and Technolog, Vancouver, BC, Canada (AACE), (pp. 13–18). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172925/
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K. (2011). Creative computing: A design-based introduction to computational thinking. https://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/curriculumguide-v20110923.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada (Vol. 1, p. 25). http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeland, J., Bruce, M., & Hariharan, A. (2013). The missing piece: A national teacher survey on how social and emotional learning can empower children and transform schools. A Report for CASEL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED558068
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1977). The process of education. Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1960). http://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/10-%20The%20Process%20of%20Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67–69. 1399
   Google Scholar
• Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged approaches to computational thinking: A historical perspective. TechTrends, 64(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiprianov, V., & Gallon, L. (2016, July). Introducing computational thinking to k-5 in a French context. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Arequipa, Peru (pp. 112–117). https://doi.org/10.1145/2899415.2899439
   Google Scholar
• Cicirello, V. A. (2013). A CS unplugged activity for the online classroom. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(6), 162–168. https://www.cicirello.org/publications/cicirello-ccscne2013-unplugged.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, C., & Miller, E. (2000). Fool's gold: A critical look at computers in childhood. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED445803
   Google Scholar
• Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2014). Developing computational thinking in the classroom: A framework. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/369594/
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellance & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–76). Solution Tree Press. http://sttechnology.pbworks.com/f/Dede_(2010)_Comparing%20Frameworks%20for%2021st%20Century%20Skills.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C., Mishra, P., & Voogt, J. (2013). Working group 6: Advancing computational thinking in 21st century learning. International Summit on ICT in Education, 1–6. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19486883.pdf
   Google Scholar
• del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of primary education. Computers & Education, 150, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J., & Freeman, P. A. (2009). The profession of IT computing's paradigm. Communications of the ACM, 52(12), 28–30. dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/ https://doi.org/10.1145/1610252.1610265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSchryver, M. D., & Yadav, A. (2015). Creative and computational thinking in the context of new literacies: Working with teachers to scaffold complex technology-mediated approaches to teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(3), 411–431. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/151572/
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. Elsevier Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED437928
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. MIT Press. http://beyondbitsandatoms.org/readings/disessa2001changing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (2007). Imagination, past and present. In K. Egan, M. Stout, & K. Takaya (Eds.), Teaching and learning outside the box: Inspiring imagination across the curriculum (pp. 3–20). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feurzeig, W., Papert, S. A., & Lawler, B. (2011). Programming-languages as a conceptual framework for teaching mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903520040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39(4), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1992). Multiple intelligences (Vol. 5, p. 56). Minnesota Center for Arts Education.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2011). Releasing the imagination. NJ, 34(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2011.11649524
   Google Scholar
• Gretter, S., & Yadav, A. (2016). Computational thinking and media & information literacy: An integrated approach to teaching twenty-first century skills. TechTrends, 60(5), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0098-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., Jackiw, N., Lundh, P., & Basu, S. (2018). Combining non-programming activities with programming for introducing foundational computing concepts. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS]. https://doi.org/10.2318/cscl2018.925
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, W. (2007). The new Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 108(4), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.108.4.7-16
   Google Scholar
• Helding, L. (2009). Mindful voice: Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. Journal of Singing-The Official Journal of the National Association of Teachers of Singing, 66(2), 193–199. https://www.proquest.com/openview/60617d4b54bd68a8adc3d7847584f711/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=41612
   Google Scholar
• Hemmendinger, D. (2010). A plea for modesty. ACM Inroads, 1(2), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805724.1805725
   Google Scholar
• Herro, D., Quigley, C., Plank, H., & Abimbade, O. (2021). Understanding students’ social interactions during making activities designed to promote computational thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1884824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howland, K., Good, J., & Nicholson, K. (2009, September). Language-based support for computational thinking. IEEE symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 147–150). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2009.5295278
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., & Looi, C. K. (2021). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 31(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, M., Pearson, J., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, S. R., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Computational thinking and literacy. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26716/jcsi.2018.01.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. White paper for the MacArthur Foundation. https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/jenkins_white_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2013). Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053492
   Google Scholar
• Kakavas, P., & Ugolini, F. C. (2019). Computational thinking in primary education: A systematic literature review. Research on Education and Media, 11(2), 64–94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258852
   Google Scholar
• Kalelioglu, F., Gulbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596. https://www.bjmc.lu.lv/contents/vol-42016-no-3/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katai, Z., Osztian, E., & Lorincz, B. (2021). Investigating the computational thinking ability of young school students across grade levels in two different types of Romanian educational institutions. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, V., Park, S., & Wiebe, E. (2021). The code-centric nature of computational thinking education: A review of trends and issues in computational thinking education research. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998, December). Learning by design from theory to practice. Proceedings of the international conference of the Learning Sciences, Charlottesville, VA (Vol. 98, pp. 16–22). https://www.cc.gatech.edu/projects/lbd/htmlpubs/lbdtheorytoprac.html
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, Ö, Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosic, M. (2018). Media literacy and for the net generation. International Journal of Emotional Education, 10(1), 68–88. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1177650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2016). Reclaiming the roots of CT. CSTA Voice: The Voice of K–12 Computer Science Education and Its Educators, 12(1), 3–4. http://www.witty.ca/uploads/4/7/6/4/4764474/csta_voice_magazine__march_2016-pp3-5-compthinking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Letonsaari, M. (2018). June). Extended cognition hypothesis applied to computational thinking in computer science education. In Y. Shi, H. Fu, Y. Tian, V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, M. H. Lees, J. Dongarra, & P. M. A. Sloot (Eds.), Computational science – ICCS 2018, vol 10862 (pp. 304–317). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93713-7_25
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Xu, S., & Liu, J. (2021). Development and validation of computational thinking assessment of Chinese elementary school students. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909211010240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2011). Concrete and other neo-Piagetian forms of reasoning in the novice programmer. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, Perth, Australia (Vol. 114, pp. 9–18). http://hdl.handle.net/10453/17580
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, S. (2012). Big Data is great, but don’t forget intuition. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/30/technology/big-data-is-great-but-dont-forget-intuition.html
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. (2009, March). Thinking about computational thinking. Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, Chattanooga, TN (pp. 260–264). https://doi.org/10.1145/1508865.1508959
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Yadav, A., & Deep-Play Research Group (2013). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends, 57(3), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0655-z
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010). Committee for the workshops on computational thinking: Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, T. W. (2006). Towards a pedagogy of imagination: A phenomenological case study of holistic education. Ethnography and Education, 1(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820600715455
   Google Scholar
• Nishida, T., Kanemune, S., Idosaka, Y., Namiki, M., Bell, T., & Kuno, Y. (2009). A CS unplugged design pattern. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508951
   Google Scholar
• Orvalho, J. (2017, July). Computational thinking for teacher education. Scratch2017BDX: Opening, Inspiring, Connecting, Bordeaux, France (p. 6). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01555455/
   Google Scholar
• Pane, J. F., & Myers, B. A. (2001). Studying the language and structure in non-programmers’ solutions to programming problems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. A. (2020). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic books. http://www.medientheorie.com/doc/papert_mindstorms.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1–11. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.691.4506&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2019). The development and application of computational fairy tales for elementary students. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n3p159
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K. (2010). Media arts: Arts education for a digital age. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2118–2153. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009650
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7–18. http://rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/viewArticle/11
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, A. (2017). Ways of learning: Learning theories for the classroom (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315460611
   Google Scholar
• Richtel, M. (2011). A Silicon Valley school that doesn’t compute. The New York Times, Vol. 22, p. 91. http://www.goldenbridgesschool.org/uploads/1/9/5/4/19541249/at-waldorf-school-in-silicon-valley-technology-can-wait-nytimes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rijke, W. J., Bollen, L., Eysink, T. H., & Tolboom, J. L. (2018). Computational thinking in primary school: An examination of abstraction and decomposition in different age groups. Informatics in Education, 17(1), 77–92. https://infedu.vu.lt/journal/INFEDU/article/55/info https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, J. A., Weibert, A., Marshall, A., Aal, K., von Rekowski, T., El Mimouni, H., & Booker, J. (2015, September). From computational thinking to computational making. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on Per Vasive and Ubiquitous Computing, New York, NY (pp. 239–250). https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804261
   Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Sabitzer, B., Antonitsch, P. K., & Pasterk, S. (2014, November). Informatics concepts for primary education: Preparing children for computational thinking. Proceedings of the 9th workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Berlin, Germany (pp. 108–111). https://doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670778
   Google Scholar
• Sabitzer, B., Demarle-Meusel, H., & Jarnig, M. (2018, April). Computational thinking through modeling in language lessons. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain (pp. 1913–1919). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363469
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, C. C. (2014). How can the teaching of programming be used to enhance computational thinking skills? [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton]. University of Southampton Institutional Repository. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/366256/
   Google Scholar
• Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2014). Refining an understanding of computational thinking (pp. 1–23). University of Southampton. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/372410/
   Google Scholar
• Settle, A., Goldberg, D. S., & Barr, V. (2013, July). Beyond computer science: Computational thinking across disciplines. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, New York, NY (pp. 311–312). https://doi.org/10.1145/2462476.2462511
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. (1954). A modern art of education. Stenographic transcripts of lectures, unrevised by the author, given in Ilkley, England, 5th–17th August, 1923.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. (1996). The child’s changing consciousness: As the basis of pedagogical practice (Vol. 16). Steiner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, S. A. (2015). Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2021). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonbuloglu, B., & Tonbuloglu, I. (2019). The effect of unplugged coding activities on computational thinking skills of middle school students. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 403–426. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1233542 https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Training computational thinking through board games: The case of Crabs & Turtles. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsortanidou, X., Daradoumis, T., & Barberá, E. (2019). Connecting moments of creativity, computational thinking, collaboration and new media literacy skills. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(11/12), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-05-2019-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsortanidou, X., Daradoumis, T., & Barberá-Gregori, E. (2020). Convergence among imagination, social-emotional learning and media literacy: An integrative literature review. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1753720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, P. (2011). Imagination as a transformative tool in primary school education. RoSE–Research on Steiner Education, 2(2), 16–34. https://www.rosejourn.com/index.php/rose/article/view/71/99
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, B. (2008). Computing curriculum suggestions for a Waldorf School. Association of Waldorf Schools of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing, 2014. http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp=279.html
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. //dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/ https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2011, March). Computational thinking. https://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/WingCTPrez.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2017, October). Computational thinking: What and why. Presentation slides from Trippel Helix conference on Computational Thinking and Digital Competencies in Primary and Secondary Education, Stockholm, Sweden (pp. 1580695435–1378800312). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/presentation/d20a/a49744877f2bb98d6ad303742be7bd025fcd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolz, U., Stone, M., Pearson, K., Pulimood, S. M., & Switzer, M. (2011). Computational thinking and expository writing in the middle school. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993073
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning. BMJ, 326(7384), 328–330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2011). A new approach toward digital storytelling: An activity focused on writing self-efficacy in a virtual learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 181–191. https://www.j-ets.net/collection/published-issues/14_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Good, J., Voogt, J., & Fisser, P. (2017). Computational thinking as an emerging competence domain. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Competence-based vocational and professional education (Vol. 23, pp. 1051–1067). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_49
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011, March). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, Dallas, TX (pp. 465–470). https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297
   Google Scholar