Profiling high school students’ multimodal posting in a digital literacy SPOC and examining teachers’ and students’ perceptions

References

• Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568042
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. W. Y. (2020). Analyzing online comments: A language-awareness approach to cultivating digital literacies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1569068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-Y., Kuo, H.-Y., & Hsieh, T.C. (2019). New literacy practice in a Facebook group: The case of a residential learning community. Computers & Education, 134, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). A grammar of multimodality. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(2), 361–426. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i02/46137
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education, 59(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, M. (2014). Migrating literacies: Multimodal texts and digitally enabled text making. Text & Talk, 34(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, J. C., Bose, D., Lowenthal, P. R., York, C. S., Atkinson, M., & Murtagh, J. (2016). What sunshine is to flowers: A literature review on the use of emoticons to support online learning. In S. Y. Tettegah & M. Gartmeier (Eds.), Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 163–183). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, R., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., & Rolim, V. (2018). Towards combined network and text analytics of student discourse in online discussions. In C. Penstein Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, R. Luckin, M. Mavrikis, K. Porayska-Pomsta, B. McLaren, & B. du Boulay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_9.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). E. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, M. L., McCarty, R., Gurvitz, D., & Sitkoski, I. (2018). Five key principles: Guided inquiry with multimodal text sets. The Reading Teacher, 72(6), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E. (2017). Expanding argument instruction: Incorporating multimodality and digital tools. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(5), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E., Butler, T., & Reinking, D. (2017). Integrating multimodal arguments into high school writing instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17700456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T., Chiu, Y. C. J., & Yeh, H. C. (2013). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., & Robinson, A. J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The John D. and Catherine MacArthur Foundation. http://www.newmedialiteracies.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/NMLWhitePaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, S., Smith, B. E., & Shen, J. (2021). Examining how different modes mediate adolescents’ interactions during their collaborative multimodal composing processes. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JISC. (2014). Developing digital literacies. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing-digital-literacies
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Long, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhou, S., & Alexander, J. (2021). Teacher professional identity development through digital stories. Computers & Education, 162, 104040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Yatsu, D. K., & Li, Y. (2021). A multimodal model for analyzing middle school English language learners’ digital stories. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100067
   Google Scholar
• Kim, G. M. (2015). Transcultural digital literacies: Cross-border connections and self-representations in an online forum. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., Meng, X., & Kim, M. (2021). Technology-enhanced multiliteracies teaching towards a culturally responsive curriculum: A multiliteracies approach to ECE. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1870503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, S. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, D. L., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2016). Digital literacies go to school: A cross-case analysis of the literacy practices used in a classroom-based social network site. Computers in the Schools, 33(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1179025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, C. (2019). Promoting critical digital literacy in the leisure-time center: Views and practices among Swedish leisure-time teachers. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 14(3–4), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-03-04-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing & Technology, 3(2), 56–77. https://silo.tips/download/a-content-analysis-method-to-measure-critical-thinking-in-face-to-face-and-compu
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, G., Wildy, H., & Berman, Y. (2020). Multimodal digital text creation using tablets and open-ended creative apps to improve the literacy learning of children in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798418779171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimmer, C. (2016). Mobile learning as boundary crossing: An alternative route to technology-enhanced learning? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(5), 979–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1128211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011). Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies, & new literacies. Brock Education Journal, 21(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v21i1.236
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Systemic functional linguistics. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 21–34). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. H. (2015). A funds of knowledge approach to the appropriation of new media in a high school writing classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1064448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the sructure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
   Google Scholar
• Shafirova, L., Cassany, D., & Bach, C. (2020). From “newbie” to professional: Identity building and literacies in an online affinity space. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, L. E. (2013). Composing “kid-friendly” multimodal text: When conversations, instruction, and signs come together. Written Communication, 30(2), 194–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313480328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., Williams, K., Pruitt, A. A., & Schallert, D. (2017). Students as pinners: A multimodal analysis of a course activity involving curation on a social networking site. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. C., & Seah, L. H. (2011). Exploring relationship between students’ questioning behaviors and inquiry tasks in an online forum through analysis of ideational function of questions. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1675–1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Guo, W., Le, H., & Qiao, B. (2020). Reply to which post? An analysis of peer reviews in a high school SPOC. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., Hu, Y., Ruis, A. R., & Wang, M. (2019). Analysing computational thinking in collaborative programming: A quantitative ethnography approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar