Automated tracking of student revisions in response to teacher feedback in EFL writing: technological feasibility and teachers' perspectives

References

• Allen, D., & Millis, A. (2016). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814561902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi, E., & Tabrizi, A. R. N. (2016). The effects of direct vs. indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learner’s writing accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1), 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, M., & Evans, N. (2013). Principles and practices for response in second language writing: Developing self-regulated learners. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python. O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013a). Feedback in Higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013b). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. (2017a). Towards an automatic classification system for supporting the development of critical reflective skills in L2 learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. (2017b). The impact of online automated feedback on students’ reflective journal writing in an EFL course. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. (2019). Exploring the effects of automated tracking of student responses to teacher feedback in draft revision: Evidence from an undergraduate EFL writing course. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1655769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G., Chen, J., Foung, D., Lam, V., & Tom, M. (2018). Towards automatic classification of teacher feedback on student writing. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(5), 342–346. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.5.1060
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, G., & Ng, W. S. (2018). Using an automated approach to classify EFL students’ revisions of their academic writing. In Y. Kawasaki & C.-K. Li (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 International conference on education and global studies (pp. 174–180). Hyogo University of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Teacher written feedback on English as a Foreign Language learners’ writing: Examining native and nonnative English-speaking teachers’ practices in feedback provision. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 629921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X
   Google Scholar
• Diab, R. L. (2005). EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2012). Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing class in Japan. System, 42, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, E. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ writing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438
   Google Scholar
• Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/356602
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903197883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. (2015). Written corrective feedback in L2 writing: Connors & Lunsford (1988); Lunsford & Lunsford (2008); Lalande (1982). Language Teaching, 48(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L., & Chen, J. (1999). An investigation into the effectiveness of teacher feedback on student writing. English Language Teaching and Learning, 3, 207–219.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperly, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible learning insights. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (2004). What triggers revision? In L. Chanquoy, P. Largy, & L. Allal (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9–20). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading writing and language processing (pp. 176–241). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.466
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2013). Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The effect of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students’ writing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018
   Google Scholar
• Javadi-Safa, A. (2018). A brief overview of key issues in second language writing teaching and research. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.2p.15
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T., Cheng, C.-C., & Chang, K.-E. (2015). Computer-supported cooperative perwriting for enhancing young EFL learners’ writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 134–155. 10125/44421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2011). Working smarter, not working harder: Revisiting teacher feedback in the L2 writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.67.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707–710.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-C. (2016). Using automated writing evaluation to reduce grammar errors in writing. ELT Journal, 70(3), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006a). Analysing online revision. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 157–188). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006b). Writing and the analysis of revision: An overview. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 31–44). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students’ affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Osidak, V., Kavytska, T., & Drobotun, V. (2020). Integrating teacher feedback and assessment to improve L2 writing. In S. Hidri (Ed.), Changing language assessment: New dimensions, new challenges (pp. 223–251). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, A. (2018). A feedback model for data-rich learning experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, Z., & Li, X. (2017). Native and non-native teachers’ perceptions of error gravity: The effects of cultural and educational factors. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1-2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0326-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali, R., & Jupri, R. (2014). Exploring teacher written feedback and student revisions on ESL students’ writing. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(5), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19556370
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), The handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. 2 (pp. 593–610). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/356588
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treglia, M. O. (2008). Feedback on feedback: Exploring student responses to teachers’ written commentary. Journal of Basic Writing, 27(1), 105–137. https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.2008.27.1.06
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3087, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 38(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076157
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, M. M., & Azad, M. A. K. (2012). Feedback in EFL writing at tertiary level: Teachers’ and learners’ perceptions. ASA University Review, 6(1), 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Accessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar